08.08.2013 Views

History of Middlesex County, Massachusetts - citizen hylbom blog

History of Middlesex County, Massachusetts - citizen hylbom blog

History of Middlesex County, Massachusetts - citizen hylbom blog

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

214<br />

meeting-house, except two or tliree farms that lie<br />

above the Falls on Cliarles Eiver, near Dedham, and<br />

hardly ever go to meeting, and some <strong>of</strong> them are<br />

not much above two miles <strong>of</strong>f. If they attain their<br />

desire and set their meeting-house at their pleasure,<br />

sundry <strong>of</strong> them will be farther from it than many<br />

<strong>of</strong> them now are from Cambridge church. And<br />

upon the same ground when they plead for a divis-<br />

ion, we have need to have at least four meeting-<br />

houses in our town, which now find it difficult to<br />

maintain one, as it should."<br />

The committee <strong>of</strong> the court — Eichard Russell<br />

<strong>of</strong> Charlestown, Eleazur Lusher <strong>of</strong> Dedham, and<br />

Ephraim Child <strong>of</strong> Watertown — reported against<br />

this petition. Tlie principal reason assigned in<br />

their report was that "if the petitioners should<br />

withdraw their help from Cambridge church and<br />

ministry, it would be over-burdensome to Cam-<br />

bridge to provide for the support <strong>of</strong> their mhiister."<br />

And so the petitioners had leave to witlidraw.<br />

In 1661 the inhabitants again petitioned the<br />

General Court to be released from paying church<br />

rates to Cambridge. The erection <strong>of</strong> a new meet-<br />

ing-house had greatly strengthened their petition,<br />

and the court accordingly granted them " freedom<br />

from all church-rates for the support <strong>of</strong> the minis-<br />

try in Cambridge, and for all lands and estates<br />

whicli were more than four miles from Cambridge<br />

meeting-house, the measure to be in the usual<br />

paths that may be ordinarily passed."<br />

The petitioners were not satisfied mth the divid-<br />

ing line, and in 1662 they petitioned the court for<br />

HISTORY OF MIDDLESEX COUNTY.<br />

a new line. The action <strong>of</strong> the court upon this petition<br />

was as follows " : October, 1662. In answer<br />

to the petition <strong>of</strong> John Jackson and Tiiomas Wiswall,<br />

in behalf <strong>of</strong> the inhabitants <strong>of</strong> Cambridge<br />

Village, as a full and final issue <strong>of</strong> all things in<br />

controversy between the town <strong>of</strong> Cambridge and<br />

the petitioners, the Court judge it meet to order<br />

and appoint, and fully empower, Major William<br />

Ilawtliorne <strong>of</strong> Salem, Capt. Francis Norton <strong>of</strong><br />

Charlestown, and Capt. Hugh Mason <strong>of</strong> Water-<br />

town, as a Committee to give the petitioners, or<br />

some in their behalf, with some invited in belialf<br />

<strong>of</strong> the town <strong>of</strong> Cambridge, op|Mutunily to make<br />

their desires known, and Major ilnwllKinu' to appoint<br />

the time and place for the liearing <strong>of</strong> what<br />

all parties can say, so it be sometime before the<br />

next Court <strong>of</strong> elections ; and on tlie hearing tliere<strong>of</strong><br />

bounds, that so this Court may no more be troubled<br />

thereabouts."<br />

This committee ran the line and settled the<br />

bounds between the Village and Cambridge in<br />

1662, so far as ministerial taxes were concerned.<br />

This, no doubt, is substantially the same line that<br />

now divides Newton from Brighton.<br />

Again in 1672 Edward Jackson and John Jack-<br />

son, in behalf <strong>of</strong> the inhabitants <strong>of</strong> Cambridge Vil-<br />

lage, petitioned the General Court to be set <strong>of</strong>f from<br />

Cambridge and made an independent town. In<br />

answer to this petition, "the court in 1673 doth,<br />

judge meet to grant to tlie inhabitants <strong>of</strong> said Vil-<br />

lage annually to elect one constable and three<br />

selectmen dwelling among themselves, to order the<br />

prudential affairs <strong>of</strong> the inhabitants there accord-<br />

ing to law, only continuing a part <strong>of</strong> Cambridge in<br />

paying <strong>County</strong> and Country rates, as also Town<br />

rates so far as refers to the grammar school and<br />

bridge over Charles River, and also their propor-<br />

tion <strong>of</strong> the charges <strong>of</strong> the deputies."<br />

This act <strong>of</strong> the court was not satisfactory to the<br />

Village, and they did not accept it nor act under it.<br />

In 1677 further action was had relative to tlie<br />

dividhig line between Cambridge and the Village.<br />

The Village chose C'aptain Thomas Prentice, James<br />

Trowbridge, Noah Wiswall, and Jonathan Hyde,<br />

a committee to settle the line by reference, — two<br />

referees to be chosen by the Village and two from<br />

Cambridge, and they four to choose the fifth. The<br />

referees thus chosen were Richard Calicott, Wil-<br />

liam Symes, William Johnson, William Bond, and<br />

Richard Louden. The result <strong>of</strong> this reference was<br />

a line described as follows :<br />

to issue fully and absolutely conclude and deter- Sr., Richard Park, Sr., Thomas Hnnnnond, Sr.,<br />

mine, what they shall judge necessary and just to Rev. Jolm Eliot, John Jackson, Jr., and Vincent<br />

be done, as to the deteniiiniiig the four mile Druee, Sr.<br />

—<br />

" Corner near the widow John Jackson's orchard<br />

and a chestnut-tree in Mr. Edward Jackson's pas-<br />

ture, and to continue until it comes to the River<br />

then southerly by a heap <strong>of</strong> stones, four miles from<br />

Cambridge meeting-house; thence to continue until<br />

it comes to Boston (now Brookline) bounds.<br />

"Dated July 27, 1677."<br />

This is probably the line wliich now divides<br />

Newton from Brighton.<br />

In 1678 most <strong>of</strong> the freemen <strong>of</strong> the Village signed<br />

a petition to the General Court, praying to be set<br />

<strong>of</strong>f' from Cambridge and to be made a town by itself.<br />

Fifty-two names were appended to tliis petition;<br />

tliirteen <strong>of</strong> the inhabitants did not sign it. Six <strong>of</strong><br />

the first settlers had deceased, viz. .lohn Jackson,<br />

;

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!