26.12.2013 Views

A biological study of Durvillaea antarctica (Chamisso) Hariot and D ...

A biological study of Durvillaea antarctica (Chamisso) Hariot and D ...

A biological study of Durvillaea antarctica (Chamisso) Hariot and D ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

196<br />

(d) Numex~cal density:<br />

While st.<strong>and</strong>ing crop increased, nillllerical densi ty rapidly<br />

declined (Fig. 9.1lc,d). At Kean Point densi·ty <strong>of</strong> plants declined<br />

from 7 OOO/m2 in the spring <strong>of</strong> 1973 to 1 OOO/m 2 in the following<br />

autumn. 'This. rapid thinning was partly caused by a fe\17<br />

plants forming a canopy above, <strong>and</strong> thus shading the majority <strong>of</strong><br />

plants with slower growth rates. Many small plants in the understorey<br />

were enveloped by the rapidly e)tp<strong>and</strong>ing holdfast t.issue <strong>of</strong><br />

larger , OJ::" were grazed by fish, isopods <strong>and</strong> limpe-c:s" Strong<br />

\lIave action detached many. Nevertheless, the density <strong>of</strong> plants in<br />

:cecolonising swards was sufficiently high that many holdfasts fused<br />

to form large composite holdfasts supporting 10-15 plants <strong>and</strong><br />

occasionally as many as 30 plants. This was a significantly higher<br />

number <strong>of</strong> plants po·r holdfast mass than in adjacent control areas.<br />

The size distribution <strong>of</strong> recolonising plants was similar to the<br />

size distribution seen in natl1ral st<strong>and</strong>s, i.e. large numbers <strong>of</strong> small<br />

plants <strong>and</strong> relatively few large plants meant that the size frequency<br />

curves \oJere strongly skewed to the left (Fig. 9.12). Periodic<br />

sampling <strong>of</strong> recolonising swards also revealed a second, although much<br />

smaller recruitment in the second winter (Fig. 9.12). There \lIas<br />

little evidence at either Kean Point or Tautuku, <strong>of</strong> any significant<br />

recruitment in the third winter season.<br />

9.4 ~FFECTS OF DIFFERENT HARVEST!NG TECHNIQUES<br />

(a)<br />

Culling was carried out in 4 areas: Ie, 5b <strong>and</strong> 6b at Tautuku ..<br />

<strong>and</strong> at Ohau Point. Plants longer than 1 rn were culled from area 5b,<br />

while in the other three areas the size 1 imi twas 0.5 m.<br />

Smaller plants grew rapidly after the larger plants had been<br />

In area 6.b, fur example, there xl7as a rapid linear increase<br />

in total plant length, stipe diameter, stipe length <strong>and</strong> holdfast<br />

diameter (Fig" 9.13). Similar results were obtained ih the other<br />

areas. In each case, the small plants in culled area.s grew much<br />

faster than small pla.nts in untouched O.reas nearby_ Hrn.1ever, they<br />

did not grow as rapidly as those plants recolonising areas that: had<br />

been completely clear.8ao<br />

When invest.igating the mortality <strong>of</strong> small plants culling,<br />

it "ilJas import.ant to differen1:iab:'! behleen those specimens \vith discrete

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!