READIT - 2009 - Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research
READIT - 2009 - Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research
READIT - 2009 - Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Proceedings of <strong>READIT</strong>-<strong>2009</strong>, Kalpakkam - 603 102, 29-30 Dec <strong>2009</strong><br />
Ranganathan’s Facet Analysis and the Semantic Web in the<br />
age of e-Science (Extended Abstracts)<br />
M.Ratnasamy<br />
Central Library, Indian Institute of Technology<br />
Kharagpur – 721 302, West Bengal<br />
WEB AND LIBRARY<br />
The development of Web and the proliferation of Web resources have taken place largely outside<br />
the sphere of Library and In<strong>for</strong>mation Science profession or practice. There is no comprehensive<br />
framework which guides the organization of the Web and there is lack of control over the<br />
creation of Web resources. The problems of indexing the Web resources <strong>for</strong> the unknown users<br />
have to make many assumptions as the core of indexing foundations. While Search Engines<br />
have used automatic word indexing, it may not fit well with the reality of In<strong>for</strong>mation Retrieval<br />
on a widely distributed and disparate in<strong>for</strong>mation source such as WWW [1] Both Ranganathan<br />
and Berners-Lee anticipated the tremendous growth and diversification of human knowledge as<br />
well as the need to link divergent notions together into a semantic whole [2 ]<br />
SEMANTIC WEB<br />
Semantic Web has been proposed by T.Berners-Lee, J.Hendler and O.Lassila. They describe the<br />
Semantic Web as being: “not a separate web, but an extension of the current one, in which<br />
in<strong>for</strong>mation is given well-defined meaning better enabling computers and people to work in<br />
cooperation” [ 3] . For the problem of content heterogeneity, Berners-Lee sees a solution in<br />
creative use of metadata and ontologies. [ 4]<br />
FACET ANALYSIS, POSTULATES AND SYNTAX<br />
Facet Analysis is a procedure <strong>for</strong> recognizing the Basic Subject and each of the Isolates of a<br />
subject and analyzing them in a preferred sequence in accordance with prescribed rules. The<br />
Postulates <strong>for</strong> Facet Analysis and the Principles of Facet Sequence are of as much help in finding<br />
out the names of the Specific Subject of a document and in rendering it in the Subject Heading as<br />
they are in establishing its Class Number. Also, the Postulates of Facet Analysis and the<br />
principles of Facet Sequence yield one possible syntax – that is, <strong>for</strong> the arrangement of the words<br />
in a heading and the meaning depending on such arrangement. [5].<br />
Using faceted analysis, it is not necessary to have a completely comprehensive understanding of<br />
the entities housed in a digital repository or the relationships between the ontological terms used<br />
to describe the entities [8]. Facet Analysis provides a conceptual framework <strong>for</strong> effectively<br />
describing and syndicating digital repository content. Application of Facet Analysis will allow<br />
libraries to anticipate the development of the Semantic Web and become key players in this<br />
environment. [2]<br />
MULTI-WORDED TERM AND MULTIPLE HEADING<br />
Generally in most of the documents, a subject has to be denoted by a multi-worded term. And<br />
this multi-worded term becomes a multiple heading. For example let us take the following<br />
titles published by University Press:<br />
118