08.08.2013 Views

History of Middlesex County, Massachusetts - citizen hylbom blog

History of Middlesex County, Massachusetts - citizen hylbom blog

History of Middlesex County, Massachusetts - citizen hylbom blog

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

others, inhabitants <strong>of</strong> the easterly part <strong>of</strong> Concord,<br />

the northerly part <strong>of</strong> Weston, and westerly part <strong>of</strong><br />

Lexington, presented a petition to the General<br />

Court, setting forth their difficulties and inconven-<br />

iences by reason <strong>of</strong> their distances from their usual<br />

places <strong>of</strong> public worship in their respective towns,<br />

and praying to be erected into a separate township.<br />

This petition was summarily dismissed ;<br />

LINCOLN. 35<br />

but, noth-<br />

ing daunted by their failure, the next year, July 2,<br />

1735, John Flint, Simon Dakin, Josiah Parks, and<br />

other inhabitants <strong>of</strong> the easterly part <strong>of</strong> Concord,<br />

northerly part <strong>of</strong> Weston, and westerly part <strong>of</strong><br />

Lexington, petitioned to be made a separate town-<br />

ship. On this petition the General Court issued<br />

the usual orders <strong>of</strong> notice to the towns <strong>of</strong> Concord,<br />

Weston, and Lexington, to appear on the second<br />

Wednesday <strong>of</strong> the next sitting <strong>of</strong> the court, and<br />

show cause why the prayer <strong>of</strong> the petition should<br />

not be granted. In October the petition was<br />

taken up and read again, with the answers <strong>of</strong> the<br />

towns <strong>of</strong> Concord, Weston, and Lexington ; and<br />

the council voted that the prayer <strong>of</strong> the petition<br />

"be so far granted that Francis Foxcr<strong>of</strong>t and<br />

Josiah Willard Esqrs., with such as the Hon.<br />

House may join, be a committee to repair to the<br />

place proposed to be made into a township, and<br />

carefully view and consider the situation there<strong>of</strong><br />

and the circumstances <strong>of</strong> the petitioners, and the<br />

towns named in the petition, giving seasonable notice<br />

to all parties <strong>of</strong> their coming ; and make report<br />

to this Court what they judge proper to be done<br />

on this petition, the charge <strong>of</strong> the Committee to be<br />

borne as the court shall order."<br />

To this vote <strong>of</strong> the council the house <strong>of</strong> repre-<br />

sentatives voted a non-concurrence; upon which,<br />

the council voted to adhere to their own vote.<br />

The subject was taken up again on the 26th <strong>of</strong><br />

November and 2d <strong>of</strong> December, 1735, with like<br />

results; each branch voting a non-concurrence<br />

with the other. January 2, 1735-36, after a<br />

long debate, the house voted a reconsideration <strong>of</strong><br />

their votes <strong>of</strong> non-concurrence, and on the 7th<br />

voted a concurrence in the vote <strong>of</strong> the council,<br />

and Captain Jeremiah Stevens, Captain Adam<br />

Gushing, and Ephraim Leonard, Esq. were joined<br />

to the committee <strong>of</strong> the council. On the 18th <strong>of</strong><br />

March the committee were directed to report to<br />

the next May session. June 2, 1736, the committee<br />

submitted the following report —<br />

:<br />

" Pursuant to an order <strong>of</strong> the Great and Gen-<br />

eral Court, on the petition hereunto annexed, the<br />

Committee appointed to repair to the place men-<br />

tioned in said petition, prayed to be a township, to<br />

view and consider the situation there<strong>of</strong>, and the<br />

circumstances <strong>of</strong> the petitioners, and also <strong>of</strong> the<br />

towns mentioned in the petition, and hear all par-<br />

ties concerned, have carefully performed that ser-<br />

vice, and are <strong>of</strong> the opinion that the prayer <strong>of</strong> the<br />

petition be not granted, which is humbly sub-<br />

mitted by, Fra' Foxcr<strong>of</strong>t, pr. order."<br />

The report was accepted in both branches, and<br />

the petition ordered to be dismissed, and it was<br />

further ordered that the' charge <strong>of</strong> the view,<br />

amounting to £54^ 16*. 2d., be paid as follows:<br />

£18 to the committee <strong>of</strong> this court for their<br />

attendance and travel by the petitioners, — £18<br />

8*. 4f/. by the town <strong>of</strong> Concord, and the remain-<br />

der by the towns <strong>of</strong> Weston and Lexington in equal<br />

proportions. TLj.ojLy<strong>of</strong>j)<br />

No further action looking to the incorporation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the town took place for several years. Au-<br />

gust 18, 1744, Joshua Brooks and forty-eight<br />

others, iidiabitants <strong>of</strong> the easterly part <strong>of</strong> Concord,<br />

northerly part <strong>of</strong> Weston, and westerly part <strong>of</strong><br />

Lexington, petitioned to be made a separate pre-<br />

cinct. On this petition the usual orders <strong>of</strong> notice<br />

were issued, and after various delays a viewing<br />

committee was appointed. On the 18th <strong>of</strong> April,<br />

1746, the committee reported that the prayer <strong>of</strong><br />

the petition ought to be granted, — which report<br />

was accepted, and it was ordered that " the peti-<br />

tioners, together with the persons living within the<br />

bounds mentioned in the petition (except such<br />

persons and estates as are excepted by the report),<br />

be and are hereby erected into a distinct and sepa-<br />

rate precinct, and vested with all such powers and<br />

privileges as other precincts within this province<br />

have, or by law ought to enjoy — and that such<br />

<strong>of</strong> the aforesaid exempted persons as shall within<br />

one year signify to the Secretary under their hands<br />

their willingness to join with the petitioners be to-<br />

gether mth their estates incorporated with them,<br />

to do and receive alike duty and privilege as the<br />

petitioners "<br />

No act <strong>of</strong> incorporation otlier than this order<br />

was passed, but it was voted "that Benjamin<br />

Brown one <strong>of</strong> the principal inhabitants <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Parish this day set <strong>of</strong>f from Concord, Lexington<br />

and Weston be and hereby is enabled to call the<br />

first precinct meeting in said parish to choose<br />

parish <strong>of</strong>ficers and to act and do all other things<br />

according to Law." This order or precept is still<br />

preserved by Deacon Brown's descendants. Under<br />

its authority the precinct met at the bouse <strong>of</strong> Mr.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!