26.12.2013 Views

A biological study of Durvillaea antarctica (Chamisso) Hariot and D ...

A biological study of Durvillaea antarctica (Chamisso) Hariot and D ...

A biological study of Durvillaea antarctica (Chamisso) Hariot and D ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

212<br />

CHAPTER TEN<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

10.1 SPECIATION<br />

~~ree<br />

<strong>of</strong> the four. DurviZlaea species are endemic to either<br />

Soutlleast Australia, New Zeal<strong>and</strong> or Chatham <strong>and</strong> Antipodes Isl<strong>and</strong>s,<br />

suggesting that speciation is centred in the e~treme southwest<br />

Pacific region. These three: D. potatorum, D. wiUana <strong>and</strong> D.<br />

chathamica are probably the result <strong>of</strong> allopatric speciation. With noobuoyant<br />

blades they cannot drift across the Tasman Sea or between New<br />

Zeal<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> the Chatham-Antipodes region, <strong>and</strong> are therefore geographically<br />

isolated. D. antaY'ctica, the only species with buoyant<br />

blades, is capable <strong>of</strong> drifting vast distances <strong>and</strong> is distributed around<br />

the southern hemisphere.<br />

Many D. anta:rotica populations are widely separated, either by<br />

sea or by long expanses <strong>of</strong> beach. Although plants drift vast<br />

distances (see Appendix 4) it is unlikely that the gene pools <strong>of</strong><br />

widely separated populations are completely integrated. Slight<br />

morphological differences between populations are to be expected.<br />

This explains why the stipes <strong>of</strong> D. <strong>antarctica</strong> in the southern half <strong>of</strong><br />

the South Isl<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>ten branch distally (Fig, 5.l1a,b) whereas this<br />

feature is absent in Northl<strong>and</strong> populations, <strong>and</strong> why only D. <strong>antarctica</strong><br />

from the isolated Chatham Isl<strong>and</strong>s have lateral thongs growing from<br />

their stipes (Fig_ S.lle-f). Closer investigation <strong>of</strong> D. ~~tarctioa<br />

populations on southern isl<strong>and</strong>s will undoubtedly reveal minor<br />

morphological features peculiar to individual isl<strong>and</strong> populations.<br />

It is interesting to speculate what the evolutiDnary history <strong>of</strong><br />

the four DurviZlaea species may have been. The genus contains a<br />

mixture <strong>of</strong> fucalean <strong>and</strong> laminarian features, <strong>and</strong> it is possible that<br />

it evolved from a stock<br />

<strong>of</strong>: plants similar to that <strong>of</strong> thG<br />

antarctic kelp Ascoseira miY'abiZis Skottsbg. which superficially<br />

resembles a small D. m~tarctica or D. ohabhamioa plant. According to<br />

Skottsberg (1921:50) it has asol:id ho<strong>of</strong>-like holdfast, a short stout<br />

stipe <strong>and</strong> a variably divided blade with conceptacles 0)1 both surfaces"<br />

It differs from <strong>Durvillaea</strong> in that its conceptacles contain chains <strong>of</strong><br />

r-eproductive Ol':gans each containing eight reprodu.ctive cells (spores?)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!