31.12.2013 Views

Pronomen Abundans and Pronomen Coniunctum. A ... - DWC

Pronomen Abundans and Pronomen Coniunctum. A ... - DWC

Pronomen Abundans and Pronomen Coniunctum. A ... - DWC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

14 PRONOMEM ABUNDANS AND PRONOMEN CONIUNCTUM<br />

Each case where a pronomen abundans occurs is an independent principal<br />

sentence connected with the preceding sentence by means of arelat.<br />

pronoun 8 . This is why not every independent relat. clause contains a<br />

resumpt. pronoun. This idiom does not have the relat. clause as its startingpoint,<br />

but the independent principal sentence! Thus one reason why not<br />

many cases of the pronomen abundans do occur is that it is used only in<br />

cases ofrelat. connection. And it is a well-known fact that this construction<br />

does not occur very of ten in Ancient Greek texts 9 .<br />

Kühner-Gerth obviously did not choose the right spot for inserting<br />

this idiom in their grammar. The spot they chose is a note following the<br />

paragraph in which is treated the phenomenon of two relat. clauses of<br />

which the second is not introduced by arelat. pronoun, but by a demonstr.<br />

or pers. pronoun. It would have been more to the point, I think, ifthey had<br />

inserted the pronomen abundans in a note af ter the paragraph on relat.<br />

connection.<br />

1.5. Anaphoric or relative sense ot the relative pronoun<br />

Originally the relat. pronoun had an anaphoric sense lO • When we take<br />

a look at what Kühner-Gerth say about the phenomenon of relat. connection,<br />

we see something similar 11: "Das Relativpronomen dient .. . auch<br />

zur Anknüpfung solcher Sätze, welche eigentlich als beigeordnete Hauptsätze<br />

hätten ausgedrückt werden sollen. Das Relativpronomen vertritt<br />

dann die Stelle eines Demonstrativ- oder Personalpronomens in Verbindung<br />

mit éinem Bindeworte, wie xat, à.V.á od. M, rele, oVV, äea . ..".<br />

This is an opportunity, I think, to discuss an example quoted by<br />

Kühner-Gerth 12, which may be regarded as the most ancient instance<br />

of a pronomen abundans .<br />

Hom. r 3-5<br />

~v-re nee x).arrT] reeávwv né)'u oveav6(h ne6,<br />

al 't" Ènet oVV XUI,Uvva !pVrov xal àOé(J(pa't'ov oplJeov,<br />

x).arrfi 't' a t re nÉ't'ov't'at Èn' 'Qxeavo io éoáwv . ..<br />

This example is mentioned . by them in a series of instances where a<br />

substantive or substantive pronoun at the beginning of the sentence is<br />

repeated by a demonstr. or pers. pronoun later. In doing so they seem to<br />

imply that the relat. pronoun al must be regarded as still having its old<br />

anaphoric function. And they are right. The comparison, as it is st<strong>and</strong>ing<br />

8 It is obvious now that the demonstr. pronoun T,p,«5e in Eur., I.A. 155-6 cannot<br />

be a pronomen abundans : 1. it does not refer to the antecedent, but has its usua1<br />

demonstrative function (see note 3), 2. the relat. c1ause has nothing to do with re1o.t.<br />

connection, is not even independent, but is a normal essentio.1 c1o.use. This o.1so<br />

o.pp1ies to the other instances mentioned in the same note.<br />

8 See Kühner-Gerth Il, pp. 434-6.<br />

10 See Kühner-Gerth Il, p. 226 o.nd Robertson, p. 953.<br />

11 Kühner-Gerth Il, p. 434.<br />

12 Kühner-Gerth I, p. 660.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!