21.12.2013 Views

READIT - 2009 - Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research

READIT - 2009 - Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research

READIT - 2009 - Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Investment(ROI), which is the future KM. The remaining parts of this paper analyses the<br />

characteristics of this journey of KM.<br />

2. KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT 0.0<br />

Knowledge Management practices in this era is not much dealt in the literature of<br />

Knowledge Management, since the term was not in existence. However some authors do<br />

mention about it as implicit KM. For example Wiig mention that knowledge has been<br />

implicitly managed as long as people seriously thought about their work and gives<br />

examples of early hunters transferring their expertise to their team mates and succession<br />

planning of wise men (Wiig, 1997). It can be observed from history that codification of<br />

knowledge and sharing of the codified knowledge was practiced when the technology <strong>for</strong><br />

writing and documenting was available. Also, sharing of knowledge in face-to-face<br />

communications, discussions and demonstrations were practiced since early civilizations<br />

and the knowledge was transferred from generations to generations. Even today there are<br />

secretly held knowledge that is shared only among close family members and transferred<br />

to successive generations of the same family. In the context of organizations also, the<br />

knowledge used to be shared among like minded people in<strong>for</strong>mally and among <strong>for</strong>mal<br />

groups and teams through <strong>for</strong>mal training and discussions. However the reach of<br />

knowledge was limited and consequently the benefits also. The KM0.0 activities can be<br />

portrayed through the following sub-systems:<br />

o People: People acquire the knowledge through experience and share<br />

among the peers. Peer to peer knowledge transfer was more common,<br />

though in<strong>for</strong>mal communities do exist. Both the source and recipient of<br />

knowledge see the value and benefit in the knowledge sharing.<br />

o Process: The process is in<strong>for</strong>mal and semi <strong>for</strong>mal. For example a hunter<br />

may transfer the basic knowledge of hunting to his son in a semi <strong>for</strong>mal<br />

way. But the same hunter may share his unique experience on a particular<br />

occasion to his fellow hunters in an in<strong>for</strong>mal way. In the organizational<br />

context the employees will share the knowledge with their trustworthy<br />

friends in<strong>for</strong>mally. Formal sharing takes place through official discussions<br />

and <strong>for</strong>mal training.<br />

o Technology: Initially the simple technology <strong>for</strong> writing only was used to<br />

preserve and transfer the knowledge, in addition to face-to-face<br />

communication. With the availability of In<strong>for</strong>mation and Communication<br />

Technology, knowledge preservation, knowledge access, knowledge<br />

sharing and knowledge transfer have become much easy, though<br />

unsystematic.<br />

o Knowledge: Both explicit and tacit knowledge used to be shared. However<br />

the knowledge pertained to only the core activities.<br />

3. KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT 1.0<br />

There are different opinions on how the term “Knowledge Management” has<br />

originated. Some feel that consultants have developed it to increase their revenue. Others<br />

feel that, it is just renaming of earlier data and in<strong>for</strong>mation management. Prusak argues<br />

that “ knowledge management like any system of thought, that has value, is both old and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!