25.07.2013 Views

Community planning services in Glenelg Shire Council : 1998-2005 ...

Community planning services in Glenelg Shire Council : 1998-2005 ...

Community planning services in Glenelg Shire Council : 1998-2005 ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Did the council effectively manage its outsourced <strong>plann<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>services</strong>? 107<br />

As Figure 5A shows, the roles and responsibilities of the <strong>plann<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />

contractor were clearly specified. As we noted <strong>in</strong> part 4.5 of this report, the<br />

contractual roles and responsibilities were supported by council<br />

delegations 49 issued to the <strong>plann<strong>in</strong>g</strong> contractor. Under these delegations,<br />

the <strong>plann<strong>in</strong>g</strong> contractor, <strong>in</strong> his role as a council employee, effectively was<br />

assigned the role of council.<br />

5.2.3 Contractual arrangements<br />

In an effectively managed outsourced <strong>plann<strong>in</strong>g</strong> function, we would expect<br />

to see performance-based contractual arrangements. These should clearly<br />

outl<strong>in</strong>e the <strong>services</strong> to be delivered and the rights and responsibilities of<br />

both parties.<br />

There should also be:<br />

a performance management system to monitor and assess the<br />

contractor’s performance<br />

appropriate dispute resolution provisions built <strong>in</strong>to the agreement.<br />

The contract between the council and the <strong>plann<strong>in</strong>g</strong> contractor was a<br />

standard commercial document, similar to that used by other local councils<br />

for their outsourc<strong>in</strong>g arrangements.<br />

The contract adequately outl<strong>in</strong>ed the <strong>services</strong> to be delivered, def<strong>in</strong>ed the<br />

commercial relationship between the council and the contractor, and<br />

addressed key contractual risks such as the contractor not meet<strong>in</strong>g<br />

required performance standards, term<strong>in</strong>ation of agreements and conflict of<br />

<strong>in</strong>terest.<br />

As the <strong>services</strong> contracted to external providers <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> size and<br />

complexity, councils are <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly us<strong>in</strong>g performance-based contracts.<br />

These contracts l<strong>in</strong>k part of the provider’s fee to the achievement of key<br />

performance targets <strong>in</strong> order to encourage enhanced performance.<br />

The <strong>plann<strong>in</strong>g</strong> contractor’s contract was performance-based. The annual<br />

amount paid by the council to the contractor for <strong>plann<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>services</strong> was<br />

based on the contractor achiev<strong>in</strong>g specified output targets. There was also<br />

a “variation to workload” agreement. This allowed the contractor’s<br />

monthly payments to be adjusted where the workload varied by more or<br />

less than 10 per cent. Additional amounts were rout<strong>in</strong>ely claimed by the<br />

<strong>plann<strong>in</strong>g</strong> contractor for the process<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>plann<strong>in</strong>g</strong> assessments over and<br />

above the contracted levels.<br />

49 Instrument of Delegation by council to members of council staff, January 2004.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!