A biological study of Durvillaea antarctica (Chamisso) Hariot and D ...
A biological study of Durvillaea antarctica (Chamisso) Hariot and D ...
A biological study of Durvillaea antarctica (Chamisso) Hariot and D ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
218<br />
Attempts to cross ... fertilise thonged ~'Jith<br />
cape form D. antaY'ctica<br />
in the laboratory \.... e:ce successful, <strong>and</strong> the resul tan t SfJorelings were<br />
indistingu.ishable from those obtained by crossing parents <strong>of</strong> the saIne<br />
form.<br />
Unfortunately attempts to transplant D. antaY'otioa behJeen senli·<br />
sheltered <strong>and</strong> very exposed habita.ts failed because fish ate all <strong>of</strong><br />
'che transplan'cs.<br />
Do<br />
Efforts by Asensi cmd zizich (1972) to shift sloall<br />
anta:rctica to neN habitats were also largely unsuccessful.<br />
The largest size attained by D. antaJ:'otica varies with wave force,<br />
but this need not necessarily be caused by differences in growth rate.<br />
Mortality increases with wave force, <strong>and</strong> the small size <strong>of</strong> high impact<br />
plants is because plants are very young.<br />
None <strong>of</strong> the high impact<br />
specimens collected on the most exposed face <strong>of</strong> the cliff illustrated<br />
in Fig. 5010 had conceptacles, whereas on the less exposed face 32%<br />
<strong>of</strong> the thonged plants had at least one conceptacle layer.<br />
The blades <strong>of</strong> D. <strong>antarctica</strong> attached along the upper fringe <strong>of</strong><br />
the kelp b<strong>and</strong> sweep back <strong>and</strong> forth over the abrasive zones <strong>of</strong> barnacles<br />
<strong>and</strong> mussels above the kelp, Cl.nd on sloping shores they bear the full<br />
brunt <strong>of</strong> each receding wave.<br />
They are also subjected to strong impact<br />
forces when swells crest over the back <strong>of</strong> the reef or slope <strong>and</strong><br />
approach the kelp b<strong>and</strong> from higher up the shore.<br />
As described in<br />
Chapter 5 the morphology <strong>of</strong> plants along the upper fringe <strong>of</strong> the D.<br />
<strong>antarctica</strong> b<strong>and</strong> differs from that <strong>of</strong> plants lower down the shore.<br />
Their stipes are <strong>of</strong>ten divided distally into several bough-like branches<br />
each supporting a major division <strong>of</strong> the lamina (Fig. 5"lla,c) <strong>and</strong> they<br />
have a more battered appearance.<br />
These features are attributable<br />
to the strong impact force <strong>of</strong> waves along the upper fringe <strong>of</strong> the kelp<br />
b<strong>and</strong>.<br />
The increase in the length <strong>of</strong> D. <strong>antarctica</strong> sti.\ ·~s<br />
down shore<br />
is an adaptation that prevents the laminae <strong>of</strong> plan ts a:'ctached Iowan<br />
the shore being shaded by fronds <strong>of</strong> plants growing higher up.<br />
gently sloping platfo:rms a tangled mass <strong>of</strong> thongs up to 0.3 m thick<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten accmnulates in the low littoral at low tide.<br />
On<br />
With long stipes<br />
it is possible for plants growing at that level to lift their laminae<br />
above such tangled masses,<br />
Honeycombing in D. <strong>antarctica</strong> increases down shore because at<br />
high tide the blQdes <strong>of</strong> plants attached lowest on the shore are beneath<br />
1-2 111 <strong>of</strong> water (depending on conditions), whereas t.l1e blades <strong>of</strong> plants<br />
at the top <strong>of</strong> the l