Pronomen Abundans and Pronomen Coniunctum. A ... - DWC
Pronomen Abundans and Pronomen Coniunctum. A ... - DWC
Pronomen Abundans and Pronomen Coniunctum. A ... - DWC
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
PRONOMEN ABUNDANS AND PRONOMEN CONIUNCTUM 103<br />
pronomen abundans. The following example comes from the same source 378.<br />
F 20-2 và èfJyá}"nç ra vee6' onee btfJaJ..J..oflÉvOV rov vt5aroç, èàv fJáJ..nç elç<br />
avra ra vt5we • Eeflijv C wvra, ovrwç ev{}vç àafJearwveral.<br />
The pronoun does not refer to an antecedent; it is just a connective 379.<br />
Byz. Alex. 4258-60<br />
Aomav àvaxw(!~aavuç náJ..w èu rwv èueïae<br />
àv~xfh]flev elç lreeov rónoV' oç na(!avrtua<br />
èui),evaa 7r;a(!eflfJoJ..~v èv rovup yeyovÉval 380 •<br />
5.4. Causes of the high frequency of the relat. connection<br />
The table in 5.2 has made it clear that in the Koine as well as in the<br />
byzantine period relat. connection occurs very of ten. Some authors are<br />
extremely fond of it, it seems. It has been said sometimes that this was<br />
caused by Latin influence 381, but Werner has rightly rejected this theory 382.<br />
In the following we shall discuss two phenomena which may have contributed<br />
to the tendency to use the relat. connection.<br />
5.4.l. The loss of particles<br />
It has of ten been noted that the use of particles diminishes rapidly<br />
in the Koine <strong>and</strong> in byzantine Greek. In the following two paragraphs<br />
a survey will be given of the use of connective particles (not of the emphatic<br />
ones, as they are not of interest for our subject), based upon some publications<br />
on this matter.<br />
5.4.l.l. In the Koine. In a study on paratactic ual mAttic Greek<br />
Trenkner speaks of the fact that in the Koine paratactic ual has replaced<br />
many connective particles, <strong>and</strong> adds 383: "On attribue cette portée du<br />
ual au déclin progressif, aux temps helléniques, des autres particules,<br />
Ie ual recueillant leur functions". In his study on the language of Diodorus<br />
Palm observes the same 384. He discusses, however, the connective <strong>and</strong><br />
emphatic particles together, <strong>and</strong> thus it does not become clear, whether in<br />
speaking of the paucity of particles, he means the connective particles<br />
or not. And there are many others who speak of the scarcity of particles<br />
in Post-Classical Greek in general terms 385.<br />
In one of the most recent studies on this subject Blomquist gives us<br />
some interesting information. He composed, for instance, a tabIe, which<br />
shows that the particle ual occurs more of ten in Thucydides <strong>and</strong> Xenophon<br />
378 Tabachovitz, Étudea, p. 15.<br />
379 Other instances of this fossilized Snel} are found in G26 <strong>and</strong> 014.<br />
380 For more examples see Christensen, pp. 387-8 <strong>and</strong> Tabachovitz, Étudea, p. 15.<br />
381 See, for instance, Schwyzer-Debrunner, p. 644,13.<br />
382 Werner, p. 275. Cf. also Tabachovitz, Pali., p . 99.<br />
383 Trenker, p. 30.<br />
384 Palm, pp. 37-8 <strong>and</strong> 116-7.<br />
385 See Blass-Debrunner, § 107, Radermacher, Gramm., p. 37, Mayser II 3,<br />
p. 115 <strong>and</strong> Schwyzer-Debrunner, p. 556.