2008 - Marketing Educators' Association
2008 - Marketing Educators' Association
2008 - Marketing Educators' Association
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
TABLE 2<br />
Example Frequencies:<br />
“Russia is Least Like (Country B) Because …”<br />
Country<br />
Economic<br />
Political<br />
Cultural<br />
Technological<br />
Linguistic<br />
Historic<br />
Geographic<br />
USA 24 45 5 2 2 4 2<br />
Japan 3 2 1 3<br />
UK 3 6<br />
Australia 2 1 1<br />
individual dimensions. Similarity can be compared<br />
with the one’s own country or with other countries.<br />
To ease the analysis effort for the instructor, a limited<br />
set of countries can be presented for the students to<br />
rate. Experience indicates that 4 or 5 countries<br />
permits an adequate range for illustration and 10<br />
countries presents a challenge of too much data for<br />
the instructor to discuss in the classroom.<br />
Another option is to have the students rate the<br />
importance (perhaps on a 5-point scale) of each<br />
dimension when comparing country A with country B.<br />
It is interesting to observe that while students may<br />
feel that countries differ on some dimensions, they<br />
may rate those differences as low importance. A<br />
conversation about differences versus the importance<br />
of those differences can be a fascinating discussion.<br />
DISCUSSING MULTIDIMENSIONAL<br />
FOREIGNNESS<br />
The purpose of this exercise was to demonstrate the<br />
complexity of foreignness and why countries are<br />
different (Lundstrom, White, & Schuster, 1996). The<br />
dimensions indicate that foreignness is a more<br />
general and more complex concept than country-oforigin,<br />
ethnocentricity, and liability of foreignness.<br />
Points of differences may be found to be important<br />
depending on the reference country (cf., Netemeyer,<br />
Durvasula, & Lichtenstein, 1991). Thus the criteria of<br />
foreignness in each market must be considered<br />
separately when developing firm or product<br />
strategies. This exercise is a very accessible option<br />
(cf., Tyagi, 2001) in raising international awareness<br />
and broadening the students’ view of what it means<br />
to be foreign. Students can become more aware of<br />
their own perspectives and the potential attitudes<br />
held by others (cf., Lundstron, White, & Schuster,<br />
1996). Discussions can solidify concepts and<br />
improve the students’ understanding of international<br />
marketing decisions.<br />
37<br />
Using multiple dimensions of what it means to be<br />
foreign enables the instructor to capture a wide array<br />
of issues and provides the underlying rationale that<br />
ultimately affects managerial decisions. These<br />
dimensions may have direct effects such as<br />
consumers feeling that Italian designed clothing are<br />
better than other clothing. In this case, country-oforigin<br />
is affected without passing through<br />
intermediate attitudes such as ethnocentricity (cf.,<br />
Sharma, Shimp, & Shin, 1995). Underlying<br />
foreignness attitudes view people, counties,<br />
companies, and products as not-like-each-other in a<br />
wider, more cosmopolitan worldview. Conversely,<br />
ethnocentrism combines the underlying attitudes into<br />
a narrower construct of not-like-us. These narrower<br />
attitudes suggest natural or cultural protectionism that<br />
affects both country-of-origin and liability-offoreignness.<br />
These narrower attitudes may be more<br />
strongly held than underlying attitudes because they<br />
may be conceptually closer to the self. Ethnocentrism<br />
attitudes are directed without discretion at all<br />
counties perceived to be foreign (cf., Sharma, Shimp,<br />
& Shin, 1995). The intermediate attitudes combine<br />
some very strongly held underlying opinions into<br />
strongly held negative intent-to-purchase positions<br />
directed toward a country and create special liabilities<br />
that must be overcome (cf., Zaheer, 1995).<br />
STUDENT RESPONSE TO THE SAME /<br />
DIFFERENT EXERCISE<br />
Following the exercises, students were presented<br />
with an open-ended evaluation of their experience as<br />
well as Likert scales for statements on their beliefs<br />
about the same/different exercise. Ratings<br />
statements asked how useful the exercise was in<br />
raising awareness and understanding of the number<br />
of criteria used to evaluate whether a country is<br />
foreign (Table 3). Results indicated that students<br />
would use more evaluation criteria in foreignness<br />
judgments. The exercise helped them to improve<br />
their ability to judge and integrate issues. In addition,<br />
the exercise allowed them to predict responses from<br />
others beyond their original considerations. They felt<br />
more comfortable in their own judgments and relayed<br />
concern for making good judgments about<br />
foreignness.