A biological study of Durvillaea antarctica (Chamisso) Hariot and D ...
A biological study of Durvillaea antarctica (Chamisso) Hariot and D ...
A biological study of Durvillaea antarctica (Chamisso) Hariot and D ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
73<br />
Result.s:<br />
Within a week all <strong>of</strong> the delimpeted areas were covered \'lith a<br />
diatomaceous film, predominantly LycmophoY'Q sp. POY'phYY'Q columbina<br />
appeared six weeks earlier on Area D than on adjacent control rocks,<br />
By October'kNovember 1974, thous<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> small «10 em) D,<br />
antaY'ctiaa had recolonised Area A 0.5-0.75 m above the kelp's normal<br />
upper limit. Plants grew thickest on the shady south faces. A<br />
laNn-ltke sward <strong>of</strong> small plant.s spread inside <strong>and</strong> onto the ro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
a shallow recess which runs along the southern side. 'I'he<br />
mean density <strong>of</strong> plants at that time was 47 000 per m 2 , Some small<br />
D, <strong>antarctica</strong> colonised the top <strong>of</strong> the rock, <strong>and</strong> g:cew amongst<br />
POY'phYY'a. These stragglers were O.8~0.95 m above the normal kelp<br />
level. No sinall plants were found growing above the kelp b<strong>and</strong> on<br />
adjacent control sites.<br />
Area B was not as easy to keep free from limpets as Area A.<br />
Nineteen large C. denticulata <strong>and</strong> C. radians ~ .... ere removed in December,<br />
<strong>and</strong> the tracks formed by their brolilsing were clearly visible. They<br />
had Obviously grazed away the plants growing highest on the shore.<br />
Where qra.zers were left, <strong>and</strong> the kelp was cut (Area C), the small<br />
D. antQ~ctica covered the rock between the decaying holdfasts. <strong>and</strong> a<br />
20 em wide strip above the original upper limit <strong>of</strong> the kelp.<br />
Despite the fact ·that some limpets invaded Area B. the upper lind.t<br />
<strong>of</strong> the recolonising sward in that area was, on average, 0.17 m higher<br />
than in Area C.<br />
The delimpeted rock at Ohau Point (Area D) was above the normal<br />
upper level <strong>of</strong> the D. <strong>antarctica</strong> b<strong>and</strong>. Several hundred small plants<br />
appeared on the rock, but there was no development <strong>of</strong> a lclWn-like<br />
sward. Most plants were confined to four small clumps on the south<br />
side. The highest clump was 1,8 m above the normal upper limit <strong>of</strong><br />
the kelp, <strong>and</strong> grew in close association with the high intertidal red<br />
alga Bostrychia a~buscuZa. D. antar'ctica did not colonise the contr'ol<br />
rock nearby, where there were numerous limpets.<br />
During the summer I the young D. <strong>antarctica</strong> growing above the<br />
normal upper letrel <strong>of</strong> the kelp b<strong>and</strong> were burnt <strong>of</strong>f. Mortality<br />
\'1a5 exceptionally high 1Ilhen 10\11 tide occurred about midday .. plants<br />
grm .... ing on the top <strong>of</strong> rocks were burnt firs't, <strong>and</strong> \'~ere soon follm!ed<br />
by others on northern, seaward <strong>and</strong> southern faces. By April 1975<br />
a.lmost all young plants had gone. <strong>and</strong> the rock (especially in Area A)<br />
was covered by Enteromorpha sp.<br />
By mid May most <strong>of</strong> the survivors<br />
xI/ere growing within a few cm <strong>of</strong> the norma,l upper lirrdt <strong>of</strong> the kelpo