READIT - 2009 - Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research
READIT - 2009 - Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research
READIT - 2009 - Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Investment(ROI), which is the future KM. The remaining parts of this paper analyses the<br />
characteristics of this journey of KM.<br />
2. KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT 0.0<br />
Knowledge Management practices in this era is not much dealt in the literature of<br />
Knowledge Management, since the term was not in existence. However some authors do<br />
mention about it as implicit KM. For example Wiig mention that knowledge has been<br />
implicitly managed as long as people seriously thought about their work and gives<br />
examples of early hunters transferring their expertise to their team mates and succession<br />
planning of wise men (Wiig, 1997). It can be observed from history that codification of<br />
knowledge and sharing of the codified knowledge was practiced when the technology <strong>for</strong><br />
writing and documenting was available. Also, sharing of knowledge in face-to-face<br />
communications, discussions and demonstrations were practiced since early civilizations<br />
and the knowledge was transferred from generations to generations. Even today there are<br />
secretly held knowledge that is shared only among close family members and transferred<br />
to successive generations of the same family. In the context of organizations also, the<br />
knowledge used to be shared among like minded people in<strong>for</strong>mally and among <strong>for</strong>mal<br />
groups and teams through <strong>for</strong>mal training and discussions. However the reach of<br />
knowledge was limited and consequently the benefits also. The KM0.0 activities can be<br />
portrayed through the following sub-systems:<br />
o People: People acquire the knowledge through experience and share<br />
among the peers. Peer to peer knowledge transfer was more common,<br />
though in<strong>for</strong>mal communities do exist. Both the source and recipient of<br />
knowledge see the value and benefit in the knowledge sharing.<br />
o Process: The process is in<strong>for</strong>mal and semi <strong>for</strong>mal. For example a hunter<br />
may transfer the basic knowledge of hunting to his son in a semi <strong>for</strong>mal<br />
way. But the same hunter may share his unique experience on a particular<br />
occasion to his fellow hunters in an in<strong>for</strong>mal way. In the organizational<br />
context the employees will share the knowledge with their trustworthy<br />
friends in<strong>for</strong>mally. Formal sharing takes place through official discussions<br />
and <strong>for</strong>mal training.<br />
o Technology: Initially the simple technology <strong>for</strong> writing only was used to<br />
preserve and transfer the knowledge, in addition to face-to-face<br />
communication. With the availability of In<strong>for</strong>mation and Communication<br />
Technology, knowledge preservation, knowledge access, knowledge<br />
sharing and knowledge transfer have become much easy, though<br />
unsystematic.<br />
o Knowledge: Both explicit and tacit knowledge used to be shared. However<br />
the knowledge pertained to only the core activities.<br />
3. KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT 1.0<br />
There are different opinions on how the term “Knowledge Management” has<br />
originated. Some feel that consultants have developed it to increase their revenue. Others<br />
feel that, it is just renaming of earlier data and in<strong>for</strong>mation management. Prusak argues<br />
that “ knowledge management like any system of thought, that has value, is both old and