31.12.2013 Views

Pronomen Abundans and Pronomen Coniunctum. A ... - DWC

Pronomen Abundans and Pronomen Coniunctum. A ... - DWC

Pronomen Abundans and Pronomen Coniunctum. A ... - DWC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

58 PRONOMEN ABUNDANS AND PRONOMEN CONIUNCTUM<br />

child was dead <strong>and</strong> that it returns to life, emphasizes this change by<br />

adding the pronomen coniunctum.<br />

r 1022-3<br />

... ' AeeTovaa, "áTeXe nwç "'eO' Ó VOl"O"Ve'fJç<br />

è"ûvoç ónov eéyoflal và aov T 0 v "áflW Tatel.<br />

It is obvious that the antecedent Ó VOl"O"Ve'fJç è"ûvoç needs an (essential)<br />

relat. clause in order to be determined. Yet the poet confers a certain<br />

independence on this relat. clause by adding TÓV. The reason why he<br />

does so is, I believe, that he wants to show that these words are pronounced<br />

by the king with great emphasis. In this way he makes him underline<br />

the contradistinction between his own plans <strong>and</strong> the following story<br />

about the simpleton Pezostratis, who dared to speak of a marriage of<br />

Aretousa <strong>and</strong> his son Erotocritos.<br />

A 1443 fl' àç Ta' à"OAOVOä "al OéA.el &ï neáfla nov éJèv T' aAnt!;el . ..<br />

Aretousa is so amazed <strong>and</strong> so happyabout what she found in the room<br />

of Erotocritos that she cannot help emphasizing the content of the relat.<br />

clause.<br />

More examples of this kind are A 894, 1234-6, B 201-2 <strong>and</strong> r 1_2 192 .<br />

2.4.3.2. Nonessential clauses without a pronomen coniunctum<br />

2.4.3.2.l. 14th-15th centuries<br />

Chrono Mor. 299 HP<br />

( èaTeácp'fJ"e) aTov Tónov TOV vrè MovcpaeàvT ónov nOAAà èneOvfla.<br />

Id. 4371 HP<br />

ó àcpévT'fJÇ Tijç KaeVTalvaç 8nov noUà èneOvfla.<br />

Id. 4516 P<br />

Tà "áaTe'fJ "al rèç xweeç TOV önov noUà èneOvfla.<br />

Id. 4836 PH<br />

aTov M'fJ!;'fJOeäv ànéawaev 8nov noUà èneOvfla.<br />

It is perfectly clear that in all these instances the antecedent is definite,<br />

<strong>and</strong> thus the relat. clause need not be essential. Another thing which is<br />

clear is that this (nonessential) relat. clause is a fill-up: it is used four<br />

times <strong>and</strong> all these times it is not very meaningful. We have met another<br />

example of such a fill-up in Livistr. E 806, discussed in 2.4.2 193 •<br />

Mach. 172,9-11 ... [pyaAe àno riJv cpvAa"ijv TOV ale T!;á"o Te IIoAovta<br />

TOV vOTáewv, ónovxev nbpew ó e~yaç CJlà flaVTaTocpóeOV elç TOV aovATávov "al<br />

ècpvA-á"laév TOV wç ál&.<br />

Machairas could easily have written ónov TOV elXev nbpew "d., but<br />

192 Bakker, Some Remarka, pp. 317, 318 <strong>and</strong> 319.<br />

193 The Chronicle offers us two more instances: 1357-8H '0 1eóvroç Ó :naeá~evoç<br />

È1eeivoç Tfiç Taap.:návlaç - / ö:nov aè û:na elç T1jV àexiJv ËToVrov TOV f3l(3)..{ov. The Ms P<br />

gives a more correct version: ö:nov TOV ... : see 2.4.1. 5416-7H ... Ólà v' à.Uax-r11 Ó<br />

àrpÉvTTJÇ ó à&,lrpóç p.ov, / ó Ka{aaeTJç Tfiç Pwp.av{aç, ö:nov 1e(!aToiiv a-rYjv I1ó,lw . .. And<br />

again the Ms P has the better version : :nov T 0 V 1e(!aToiiv .. .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!