08.08.2013 Views

History of Middlesex County, Massachusetts - citizen hylbom blog

History of Middlesex County, Massachusetts - citizen hylbom blog

History of Middlesex County, Massachusetts - citizen hylbom blog

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ehind a log, and not caring to unnecessarily expose<br />

his person, he kept iiiniself under cover, and<br />

extended his hat in sucli a manner as to draw the<br />

fire <strong>of</strong> the unwary savage, and the next instant the<br />

ball had whizzed from his unerring musket with<br />

fatal effect. Fearing the vengeance <strong>of</strong> the tribe<br />

should they discover the dead body, he buried it in<br />

his own cellar. By family tradition it iias been<br />

handed down that this man died as a soldier in<br />

1690, when returning home from the expedition <strong>of</strong><br />

Sir William Phi])s to Canada. From then till<br />

now his name has been borne by numerous de-<br />

scendants who have always been among the chief<br />

men <strong>of</strong> the town <strong>of</strong> wiiicii he was one <strong>of</strong> the first<br />

settlers. I refer to Thom'as Gerry."<br />

Tlie tradition connected with the settlement <strong>of</strong><br />

the first person by the name <strong>of</strong> Hadley is as fol-<br />

lows : One morning, during the early settlement<br />

<strong>of</strong> the town, a man named Gould, living near the<br />

residence <strong>of</strong> Pliilander Ames, formerly that <strong>of</strong><br />

Thomas Gould, being at his barn at a very early,<br />

hour, saw a man destitute <strong>of</strong> clothing approach-<br />

ing him, who said that lie had deserted from a<br />

vessel tlie previous night, and being fearful that<br />

his clothes miglit retard his escape, had divested<br />

liimself <strong>of</strong> them. He also stated that if Gould<br />

would provide him with clothing, and keep him<br />

secreted until after the vessel had left Boston, he<br />

would work a sufficient length <strong>of</strong> time to compen-<br />

sate Gould for all the trouble and expense incurred.<br />

Hadley's Christian name is supposed to have<br />

been Anthony ; the records, however, do not con-<br />

firm this. But as he is said to have married a<br />

daughter <strong>of</strong> Richard Holden, and the marriage <strong>of</strong><br />

Anthony Hadley to Abigail Green, November 15,<br />

17-i4, is registered, and the birth <strong>of</strong> Abigail Had-<br />

ley, a daughter <strong>of</strong> Anthony Hadley, Jr., and Abi-<br />

gail, recorded July 5, 11 -il, there can be little<br />

doubt as to his Christian name.<br />

In a few years after Richard Holden's purchase<br />

he disposed <strong>of</strong> a considerable portion <strong>of</strong> his land<br />

to Ebenezer Parker, Jacob How, Spring, and<br />

Anthony Hadley ; a piece <strong>of</strong> it still retains the<br />

name <strong>of</strong> Spring Pasture. Among tlie first settlers<br />

were John Vinton and Jonathan Green, at the<br />

southeasterly part <strong>of</strong> tiie town ; the lands then belonging<br />

to John "Vinton, and in later years owned<br />

by several <strong>of</strong> the same name, as well as lands<br />

owned by persons by the name <strong>of</strong> Green, being<br />

STOXEHAM.<br />

I Stoneham<br />

at the present time included within the limits <strong>of</strong> the the place <strong>of</strong> Public Worship, &c. And have there-<br />

town <strong>of</strong> Melrose. The house <strong>of</strong> Jonatliau Green upon made their application to the said Town <strong>of</strong><br />

was built about the year 1700, and is still standing Charlestown, and have likewise addressed this Court<br />

341<br />

on the westerly side <strong>of</strong> Green Lane. When first<br />

occupied, the east part <strong>of</strong> the house was used for<br />

a stable, thereby exhibiting the kindness <strong>of</strong> the<br />

occupant for his horse as well as for the members<br />

<strong>of</strong> his family. Green was a member <strong>of</strong> the Troop<br />

Company, and <strong>of</strong>ten went to Groton and vicinity,<br />

as that appears to have been a noted place <strong>of</strong> resort<br />

for the destruction <strong>of</strong> the Indians. Jonathan<br />

Green, a descendant in the fifth generation, is still<br />

an owner and occupant <strong>of</strong> the premises. John<br />

Gould, Thomas Cutler, and William Rogers are<br />

said to have been numbered with the first settlers<br />

at the northeasterly part <strong>of</strong> the town, and although<br />

the names <strong>of</strong> John Gould and William Rogers do<br />

not appear in the records <strong>of</strong> births, marriages, or<br />

deaths, the births <strong>of</strong> Sarah Gould, born August 29,<br />

1706, and Daniel Gould, born June 10, 1709, son<br />

and daughter <strong>of</strong> Daniel and Sarah, are found the<br />

first births occurring in Stoneham that are entered<br />

upon the records.<br />

Of those early days Mr. W. B. Stevens says<br />

in his oration: "Prior to 16S5, when two <strong>of</strong> the<br />

first highways were built, — one from that part<br />

<strong>of</strong> Reading which now constitutes Wakefield, to<br />

Woburn, and the other to Charlestown, — and the<br />

communication had been by means <strong>of</strong> bridle-ways<br />

and circuitous cart-paths cut through the wilder-<br />

ness, you will be able to form an idea <strong>of</strong> the rude<br />

life wJiich must have been led by our early ances-<br />

tors. During these years our pious forefathers,<br />

not numerous enougli to support a minister them-<br />

selves, with the musket in one hand and the Bible<br />

in the other, travelled on Sunday to the meeting-<br />

house in Reading, and there mingled their prayers<br />

with the people <strong>of</strong> a neighboring town."<br />

Stoneham remained for a long period a part <strong>of</strong><br />

Charlestown, notwithstanding the early dates <strong>of</strong> the<br />

incorporation <strong>of</strong> the town <strong>of</strong> Medford, Septem-<br />

ber 2S, 16:30 ; Woburn, May 18, 1643 ; Reading,<br />

May 29, 104-4, and Maiden, May 2, 1649. Stoneham<br />

was made a town December 17, 172.5. The<br />

following is a part <strong>of</strong> the act <strong>of</strong> incorporation : —<br />

" An act for dividing the Town <strong>of</strong> Charlestown<br />

and enacting a new Town there by the name <strong>of</strong><br />

—<br />

:<br />

" Whereas the Northerly part <strong>of</strong> the Town <strong>of</strong><br />

Charlestown, within the <strong>County</strong> <strong>of</strong> IMiildlesex, is<br />

competently filled with Inhabitants who labor<br />

under great difficulties by their remoteness from

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!