24.09.2013 Views

2008 - Marketing Educators' Association

2008 - Marketing Educators' Association

2008 - Marketing Educators' Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

EXHIBIT 1<br />

Excerpted Portions of the Syllabus for<br />

<strong>Marketing</strong> Management<br />

Course Objectives<br />

Roll up your sleeves and see the results of your<br />

decision-making. This course is a hands-on analysis<br />

and actual decision-making journey in marketing<br />

strategy. Experience the power of strategy tools<br />

such as differentiation and positioning. We<br />

additionally study actual case histories and<br />

decisions made by real managers and executives –<br />

and see how they did. The conclusion of the course<br />

provides an opportunity to apply your knowledge of<br />

marketing strategy and marketing management via a<br />

computer simulation. Major marketing concepts,<br />

principles, and strategy are directly applied.<br />

Prerequisite: MKTG 3010.<br />

The course will focus on the following topics:<br />

(1) The role of marketing in an organization<br />

(2) The strategic principles of marketing<br />

(3) The relationship between product/market<br />

strategy and marketing mix decisions<br />

Pedagogy<br />

<strong>Marketing</strong> management is not a lecture class,<br />

although I will provide structure and give lectures.<br />

Three major teaching vehicles are employed: case<br />

discussion, readings, and simulation. <strong>Marketing</strong><br />

cases provide the opportunity to make marketing<br />

decisions in a wide variety of circumstances. We will<br />

work through the process of making decisions given<br />

limited data by involving colleagues and objectively<br />

evaluating ideas before reaching conclusions. This<br />

process requires your participation and thought.<br />

Often, a single right answer does not exist, but<br />

consistent strategies that have distinctive merits can<br />

be explored. Depth of analysis is more valuable than<br />

consensus on all issues.<br />

140<br />

EXHIBIT 2<br />

Components of Writing Evaluation Criteria<br />

(1) Argument: Writing a clear and consistent<br />

argument. Is your argument logical so that the<br />

reader follows your points easily?<br />

(2) Evidence: Using and explaining evidence.<br />

Have you used detailed evidence and have you<br />

explained your evidence so that the reader<br />

understands it as you intended?<br />

(3) Format: Organizing and formatting your report.<br />

Did you follow the format and organization style<br />

expected (including a clear introduction,<br />

analysis and recommendation)?<br />

(4) Writing rules: Following grammar punctuation<br />

and style rules. Have you followed writing rules<br />

consistently?<br />

(5) Appendices: Using and citing appendices<br />

correctly. Have you included appendices and<br />

properly used and noted them for the reader?<br />

Each of these components was rated on a 5-point<br />

scale of Poor, Below Average, Average, Above<br />

Average and Good.<br />

We converted these ratings to a GPA with Good<br />

translating to an A- or 3.7, Above Average to a B+<br />

(3.3), Average to a B (3.0), Below Average to a C+<br />

(2.3) and Poor to a C (2.0).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!