26.12.2013 Views

A biological study of Durvillaea antarctica (Chamisso) Hariot and D ...

A biological study of Durvillaea antarctica (Chamisso) Hariot and D ...

A biological study of Durvillaea antarctica (Chamisso) Hariot and D ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

200<br />

however 1<br />

the articulated corallines, Ballia, Chondria <strong>and</strong> Cladophora<br />

exp<strong>and</strong>ed to form a red algal turf ben/een the holdfasts.<br />

Ulva also<br />

covered much <strong>of</strong> the rock in the lowe~ littoral. In the shallohPs,<br />

Margina't'iella <strong>and</strong> Lessonia plants had grown much larger.<br />

D. l.dllana holdfasts rotted more slo\J!ly than D. antaY'ctica holdfasts,<br />

<strong>and</strong> most were still extant four-six months later when D.<br />

W1:Uana \.... as releasing gametes (Chapter 6)" By this time the areas<br />

between holdfasts were almost totally covered by other algae, so<br />

that: there was very little substrate available for recolonisation<br />

by D. willana. Thus very few small D. wiZZana plants appeared in<br />

spring, <strong>and</strong> over the following summer (1973/74) there was no<br />

significan'c regrowth <strong>of</strong> the kelp. During summer, many <strong>of</strong> the D.<br />

willana holdfasts decayed, <strong>and</strong> the old holdfast sites were quickly<br />

colonised by UZva. <strong>and</strong> to a lesser extent, GZos8opho't'a.<br />

Some holdfasts in the subtidal rotted more slowly, <strong>and</strong> the<br />

patches <strong>of</strong> bare rock beneath were therefore exposed later during<br />

autumn <strong>and</strong> winter. These sites were colonised hy D. willana" By<br />

November 1974, small patches <strong>of</strong> 2-3 em plants could be seen grm'ling<br />

belOw ELWS.<br />

There was no settlement <strong>of</strong> the kelp in the lower<br />

Ii ttoral. These small plants \"ere I however 1 heavily grazed by<br />

fish, so that by May 1976 (41 months after clearing) there was only<br />

sligh tregrowth <strong>of</strong> D. wi llana.<br />

Instead, the area was dominated by<br />

M~gina~iella, Ca~ophyllum <strong>and</strong> Glo88ophora. Any D. willana plants<br />

\>lere small (less than 0.5 m long) <strong>and</strong> cont ined to the subtidal regions<br />

<strong>of</strong> the area.<br />

It is not known whether a lawn-like sward <strong>of</strong> D. willana plants<br />

would have developed if these areas had been cleared in the autumn<br />

or winter.<br />

The small clusters <strong>of</strong> plants which colonised some <strong>of</strong> the<br />

subtidal holdfast sites, suggested that this \-Jas possible, if<br />

g~azing by fish was less intensive.<br />

The second <strong>and</strong> much more recent D. wi l lana clearance was at<br />

(3 Ma .... r~17)<br />

Tautuku, below Area 7 on First Slope\ Preliminary observations<br />

BU9gest that a sequence <strong>of</strong> events very similar to that seen i'),t<br />

Parititahi, is occurring in this area, although there is a noticeable<br />

absence <strong>of</strong> the larger brown algae such as Mar>ginarieZta, Glossopho't'a,<br />

Car>pophylZum <strong>and</strong> HaZopteris.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!