24.09.2013 Views

2008 - Marketing Educators' Association

2008 - Marketing Educators' Association

2008 - Marketing Educators' Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

TABLE 2<br />

Example Frequencies:<br />

“Russia is Least Like (Country B) Because …”<br />

Country<br />

Economic<br />

Political<br />

Cultural<br />

Technological<br />

Linguistic<br />

Historic<br />

Geographic<br />

USA 24 45 5 2 2 4 2<br />

Japan 3 2 1 3<br />

UK 3 6<br />

Australia 2 1 1<br />

individual dimensions. Similarity can be compared<br />

with the one’s own country or with other countries.<br />

To ease the analysis effort for the instructor, a limited<br />

set of countries can be presented for the students to<br />

rate. Experience indicates that 4 or 5 countries<br />

permits an adequate range for illustration and 10<br />

countries presents a challenge of too much data for<br />

the instructor to discuss in the classroom.<br />

Another option is to have the students rate the<br />

importance (perhaps on a 5-point scale) of each<br />

dimension when comparing country A with country B.<br />

It is interesting to observe that while students may<br />

feel that countries differ on some dimensions, they<br />

may rate those differences as low importance. A<br />

conversation about differences versus the importance<br />

of those differences can be a fascinating discussion.<br />

DISCUSSING MULTIDIMENSIONAL<br />

FOREIGNNESS<br />

The purpose of this exercise was to demonstrate the<br />

complexity of foreignness and why countries are<br />

different (Lundstrom, White, & Schuster, 1996). The<br />

dimensions indicate that foreignness is a more<br />

general and more complex concept than country-oforigin,<br />

ethnocentricity, and liability of foreignness.<br />

Points of differences may be found to be important<br />

depending on the reference country (cf., Netemeyer,<br />

Durvasula, & Lichtenstein, 1991). Thus the criteria of<br />

foreignness in each market must be considered<br />

separately when developing firm or product<br />

strategies. This exercise is a very accessible option<br />

(cf., Tyagi, 2001) in raising international awareness<br />

and broadening the students’ view of what it means<br />

to be foreign. Students can become more aware of<br />

their own perspectives and the potential attitudes<br />

held by others (cf., Lundstron, White, & Schuster,<br />

1996). Discussions can solidify concepts and<br />

improve the students’ understanding of international<br />

marketing decisions.<br />

37<br />

Using multiple dimensions of what it means to be<br />

foreign enables the instructor to capture a wide array<br />

of issues and provides the underlying rationale that<br />

ultimately affects managerial decisions. These<br />

dimensions may have direct effects such as<br />

consumers feeling that Italian designed clothing are<br />

better than other clothing. In this case, country-oforigin<br />

is affected without passing through<br />

intermediate attitudes such as ethnocentricity (cf.,<br />

Sharma, Shimp, & Shin, 1995). Underlying<br />

foreignness attitudes view people, counties,<br />

companies, and products as not-like-each-other in a<br />

wider, more cosmopolitan worldview. Conversely,<br />

ethnocentrism combines the underlying attitudes into<br />

a narrower construct of not-like-us. These narrower<br />

attitudes suggest natural or cultural protectionism that<br />

affects both country-of-origin and liability-offoreignness.<br />

These narrower attitudes may be more<br />

strongly held than underlying attitudes because they<br />

may be conceptually closer to the self. Ethnocentrism<br />

attitudes are directed without discretion at all<br />

counties perceived to be foreign (cf., Sharma, Shimp,<br />

& Shin, 1995). The intermediate attitudes combine<br />

some very strongly held underlying opinions into<br />

strongly held negative intent-to-purchase positions<br />

directed toward a country and create special liabilities<br />

that must be overcome (cf., Zaheer, 1995).<br />

STUDENT RESPONSE TO THE SAME /<br />

DIFFERENT EXERCISE<br />

Following the exercises, students were presented<br />

with an open-ended evaluation of their experience as<br />

well as Likert scales for statements on their beliefs<br />

about the same/different exercise. Ratings<br />

statements asked how useful the exercise was in<br />

raising awareness and understanding of the number<br />

of criteria used to evaluate whether a country is<br />

foreign (Table 3). Results indicated that students<br />

would use more evaluation criteria in foreignness<br />

judgments. The exercise helped them to improve<br />

their ability to judge and integrate issues. In addition,<br />

the exercise allowed them to predict responses from<br />

others beyond their original considerations. They felt<br />

more comfortable in their own judgments and relayed<br />

concern for making good judgments about<br />

foreignness.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!