21.12.2013 Views

READIT - 2009 - Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research

READIT - 2009 - Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research

READIT - 2009 - Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Proceedings of <strong>READIT</strong>-<strong>2009</strong>, Kalpakkam - 603 102, 29-30 Dec <strong>2009</strong><br />

FUTURE USE:<br />

Scaling the number of sources will require the support of the international science<br />

community in several ways. The first role the community can play is to assist in the<br />

identification of sources. No single individual or organization will be able to keep up with the<br />

introduction of new sources; thus, those who have the most to gain from a comprehensive<br />

science portal, the researchers, will benefit by identifying new resources <strong>for</strong> inclusion. A second<br />

way the science community can support creation of a comprehensive science portal is to assess<br />

sources already included in the portal as well as candidate sources. In order to facilitate the rating<br />

of and commenting on sources, a social network framework is being planned. The third value<br />

that the science community can provide is to create connectors <strong>for</strong> new sources.<br />

CONCLUSION:<br />

It’s said that only Librarians search and other find the in<strong>for</strong>mation in Internet. Thus even<br />

to find an article, document in the huge in<strong>for</strong>mation traffic will help one to locate in a single<br />

interface. As every librarian knows, the in<strong>for</strong>mation marketplace is very volatile and dynamic.<br />

We have witnessed an immediate impact in enhanced library services and increased the use of<br />

subscribed and open access resources. Federated searching tool will effectively offer the<br />

researchers to enter into numerous electronic sources in a single interface.<br />

REFERENCES:<br />

1. Arant, Wendi and Payne, Leila.(2001). Common user interface in Academic Libraries:<br />

myth or reality?. Library Hi-Tech, 19(1), 63-76.<br />

2. Cox, Christopher.(2006). Analysis of the impact of federated search products on library<br />

instruction using the ACRL standards. Libraries and the Academy, 6(3), 253-267.<br />

3. Luther, Jude.(2003). Trumping Google: Metasearching’s promise. Library Journal,<br />

128(16), 36-39.<br />

4. Tallent, Ed.(2004). Metasearching in Boston college Libraries: A case study of user<br />

reactions, New Library World, 105(1/2), 69-75.<br />

5. Wilder, Stanley.(2005). In<strong>for</strong>mation literacy makes all the wrong assumptions. Chronicle<br />

of Higher Education, Jan-7, B15.<br />

6. Newton, Verne W. Out-googling Google: Federated searching and the single search box.<br />

http:// www.aip.cz/download/Out_googling_Google.pdf<br />

Website accessed on 13.11.<strong>2009</strong><br />

7. Lederman, Ade. Science <strong>Research</strong>: journal to ten thousand sources.<br />

http://deepwebtech.com/talks/science research-journeytotenthousand%20sources.pdf<br />

Website accessed on 13.11.<strong>2009</strong><br />

8. Hurst-Wahl, Jill. Introduction to frederated search, October 2008.<br />

http://web.fumsi.com/go/article/use/3345<br />

Website accessed on 13.11.<strong>2009</strong><br />

9. Vendors In<strong>for</strong>mation http://federatedsearcblog.com/vendor-in<strong>for</strong>mation/feb.<br />

Website accessed on 13.11.<strong>2009</strong><br />

10. Next-generation federated search: critical <strong>for</strong> intellectual property research: A whitepaper<br />

by Deep web technologies, Inc.<br />

126<br />

6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!