26.12.2013 Views

A biological study of Durvillaea antarctica (Chamisso) Hariot and D ...

A biological study of Durvillaea antarctica (Chamisso) Hariot and D ...

A biological study of Durvillaea antarctica (Chamisso) Hariot and D ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

42<br />

D. ha:rveyi are within the size range <strong>of</strong> New Zeal<strong>and</strong> D. <strong>antarctica</strong>.<br />

Morphological features Hooker' used to define D. haY'Veyi,<br />

particularly the solid lamina, were applied to D. caepestipes (Mont.)<br />

Skottsbg. by many botanists. Lindauer et aL (1961) pointed out tllat<br />

there were differences bet\IIeen Hooker's <strong>and</strong> Montagne;s diagnoses;<br />

the main difference being between their descriptions <strong>of</strong> holdfasts.<br />

Montagne I s illustration <strong>of</strong> L. caepaestipes is. hO~lIeve:c > very similar<br />

illustrated by Hooker in 1847.<br />

Hooker collected several speci:(\1ens from the Cape Hotn region<br />

which he identified as D. utiZis Bory. Longitudinal sections<br />

through the laminae <strong>of</strong> two <strong>of</strong> these specimens 1 (Fig. 3.2d) \"ere compared<br />

with similar sections through two D. haY'veyi specimens; the<br />

lectotype, <strong>and</strong> the TCD specimen.<br />

Cross sections through the laminae <strong>of</strong> these four specimens were<br />

very simi lar (Fig. 3. 3), <strong>and</strong> closely re sembled drawings <strong>of</strong> c:t:"os s<br />

sections <strong>of</strong> New Zeal<strong>and</strong> D. <strong>antarctica</strong> in Herriott (1923) <strong>and</strong> Naylor<br />

(1949, 1953a).<br />

In the D. harveyi lectotype <strong>and</strong> both D. utilis specimens the mid<br />

cortical region consisted <strong>of</strong> a narrow zOl1e <strong>of</strong> loosely packed star-­<br />

shaped protoplas ts wi th thick ge latinous "JaIls (Fig. 3. 4e); while<br />

the inner corte)~ was more loosely packed <strong>and</strong> contained some inter~<br />

weaving hyphae z'unning longitudinally (a-a direction in Fig. 3.10)<br />

l<br />

<strong>and</strong> less commonly horizontally (b-b ) <strong>and</strong> vertically (c-c ). Walls<br />

1 1<br />

<strong>of</strong> both inner cortical cells <strong>and</strong> hypha.e \verethick <strong>and</strong> swelled to<br />

form a gelatinous matrix if rehydrated. The width <strong>of</strong> the medulla<br />

varied cons iderably in these three specimens, but its composj. tion<br />

was the same: a central region <strong>of</strong> much branched <strong>and</strong> loosely inter-<br />

1/1eaving hyphae separating the medulla into hllo plates <strong>of</strong> hyphae<br />

running predominantly longitudinally <strong>and</strong> hor iZOi1 tally (Fig. 3. 4b ,d) .<br />

The two pia te 5 were not a lvlays til e same width, ODe Bid",<br />

being only half the width <strong>of</strong> the other. Small vaclJole-like spaces<br />

oCCurred throughout the medulla (Pig. 3.4a,c).<br />

The D. haY'veyi isotype from TCD differed from the ot.her three<br />

specirnens by having relatively few interweaVing hyphae inth.e iOl1er<br />

1. 13M specimen annotated "Durvillea ut1:Zi.s Eory, Hermit Isl<strong>and</strong>, Cape<br />

Horn, l'.ntarct. Expo 1839-18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!