26.12.2013 Views

A biological study of Durvillaea antarctica (Chamisso) Hariot and D ...

A biological study of Durvillaea antarctica (Chamisso) Hariot and D ...

A biological study of Durvillaea antarctica (Chamisso) Hariot and D ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

38<br />

lithographer responsible for Montagne's<br />

illustration (Pl.2), It reads: "Laminaire a<br />

dessiner, autant que possible, de gr<strong>and</strong>eur naturelle<br />

Cet echantillon m'appartient; i1 a ete happorte<br />

par M. Gaudichaud des iles maloilline et n'avait<br />

pas ete compris pa:cmi les cryptogames du second<br />

voyage. tvi D' arbigny en ayant rapporb~ des<br />

laminaires identigues avec celles de cet:te nouvelle<br />

e spece, j e pens e go' :\,1 conv ien-t de la publier dans<br />

son ouvrage." Montagne's illustration is <strong>of</strong> a<br />

cornplete pla.nt vJith. a large palm. The distal<br />

third <strong>of</strong> the lamina is split into several narr01lf<br />

thongs. The herbarium specimen described above,<br />

IIIhich consists <strong>of</strong> a holdfast, stipe, the basal<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the lamina <strong>and</strong> part <strong>of</strong> a 'chong could very<br />

well be the same plant. Montagne also stated that<br />

the specimen illustrated in Plate 2 had been<br />

collected by Gaudichaud, <strong>and</strong> this agrees ,\Ii th the<br />

information on the label,<br />

Areschoug (1854) recognised L. eaepaestipes as a synonym <strong>of</strong><br />

D. utilis Bory. Delepine (1964:142, PI.LA) sectioned the lamina <strong>of</strong><br />

the above specimen <strong>and</strong> found that it contains honeycomb tissue, a<br />

feature characteristic <strong>of</strong> D. a1'lta:retiea. Areschou.g (185.il: 16 [342} }<br />

stated that L. caepaestipes Mont. was the same as several specimens<br />

in the sample <strong>of</strong> 50 preserved D. utilis plants from the Falkl<strong>and</strong><br />

Isl<strong>and</strong>s that he has examined.<br />

Skottsberg (1907: 142) claimed tha-t L. caepaestipes ~)as<br />

the scune<br />

as D. harveyi Hook. fil. (described la'cer) r ;;>ncl that t.he Montagne's<br />

epithet took priority. In 1921 he stated t.hat L. caepaestipes \"as<br />

an intermediate form closer to D. haY'veyi than D, an tarcn':;ica. Naylol::<br />

(1954) regarded D. harveyi <strong>and</strong> D. caepe8 t-ipes as synonyms.<br />

There are no reasons why D. caepeBtipes (Mont. ) Skottsbg.<br />

should be regarded as an entity scpa:r.ate from D. ol1tapct.,:cQ,<br />

(6) Halymenia incupvata Silllr, Flora, vol" 22(5) :68, Table 2,<br />

F\ig. 42 (1839).<br />

Suhr's four paragraph description cont.ains<br />

inforr(k, tion concerning th e size 0 f<br />

the spec imen,<br />

its texture, colour <strong>and</strong> the shape <strong>of</strong> it::; 1amini'l,"<br />

He sta tedtha.t it: was 30-40 em long wi tll a ho:cny

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!