24.09.2013 Views

2008 - Marketing Educators' Association

2008 - Marketing Educators' Association

2008 - Marketing Educators' Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chew and Mclnnis-Bowers (2004) explained<br />

education to create the ability to connect liberal<br />

education to business education as blending<br />

education. Blending education can develop students’<br />

basic managerial skills such as observation,<br />

assessment, flexible adaptation, learning, leadership,<br />

and communications. This is also supported by<br />

premier commissions such as the Carnegie<br />

Foundation and the Ford Foundation.<br />

These institutions clearly state that business<br />

managers need to learn more basic education in the<br />

various fields rather than highly technical marketing<br />

skills (Chew & Mclnnis-Bowers, 2004).<br />

Some colleges have already tried blending<br />

education in introductory marketing or business<br />

courses. For example, Birmingham-Southern<br />

College created an introductory business course<br />

named, “Foundation of Business Thought.” This is<br />

taught by an interdisciplinary faculty team whose<br />

members come from the humanities, the sciences,<br />

and business. The team teaches business from<br />

various perspectives so that students can effectively<br />

develop various basic managerial skills such as (1)<br />

oral and written communication skills, (2) critical<br />

thinking and assessment, (3) a wider scope of<br />

business perspectives, (4) a sense of business<br />

ethics, (5) global business perspectives, and (6) selfassessment<br />

(Chew & Mclnnis-Bowers, 2004).<br />

These learning outcomes are very similar to the key<br />

elements of the successful college education which<br />

were reported by Light (2004). Such key elements<br />

are (1) solid basic concepts, (2) controversy<br />

arguments, (3) group homework and group study,<br />

(4) group presentation, and (5) group projects.<br />

Light (2004) also mentioned that successful students<br />

tended to be self-motivated with strong basic<br />

knowledge, and learn material effectively through<br />

group activities which students with different<br />

backgrounds had to work together. As Light (2004)<br />

made the solid basic concepts the first of his key<br />

elements, we also think that learning basic concepts<br />

is the most critical thing, therefore, a starting point of<br />

the blended learning. Exams should be also<br />

effectively used to support such basic concept<br />

learning in introductory courses.<br />

Myers and Myers (2007) proposed frequent exams<br />

to make sure students learn basic concepts well.<br />

According to them, frequent exams are very effective<br />

since students can focus on narrower areas of study,<br />

receive prompt feedback about their basic<br />

knowledge, feel more confidence and competence in<br />

the subjects, and maintain learning motivation.<br />

51<br />

Edwards (2007) also reported one thing that makes<br />

exams effective. He found that self-graded exams<br />

allow students to notice their weakness and to<br />

maintain learning motivation in a less-stressful<br />

learning environments. Therefore, we think that<br />

frequent self-graded exams may be highly suitable<br />

for our situation.<br />

STUDENT MENTORING AT LIBERAL<br />

ARTS COLLEGES<br />

Effective mentoring is one of the most important<br />

components of college education. When mentoring<br />

exists, professors can directly support each student<br />

in his/her career and professional development.<br />

Such support also includes emotional and<br />

psychosocial assistance to the students (Cox &<br />

Orehovec, 2007). As a result, excellent mentoring<br />

can be called a humanization of interactions<br />

between faculty members and their students.<br />

Mentoring is the highest and fourth level of<br />

interaction between professors and their students.<br />

There are four different levels of interaction: noninteraction,<br />

functional interaction, personal<br />

interaction, and mentoring. In the functional<br />

interaction stage, students feel comfortable to ask<br />

questions to professors. If functional interaction<br />

becomes personal interaction, students tend to start<br />

talking about their personal issues and enjoy<br />

informal meetings and personal chatting with<br />

professors (Cox & Orehovec, 2007). We can see<br />

that personal interaction will be a precondition for<br />

effective mentoring. In other words, we think that<br />

lecturers need to have the ability to (1) start<br />

interaction with students at some point, and (2)<br />

satisfy the precondition quickly for the effective<br />

mentoring.<br />

While we discussed our responsibilities as mentors,<br />

successful mentoring relies not only on mentors but<br />

also on mentees. Light (2004) discussed six<br />

prerequisites that students must satisfy in order to<br />

be successful mentees. First, they should be certain<br />

about academic and personal meanings of learning.<br />

Second, they should know effective time<br />

management. In other words, students should be<br />

able to have sufficient time to work on their tasks<br />

through effective time allocation. Third, they should<br />

be able to see things from both short-term and longterm<br />

perspectives. Especially, they should be able to<br />

determine several short-term goals towards their<br />

long-term goals. This includes their ability to design<br />

and plan their long-term career development through<br />

short-term learning components. Fourth, they should<br />

be motivated and encouraged to apply learned<br />

knowledge to real situations. Sustainability of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!