26.12.2013 Views

A biological study of Durvillaea antarctica (Chamisso) Hariot and D ...

A biological study of Durvillaea antarctica (Chamisso) Hariot and D ...

A biological study of Durvillaea antarctica (Chamisso) Hariot and D ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

69<br />

such conditions do noi:. occur on exposed rocky coasts around Nevi<br />

Zeal<strong>and</strong>. Ins<strong>of</strong>ar as factors responsible for the local distribution<br />

<strong>of</strong> DuY'vi"lZaea are concerned. salinity would appear to be Ilnlinport:ant:.<br />

(Vi)<br />

BioZogioo.l competition<br />

In many areas, <strong>and</strong> on the Westl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> I,o,est Auckl<strong>and</strong> coasts in<br />

part.icular, the mid <strong>and</strong> 10'l'ler littora.l is dominated by several species<br />

<strong>of</strong> mussels <strong>and</strong> Do antQPctica.<br />

At 'VJoodpecker Bay, Westl<strong>and</strong>, there are large beds <strong>of</strong> Per>na<br />

C!analiculus Gmelin. On the outermost rocks where wave force is<br />

strongest there is a b<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> D. antaPctioa with patches <strong>of</strong> Perna<br />

interspersed beuqeen the holdfasts. With increasing shelter (tot'lards<br />

the shore) the kelp becomes sparse, <strong>and</strong> Perna covers most <strong>of</strong> ·the<br />

available space (Fig. 4.1d). In semisheltered conditions. D.<br />

<strong>antarctica</strong> competes unsuccessfully agaihst the mussel. Plants are<br />

small <strong>and</strong> axe usually d.ttached to mussels. Eventually the Dux'viZlaea<br />

holdfast prevents the mussel from feeding properly, <strong>and</strong> the mllssel<br />

breaks loose. The surrounding mussel bed spreads outwards <strong>and</strong><br />

soon fills in the small space.<br />

It appears that in certain semisheltered areas, mussels are<br />

co.pable <strong>of</strong> excluding D. antapctioa I or at least preventing the kelp<br />

from forming a continuous b<strong>and</strong>. At other semisheltered areas,<br />

where there are no large mussel beds the kelp grows abundantly.<br />

In some places the distribution <strong>of</strong> D: anto.Y'ctica appears to<br />

be influenced by Ca:r>pophyZlwn spp. On very exposed headl<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong><br />

isl<strong>and</strong>s on the east Auckl<strong>and</strong> coast the lower intertidal is dominated<br />

by C. a:ngustifoZiwn. D. <strong>antarctica</strong> forms a narrow b<strong>and</strong> above the<br />

CaYpophyUwn, o,nd appears to be almost. ous'ted by the fucoid alga<br />

(Fig. 4.1b). Near Cape Maria Van Dieman, Johnston (1966:51) noted<br />

that D. <strong>antarctica</strong> dominated only in areas II/here ItlaV~ force was<br />

very strong. In slightly more sheltered places he found C.<br />

maschalocarpwn to be dominant. At Kaikoura, D. <strong>antarctica</strong> is<br />

abundant \'lhere wave action is strongest, but in many channels that<br />

are afforded some shelter <strong>and</strong> appeax' to be suitable habitat for<br />

lJur>vilZaea, the lOVJ

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!