25.07.2013 Views

Community planning services in Glenelg Shire Council : 1998-2005 ...

Community planning services in Glenelg Shire Council : 1998-2005 ...

Community planning services in Glenelg Shire Council : 1998-2005 ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Did the council comply with key legislative, <strong>plann<strong>in</strong>g</strong> scheme and other requirements? 57<br />

Challenges <strong>in</strong> assess<strong>in</strong>g applications for subdivisions<br />

Proposals to subdivide rural land, particularly where the subdivisions<br />

create properties for residential use, represent the most contentious<br />

<strong>plann<strong>in</strong>g</strong> issue to confront rural and regional Victoria.<br />

In rural zones, subdivisions designed to create properties for residential<br />

use can:<br />

create conflicts between farmers and residential landowners <strong>in</strong> relation<br />

to the impact farm<strong>in</strong>g activities have on residential users<br />

constra<strong>in</strong> new, expand<strong>in</strong>g or chang<strong>in</strong>g rural enterprises – particularly<br />

where there is potential smell, noise, dust, and crop spray<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

These subdivisions also impact on the “per hectare” value of the<br />

surround<strong>in</strong>g rural land. In rural localities perceived to have a good lifestyle<br />

amenity (or convenient access to an urban area), the existence of residential<br />

landholders may cause the value of the surround<strong>in</strong>g rural land to exceed<br />

the value from which an economic return could be achieved from farm<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs of our review<br />

Our review <strong>in</strong>dicated that <strong>in</strong> assess<strong>in</strong>g <strong>plann<strong>in</strong>g</strong> permit applications for<br />

subdivisions, the council narrowly considered each proposal’s technical<br />

compliance with the scheme. There is little evidence to suggest that the<br />

council considered whether the likely outcomes were consistent with the<br />

<strong>plann<strong>in</strong>g</strong> scheme objectives.<br />

Our file review highlighted 22 <strong>in</strong>stances where <strong>plann<strong>in</strong>g</strong> permits for the<br />

subdivision of land had been issued that were <strong>in</strong>consistent with the<br />

purpose of the zone, contrary to the requirements of the zone or<br />

<strong>in</strong>consistent with the council’s <strong>plann<strong>in</strong>g</strong> scheme. For example, <strong>plann<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />

permits for the subdivision of land <strong>in</strong> rural areas have been issued with<br />

result<strong>in</strong>g lot sizes smaller than the 40 hectares permitted under the<br />

<strong>plann<strong>in</strong>g</strong> scheme.<br />

The follow<strong>in</strong>g sections discuss how the subdivisions <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g averag<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

excisions to create residential blocks and transferable property rights were<br />

applied <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Glenelg</strong> <strong>Shire</strong>.<br />

Averag<strong>in</strong>g<br />

This provision enables a permit to be granted to create smaller lots<br />

provided that the total number of lots is no more than the number the land<br />

could be subdivided <strong>in</strong>to <strong>in</strong> accordance with the schedule to the zone and a<br />

legal agreement is entered <strong>in</strong>to which prohibits further subdivision.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!