31.12.2013 Views

Pronomen Abundans and Pronomen Coniunctum. A ... - DWC

Pronomen Abundans and Pronomen Coniunctum. A ... - DWC

Pronomen Abundans and Pronomen Coniunctum. A ... - DWC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PRONOMEN ABUNDANS AND PRONOMEN CONIUNCTUM 103<br />

pronomen abundans. The following example comes from the same source 378.<br />

F 20-2 và èfJyá}"nç ra vee6' onee btfJaJ..J..oflÉvOV rov vt5aroç, èàv fJáJ..nç elç<br />

avra ra vt5we • Eeflijv C wvra, ovrwç ev{}vç àafJearwveral.<br />

The pronoun does not refer to an antecedent; it is just a connective 379.<br />

Byz. Alex. 4258-60<br />

Aomav àvaxw(!~aavuç náJ..w èu rwv èueïae<br />

àv~xfh]flev elç lreeov rónoV' oç na(!avrtua<br />

èui),evaa 7r;a(!eflfJoJ..~v èv rovup yeyovÉval 380 •<br />

5.4. Causes of the high frequency of the relat. connection<br />

The table in 5.2 has made it clear that in the Koine as well as in the<br />

byzantine period relat. connection occurs very of ten. Some authors are<br />

extremely fond of it, it seems. It has been said sometimes that this was<br />

caused by Latin influence 381, but Werner has rightly rejected this theory 382.<br />

In the following we shall discuss two phenomena which may have contributed<br />

to the tendency to use the relat. connection.<br />

5.4.l. The loss of particles<br />

It has of ten been noted that the use of particles diminishes rapidly<br />

in the Koine <strong>and</strong> in byzantine Greek. In the following two paragraphs<br />

a survey will be given of the use of connective particles (not of the emphatic<br />

ones, as they are not of interest for our subject), based upon some publications<br />

on this matter.<br />

5.4.l.l. In the Koine. In a study on paratactic ual mAttic Greek<br />

Trenkner speaks of the fact that in the Koine paratactic ual has replaced<br />

many connective particles, <strong>and</strong> adds 383: "On attribue cette portée du<br />

ual au déclin progressif, aux temps helléniques, des autres particules,<br />

Ie ual recueillant leur functions". In his study on the language of Diodorus<br />

Palm observes the same 384. He discusses, however, the connective <strong>and</strong><br />

emphatic particles together, <strong>and</strong> thus it does not become clear, whether in<br />

speaking of the paucity of particles, he means the connective particles<br />

or not. And there are many others who speak of the scarcity of particles<br />

in Post-Classical Greek in general terms 385.<br />

In one of the most recent studies on this subject Blomquist gives us<br />

some interesting information. He composed, for instance, a tabIe, which<br />

shows that the particle ual occurs more of ten in Thucydides <strong>and</strong> Xenophon<br />

378 Tabachovitz, Étudea, p. 15.<br />

379 Other instances of this fossilized Snel} are found in G26 <strong>and</strong> 014.<br />

380 For more examples see Christensen, pp. 387-8 <strong>and</strong> Tabachovitz, Étudea, p. 15.<br />

381 See, for instance, Schwyzer-Debrunner, p. 644,13.<br />

382 Werner, p. 275. Cf. also Tabachovitz, Pali., p . 99.<br />

383 Trenker, p. 30.<br />

384 Palm, pp. 37-8 <strong>and</strong> 116-7.<br />

385 See Blass-Debrunner, § 107, Radermacher, Gramm., p. 37, Mayser II 3,<br />

p. 115 <strong>and</strong> Schwyzer-Debrunner, p. 556.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!