Community planning services in Glenelg Shire Council : 1998-2005 ...
Community planning services in Glenelg Shire Council : 1998-2005 ...
Community planning services in Glenelg Shire Council : 1998-2005 ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Did the council effectively manage its outsourced <strong>plann<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>services</strong>? 107<br />
As Figure 5A shows, the roles and responsibilities of the <strong>plann<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />
contractor were clearly specified. As we noted <strong>in</strong> part 4.5 of this report, the<br />
contractual roles and responsibilities were supported by council<br />
delegations 49 issued to the <strong>plann<strong>in</strong>g</strong> contractor. Under these delegations,<br />
the <strong>plann<strong>in</strong>g</strong> contractor, <strong>in</strong> his role as a council employee, effectively was<br />
assigned the role of council.<br />
5.2.3 Contractual arrangements<br />
In an effectively managed outsourced <strong>plann<strong>in</strong>g</strong> function, we would expect<br />
to see performance-based contractual arrangements. These should clearly<br />
outl<strong>in</strong>e the <strong>services</strong> to be delivered and the rights and responsibilities of<br />
both parties.<br />
There should also be:<br />
a performance management system to monitor and assess the<br />
contractor’s performance<br />
appropriate dispute resolution provisions built <strong>in</strong>to the agreement.<br />
The contract between the council and the <strong>plann<strong>in</strong>g</strong> contractor was a<br />
standard commercial document, similar to that used by other local councils<br />
for their outsourc<strong>in</strong>g arrangements.<br />
The contract adequately outl<strong>in</strong>ed the <strong>services</strong> to be delivered, def<strong>in</strong>ed the<br />
commercial relationship between the council and the contractor, and<br />
addressed key contractual risks such as the contractor not meet<strong>in</strong>g<br />
required performance standards, term<strong>in</strong>ation of agreements and conflict of<br />
<strong>in</strong>terest.<br />
As the <strong>services</strong> contracted to external providers <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> size and<br />
complexity, councils are <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly us<strong>in</strong>g performance-based contracts.<br />
These contracts l<strong>in</strong>k part of the provider’s fee to the achievement of key<br />
performance targets <strong>in</strong> order to encourage enhanced performance.<br />
The <strong>plann<strong>in</strong>g</strong> contractor’s contract was performance-based. The annual<br />
amount paid by the council to the contractor for <strong>plann<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>services</strong> was<br />
based on the contractor achiev<strong>in</strong>g specified output targets. There was also<br />
a “variation to workload” agreement. This allowed the contractor’s<br />
monthly payments to be adjusted where the workload varied by more or<br />
less than 10 per cent. Additional amounts were rout<strong>in</strong>ely claimed by the<br />
<strong>plann<strong>in</strong>g</strong> contractor for the process<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>plann<strong>in</strong>g</strong> assessments over and<br />
above the contracted levels.<br />
49 Instrument of Delegation by council to members of council staff, January 2004.