26.12.2013 Views

A biological study of Durvillaea antarctica (Chamisso) Hariot and D ...

A biological study of Durvillaea antarctica (Chamisso) Hariot and D ...

A biological study of Durvillaea antarctica (Chamisso) Hariot and D ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

197<br />

holdfasts <strong>and</strong> those which \tlere attached t.o cOlnpsite holdfasts.<br />

Plants in the lat.t.er<br />

were usually lost when the holdfast mass<br />

rotted away. whereas those with discrete holdfasts had a<br />

chance <strong>of</strong> survival. Ten percent <strong>of</strong> all small plant.s in Area 6b were<br />

attached to holdfasts which nr,n,r to culling had supported<br />

four or more large plants. After about. six mont:hs all <strong>of</strong> these<br />

holdfasts <strong>and</strong> their at.tached small<br />

<strong>of</strong> IJ"'U."~~ \\Ii th discrete holdfast.s was low. In areas Sb<br />

<strong>and</strong> 6b. mortali'ties <strong>of</strong> these plants over a two year .I:""",.J..u....<br />

\'1ere 51%<br />

<strong>and</strong> 55%<br />

Area <strong>and</strong> the Ohau Point site were harvested a second tll~e.<br />

Data to the <strong>and</strong> the second crops are tabulat.ed<br />

below 9. 6} •<br />

IV<br />

Table 9.6<br />

<strong>of</strong> culled areas.<br />

(a)<br />

Area 5b Tautuku:<br />

crop<br />

culled 25<br />

October 1972<br />

2nd crop<br />

No. <strong>of</strong><br />

than 0.1 m<br />

No. <strong>of</strong><br />

than LO m<br />

culled plants (>1.0 m)<br />

Estimated total<br />

crop (kg)<br />

Mean<br />

(m)<br />

Mean diameter (mm)<br />

Mean stipe length<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> plants exceeding 5 m<br />

(m)<br />

(length <strong>and</strong> diameter)<br />

conceptac1es<br />

fraction <strong>of</strong> total weight<br />

462<br />

135<br />

403<br />

445<br />

4.5<br />

49.0 ± 1.4<br />

28.0 ± 1.2<br />

15<br />

9.2<br />

66;82<br />

35,6<br />

12,,1<br />

631<br />

150<br />

371<br />

455<br />

3.2<br />

37.2 ± 1.4<br />

25.0 ± 1.8<br />

1<br />

5.3<br />

S3; 5~1<br />

SB.7<br />

e.6<br />

(b)<br />

Original crop<br />

culled 2<br />

January 1973<br />

No. <strong>of</strong><br />

than 0 .. 5 m<br />

83<br />

Total ",'et culled (>0,5 m) 161.4<br />

Mean length <strong>of</strong> culled<br />

(m)<br />

2.3 ± 0.1<br />

Mean stipe diameter (mm)<br />

29.4 ± 0,7<br />

Mean stipe length (em)<br />

16,6 ± 0.6<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> plants exceeding 3 m<br />

14<br />

Longest spectmen (m)<br />

3.96<br />

stipe (diameter)<br />

45<br />

\\I'i th honey.combing<br />

57.0<br />

with canceptacles<br />

29.0<br />

fractions <strong>of</strong> total weight<br />

/...7<br />

2nd crop<br />

(all plants<br />

cleared) 10<br />

March 1974<br />

2.56<br />

51.0<br />

1.28 ± 0.1<br />

15.0 ± 0,5<br />

14.7 ± 0.3<br />

5<br />

4.03<br />

25<br />

29.5<br />

10.0<br />

4.5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!