26.12.2013 Views

A biological study of Durvillaea antarctica (Chamisso) Hariot and D ...

A biological study of Durvillaea antarctica (Chamisso) Hariot and D ...

A biological study of Durvillaea antarctica (Chamisso) Hariot and D ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

154<br />

analyses. Difficulties in tagging small D. winana plants<br />

effectively prevented measuring specimens shorter than 0.5 m. The<br />

inaccessibility <strong>of</strong> this species meant that censuses 'V¥ere made less<br />

frequently, so that it was difficult to detect any seasonal flu~~<br />

tuations in gro...,th rate.<br />

Storms during the autumn <strong>and</strong> winter <strong>of</strong> 1974 pxactically decimated<br />

the tagged D. wiUana samples at both Parititahi <strong>and</strong> Tautuku. The<br />

do.til that. were obtained (covering a period <strong>of</strong> approximately 18 months) ,<br />

revealed no marked difference between grOl.-1th rates <strong>of</strong> the 'cwo species.<br />

Total length <strong>of</strong> the fastest 9'rQ(o,ling D. wiZ lana specimens at<br />

Parititahi increased 40% in 18 months (from 1. 49 rn to 2.09 Ill) •<br />

Comparable measurements were obtained for similar sized D. <strong>antarctica</strong><br />

specimens growing at Ohau Point nearby. At the other extreme I the<br />

total length <strong>of</strong> a 2.8 m D, willana specimen decreased 51.4% in 10<br />

months, <strong>and</strong> again comparable figures were obtained for D. <strong>antarctica</strong><br />

specimens <strong>of</strong> this' size. During the period June 1973 to November 1974,<br />

mean percentage increases in total length, stipe length <strong>and</strong> stipe<br />

dia.meter <strong>of</strong> medium sized D. wilZana <strong>and</strong> D. <strong>antarctica</strong> plants (the<br />

latter bracketed) were 24.3 (22.1); 18.4 (9.2) ana 14.0 (30.3)%.<br />

Thus there appeared to be no significant difference between the grm~tl1<br />

rates in total length between the two species. However, there were<br />

differences in the growth rate <strong>of</strong> stipes. Stipes <strong>of</strong> mediwfi sized<br />

D. willana plants elongated twice as much as those <strong>of</strong> D. anta~ctica<br />

specimens. The converse applied to the rate <strong>of</strong> growth in the thickness<br />

<strong>of</strong> st.ipes.<br />

In general, D. wiZlana plants, like D. <strong>antarctica</strong> plants, grew<br />

at a rate inversely proportional to their size" Mean leng,th <strong>of</strong><br />

specimens comprising the smaller half <strong>of</strong> the Paxititahi sample<br />

increased O. 27 m in IS months, whereas there was a 1.5% decree.se in<br />

the mean length <strong>of</strong> specimens comprising the larger half <strong>of</strong> the sampleo<br />

Comparable measurements for D. willana at Tautuku showed that the mean<br />

increase in length over 18 months for plants longer <strong>and</strong> shorter than<br />

mean length, were 1.17 <strong>and</strong> 2.35 m respectively. At Parititahi, mean<br />

stipe 1eng th <strong>of</strong> specimens comprising the Slllaller hal f <strong>of</strong> the sample<br />

increased 18 em in 18 months (52.8 ± 3" 4 CUI to 70.8 ± 1.2 em), whereas<br />

the:ce was no significant increase in the length <strong>of</strong> the stipes <strong>of</strong><br />

specimens compriSing the larger half <strong>of</strong> the sample. Percen·tage<br />

increments in stipe diameter on the other h<strong>and</strong>, were about the same<br />

for all :rna.rked D. wiUana specimens 0

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!