31.12.2013 Views

Pronomen Abundans and Pronomen Coniunctum. A ... - DWC

Pronomen Abundans and Pronomen Coniunctum. A ... - DWC

Pronomen Abundans and Pronomen Coniunctum. A ... - DWC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PRONOMEN ABUNDANS AND PRONOMEN CONIUNCTUM 53<br />

necessary: ÓJlOV combined with the preposition makes quite clear what<br />

the authors have in mind. A resumpt. pronoun would be superfluous.<br />

2.3.3. Conclusion<br />

If ÓJlOV is not accompanied by a preposition, but is st<strong>and</strong>ing all alone<br />

as a genuine connective should be, it is always followed by a pronomen<br />

coniunctum in the form of a pers. (or demonstr.) pronoun combined with<br />

a preposition.<br />

2.4. Accusative<br />

From the examples which have been discussed in the preceding paragraphs<br />

it appears that ÓJlOV was nearIy aiways followed by a pronomen<br />

coniunctum. There are a few exceptions : when ÓJlOV represents a nominative,<br />

it does not need a resumpt. pronoun. No instances of such a use have<br />

been found. We met some other exceptions in the paragraph on the<br />

genitive <strong>and</strong> dative. They just give proof of the fact that iron ruies do not<br />

exist in a language: there is always the chance that some person will<br />

say or write something that sounds or looks unusual. Later we shall<br />

observe some other examples to show th is 177. In this case we may rightly<br />

say that the exception proves the rule, the rule being that ÓJlOV (or ÖJlOV<br />

or Jlov) is always followed by a pronomen coniunctum except in the<br />

nominative.<br />

This rule does not apply, however, to cases where ÓJlOV represents an<br />

accusative. One may find examples where it is followed by a resumpt.<br />

pronoun <strong>and</strong> others where it is not. I shall give two instances:<br />

Dig. Akr. A 755<br />

Tà yeeá~ta > JlÓ fJ),meç elalv äeJlayeç dvbeeç . ..<br />

Chrono Mor. 7272-5 P<br />

> Qç rri5eav ön ij),(jaatv nore Ot Kam)'ávot,<br />

ÖJlOV rovç wvop,áCaat MeyáÄ'YJ Evvreorptav,<br />

è~e iae elç rov • A),p,veóv ...<br />

The only difference between the two relat. clauses is that the first is<br />

essential <strong>and</strong> the second is not: the subject of the first is not just "the<br />

falcons", but "the falcons which you saw". The subject in the second<br />

example is a group of well-known people, called the Catalans. Although<br />

we know who are meant, the author finds it necessary to give us another<br />

piece of information: peopie call them "the Great Company". This is a<br />

nonessential, nonrestrictive communication.<br />

In the next paragraphs it will become clear that in nonessential clauses<br />

ÓJlOV is followed by a pronomen coniunctum <strong>and</strong> that in essential clauses<br />

it is not.<br />

177 See 2.4.3.1.4 <strong>and</strong> 2.4.3.2.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!