A biological study of Durvillaea antarctica (Chamisso) Hariot and D ...
A biological study of Durvillaea antarctica (Chamisso) Hariot and D ...
A biological study of Durvillaea antarctica (Chamisso) Hariot and D ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
66<br />
that DurvilZaea extends several miles up Lyttelton a.nd Akaroa Har.bours<br />
into quite sheltered water.<br />
Wave action there is presmnably grade<br />
II or less. lUthough DUY'viZlaea does grollT in increasingly sheltered<br />
localities sou"thNards, this statement is apt to mislead because it.<br />
could convey the impression that there is a continuous Duroillaea b<strong>and</strong><br />
fringing the rocky sho:r'eline <strong>of</strong> these harbours.<br />
At Lyttelton both<br />
species extend no further than Mechanics Bay, less than 500 m inside<br />
Godley Head,<br />
At Aka:ma D. <strong>antarctica</strong> grows at Wainui Cfig. 5.6g-3.)<br />
B kIll inside the harbour, but the plant:.s are sparsely distributed an.d,<br />
confined to the end <strong>of</strong> a small promontory that is fully exposed to<br />
southerly swells. The situation in Otago Harbour is similar to tllat<br />
<strong>of</strong> Lyttelton. Both species extend no further than just inside the<br />
Heads (Bat-ham 1958:656 <strong>and</strong> own observations) .<br />
The distribution <strong>of</strong> DurviZZaea is frequently patchy even in<br />
areas subjected to grade IV <strong>and</strong> V waves. This probably reflects<br />
subtle diffex:ences in wave force. The horizontal distribution <strong>of</strong><br />
the t;wo species overlap, but D. <strong>antarctica</strong> is 'che more \... idely distributed,<br />
In areas subjected to ~~treme<br />
wave action, <strong>and</strong> in moderately sheltered<br />
areas, D. wilZana is relatively uncommon.<br />
On the very end <strong>of</strong> Seal<br />
Reef I<br />
<strong>and</strong> in the semishelter <strong>of</strong> the Fisheries Ttfuarf at Kaikoura,<br />
the kelp b<strong>and</strong> is almost exclusively D. antaretiea.<br />
(ii)<br />
Shore slope<br />
Wave force <strong>and</strong> shore slope are closely interrelated.<br />
As the<br />
shore becomes steeper, 'the kinetic energy <strong>of</strong> the ",aves is dissipated<br />
over an increasingly smaller area.<br />
On steep slopes, wave force has<br />
a high impact component, \oJhereas on more gentle slopes dr:ag forces<br />
are more important.<br />
On the north side <strong>of</strong> Tautulm Peninsula D. IlrUlana gl:OWS<br />
abundantly on slopes less than 60 0 , but is rarely found on steeper<br />
slopes. It is difficult to decide whether the relative scarcity <strong>of</strong><br />
this species on the steepest slopes is due directly to their steepness,<br />
or indirectly to very strong Have force that they receive.<br />
Observations at many places suggested both factors may be important.<br />
On many cliff shares there is <strong>of</strong>ten a no_rrow ledge at 1m" tide level,<br />
<strong>and</strong> any D. wiZZana are invariably confined to these ledges" This<br />
suggests that the kelp is unsuccessful on exceptionally steep<br />
Yet in some areas subj ect to severe 'Vlave force, plants growing on<br />
these ledge s are badly ba t-tered.<br />
They have fell' lateral l