26.12.2013 Views

A biological study of Durvillaea antarctica (Chamisso) Hariot and D ...

A biological study of Durvillaea antarctica (Chamisso) Hariot and D ...

A biological study of Durvillaea antarctica (Chamisso) Hariot and D ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

44<br />

separate spacies.<br />

In 1921 Skottsberg stated that D. <strong>antarctica</strong> bl~des were<br />

inflated <strong>and</strong> those <strong>of</strong> D. haY'veyi were compact, yet a photograph<br />

taken in 1907 <strong>and</strong> published in 1941 (Pl. 3) is <strong>of</strong> a D.<br />

ha~)eyi<br />

pla.nt that is clearly honeycombed. With :cegard to habitats, he<br />

stat..ed (1907:142) that D. haY'Veyi was 2l.pparently confined to the<br />

subtidal in deeper wa tel'::' away from the pm-mr <strong>of</strong> the surf; <strong>and</strong> ill<br />

the company <strong>of</strong> L@s8onia <strong>and</strong> MacY'ocystis. However, Dr R, Searles<br />

who has dived in many places along the Chilean coast claiuls (pers.<br />

conun.) to have found no subtidal DUY'villaea beds. In 1941 (pp28,<br />

57) Skottsberg stated that D. harveyi extended into the low littoral,<br />

<strong>and</strong> that it grew best on gently sloping reefs barely wCl,shed o't 10\-'<br />

tide, <strong>and</strong> in semishel tered places where the surf was too moderate<br />

for D, <strong>antarctica</strong>. This description fits perfectly such New<br />

Zeal<strong>and</strong> localities as Oaro Reef (Fig. 4.1f) <strong>and</strong> Wainui (Akaroa<br />

Harbour) ~l1here there are beds <strong>of</strong> cape form D. <strong>antarctica</strong>.<br />

These somewha_t contradictory accounts <strong>of</strong> D. harvey; above<br />

provide further support to my cla~l that the morphological differences<br />

are phenetic rather than genetic, <strong>and</strong> that they axe within the same<br />

species D. antaY'ctica (ref. d1apter 5). 1 have found no evidence<br />

to suggest that there is any <strong>Durvillaea</strong> species other than D.<br />

<strong>antarctica</strong> in southern South America. There is insufficient<br />

evidence t.o retain D. ha:t'Veyi Hook fil. as a separate entity,<br />

(9) DUY'viZlaea montagnei Kuetzing, Species Algarum p.505<br />

(1849) .<br />

](uetzing listed Lamina:ria caepaestipes Mont. as a synonym <strong>of</strong><br />

D. montagnei Kue'tz, His diagnosis is very sirnilax to l:ha t <strong>of</strong><br />

Montagne's <strong>and</strong> contains no features that are significantly<br />

different. The name is superfluous, <strong>and</strong> a synonym <strong>of</strong> D. mztarctica.<br />

(10) Sa:t>cophycus simplex Kuetzing, Tabulae PhyeoZogicae. Vol. 10;<br />

4, Table 71 Fig .. 2 (1860) ..<br />

"stipite terete cra.ss<br />

sirnplici sursum<br />

in phylloma giganteum crassissimum oblongo-­<br />

ellipticum, maxgine sinuoso-undLl.latum (nec<br />

dentatum) apice obtusum expanso.'~<br />

I sotype : BM: In h<strong>and</strong>writing annota-ted "SarcophYC:UB<br />

simplex"..<br />

A printed label gives the diagnos:.i.t;f

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!