31.12.2013 Views

Pronomen Abundans and Pronomen Coniunctum. A ... - DWC

Pronomen Abundans and Pronomen Coniunctum. A ... - DWC

Pronomen Abundans and Pronomen Coniunctum. A ... - DWC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

108 PRONOMEN ABUNDANS AND PRONOMEN CONIUNCTUM<br />

P. Mon. 104,14 (590 A.D.) ... ol"taç ... , 01) "ai 'fO äAAo fjflUIV àV~"êL<br />

, Ia"áJ{Jov.<br />

Kapsomenakis adds the following remark 407: "In dieser Zeit ist das<br />

Relativpronomen entweder erstarrt (01)) oder durch das Relativadverb<br />

onov ersetzt".<br />

6.3. In early Modern Greek. It is not surprlsmg that we do not find<br />

many indications towards the weakening <strong>and</strong> extinction of the traditional<br />

relat. pronouns in the texts of the 5th, 6th <strong>and</strong> 7th centuries. Even in<br />

texts from a later period, when they were completely extinct in the living<br />

language, they are used correctly. Only in some "vulgar" texts of a later<br />

date (14th-15th century) some cases are found where they are used<br />

rather oddly. Here follow some examples.<br />

Chrono Mor. 7968-9 H<br />

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (ó FVAtáfloÇ)<br />

lmáa'f'YJ elç 'fT]v IIeAayovtav "ai 1}'fOV elç 'fT]V IIÓAtv,<br />

l1.nee 'fOV l"eá'fet ó {JaatAiaç elç qroAa,,~v 'fOV ànéaw 408.<br />

Alex. rom. 43,14-5 ... evxaeta'fOVfleV 'fT]V lma'fOA~V aov onee fläç<br />

la'fêLAeç . . .<br />

Id. 51,17-9 "Hrpeeav "ai 'fO aTÉflflav 'fijç {3aatAtaaaç ..., ónov 1}'fOV TÉ'fOtaV<br />

TÉxv'YJ, (i drpf}aAflOÇ ov" elóev.<br />

7.1. "Oç(nç) ~ onov.<br />

7. CONCLUSIONS<br />

Since the beginning of the Koine the development of the relat. pronoun<br />

has proceeded along the following line: 1. the difference in meaning <strong>and</strong><br />

function of 8ç <strong>and</strong> oanç vanishes, 2. the forms ol, a~ <strong>and</strong> 1} are replaced by<br />

olnveç, alnveç <strong>and</strong> fjnç 409, 3. although the relat. pronoun oç, fjnç, 8 is<br />

perfectly clear now <strong>and</strong> should not be problematic any longer, it is supplanted<br />

by onov. Why onov, arelat. adverb which had nothing in common<br />

with the relat. pronoun 1<br />

7.1.1. Weakening of onov. During the same period the relat. adverb<br />

onov had gone through its own development. Gradually it was reduced<br />

to a mere connection (although at the same moment it kept its old local<br />

sense). This gradual change has been discussed in 3.1 etc. <strong>and</strong> 3.2 etc.<br />

7.1.2. Weakening of oç(nç). This process of weakening becomes clear<br />

especially in the relat. connection. Sometimes one gets the impression<br />

that the relat. pronoun is not more than a connective. See I 1.5, 2.1.2.2,<br />

2.3.2.1, point 3, 2.3.2.4 <strong>and</strong> III 5.4.2 <strong>and</strong> note 395.<br />

407 KapBomenakiB, p. 99, note 2.<br />

408 The MB Poffers TcWTav instead of llnee TÓV, the Ms T ö:rr;ov TÓV. For more<br />

exampleB Bee note 377.<br />

40g See I 2.1.2.2.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!