25.07.2013 Views

Community planning services in Glenelg Shire Council : 1998-2005 ...

Community planning services in Glenelg Shire Council : 1998-2005 ...

Community planning services in Glenelg Shire Council : 1998-2005 ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Did the council effectively manage its outsourced <strong>plann<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>services</strong>? 115<br />

5.4 Evaluation and succession <strong>plann<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />

This third phase of the contract management lifecycle is about transition.<br />

Processes are needed to ensure a smooth transition from the exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />

contract to a new contract – whether it is with the same service provider, a<br />

new service provider or is provided <strong>in</strong>-house. This ensures m<strong>in</strong>imal<br />

disruption to the council’s operations.<br />

The contract succession phase (which may commence before the contract is<br />

completed), also <strong>in</strong>volves a review of the successes and failures that<br />

occurred over time <strong>in</strong> the contract arrangements.<br />

This process <strong>in</strong>volves:<br />

evaluat<strong>in</strong>g the outputs and outcomes of the contracted activity aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />

tender requirements<br />

assess<strong>in</strong>g the effectiveness of the contract <strong>in</strong> achiev<strong>in</strong>g government<br />

objectives for the activity<br />

assess<strong>in</strong>g effectiveness through feedback from clients and other<br />

stakeholders<br />

consider<strong>in</strong>g how to manage the possible transition to another provider<br />

consider<strong>in</strong>g new approaches at the completion of the current<br />

implementation period of the contract.<br />

The contract with the council provided for the <strong>plann<strong>in</strong>g</strong> contractor to assist<br />

with the transfer of the delivery of council <strong>plann<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>services</strong> to his<br />

successor, should the need arise.<br />

As <strong>in</strong>dicated previously, the <strong>plann<strong>in</strong>g</strong> contractor’s contractual performance<br />

and effectiveness <strong>in</strong> achiev<strong>in</strong>g <strong>plann<strong>in</strong>g</strong> outcomes was not monitored by<br />

the council. The council entered <strong>in</strong>to a second contract with the <strong>plann<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />

contractor <strong>in</strong> 2003 without any real evaluation of the contractor’s<br />

performance or re-assessment of the way <strong>in</strong> which council <strong>plann<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />

<strong>services</strong> could be delivered.<br />

5.4.1 Conclusion<br />

At the end of the <strong>plann<strong>in</strong>g</strong> contractor’s contract, a re-assessment of council<br />

<strong>plann<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>services</strong> was not undertaken to determ<strong>in</strong>e the most appropriate<br />

arrangements for the delivery of future <strong>plann<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>services</strong>.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!