24.09.2013 Views

2008 - Marketing Educators' Association

2008 - Marketing Educators' Association

2008 - Marketing Educators' Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

WHEN STUDENTS BUST YOUR MELLOW: GETTING THE CLASS BACK IN THE GROOVE, DUDE<br />

D. Joel Whalen and Stephen K. Koernig, DePaul University,<br />

Department of <strong>Marketing</strong>, 1 East Jackson Blvd., Chicago, IL 60604;<br />

jwhalen@condor.depaul.edu, skoernig@depaul.edu<br />

The majority of students have no trouble behaving<br />

within class norms. However, most professors have<br />

occasionally encountered a small subset of students<br />

who engage in occasional behavior that is outside<br />

the norm, and disturbs the learning environment.<br />

Common examples include walking in after class<br />

has begun, leaving class early, sleeping in class,<br />

text messaging in class, taking or making calls on<br />

cell phones, talking to classmates during lecture,<br />

submitting assignments late, etc. Educators must<br />

have strategies and skills for effectively dealing with<br />

norm violation because this may inhibit or even stop<br />

a student’s learning.<br />

Many of the studies investigating the attributes of<br />

“master teachers” have suggested that a flexible,<br />

friendly classroom environment will enhance<br />

teaching effectiveness (Faranda & Clarke, 2004;<br />

Kelley, Conant, & Smart, 1991). Students also prefer<br />

an open, level environment where they are equals<br />

with their professors (Faranda & Clarke, 2004).<br />

However, professors can bring an open, egalitarian<br />

atmosphere to their classrooms only when a<br />

learning harmony is established and maintained. To<br />

promote a harmonic stasis, university education<br />

takes place in a well-codified environment of<br />

traditional roles and classroom norms wherein both<br />

student and teacher know their expected roles,<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

14<br />

contributions, and normative behavior (Amanda &<br />

Smith, 1994). For example, master teachers use<br />

their syllabi and assignments to set boundaries for<br />

their students; deadlines and rules are structured to<br />

enhance the student’s learning experience (Conant,<br />

Smart, & Kelley, 1988; Kelley, Conant, & Smart,<br />

1991). In addition, many schools proscribe clear<br />

codes of conduct for the university, college and<br />

departments. The purpose of codifying these norms<br />

is to provide a structure of respectful human<br />

interaction that produces freedom of thought,<br />

expression and inquiry within a harmonious learning<br />

atmosphere.<br />

A critical issue is how to respond to the student after<br />

he or she violates classroom norms. This paper<br />

identifies strategies to help maintain classroom<br />

decorum and to prevent violation of the classroom<br />

norms in the first place. A model is also presented<br />

that describes a process to resolve problems<br />

involving the violation of classroom norms when they<br />

do occur. These strategies help the professor deal<br />

with the violation of norms in a way that is mutually<br />

beneficial to both the professor and the student.<br />

References Available on Request.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!