31.12.2013 Views

Pronomen Abundans and Pronomen Coniunctum. A ... - DWC

Pronomen Abundans and Pronomen Coniunctum. A ... - DWC

Pronomen Abundans and Pronomen Coniunctum. A ... - DWC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

28 PRONOMEN ABUNDANS AND PRONOMEN CONIUNCTUM<br />

xal ToVTOV elvexa àxo"'ov~O'OVO't'JI aVTqJ (TOVTOV elvexa refeITing to the two<br />

functions of f-leTÉxetv <strong>and</strong> XOt'JIwveiv).<br />

Asclep. Tact. I 3 TO f-lèvlyyv{}ev (f-laxóf-levov) ..., f-lax~oiç .•. Xf!Wf-lE'JIOV ...<br />

Toiç Mf!aO't'JI, () xal 60f!aTorpÓf!OV TOVTO ••• nf!oO'aYOf!eVeTat 73.<br />

We see that in this sort of texts the pronomen alJundans or any redundant<br />

phrase is not very frequent. This, of course, may be caused by their rather<br />

plain <strong>and</strong> unemotional style.<br />

2.2.3.4. Pausanias<br />

Pausan. II 4,6 lç 6ij TOV ' AXf!oxóf!t'JI'{}ov TOVTOV àvwvatv lO'Tt'JI "Iat60ç<br />

uf-lév'YJ, div -riJv f-lèv IIeÄaylav, Tijv 6è AlyvnTlav aVTwv lnovof-lá!;ovO't'JI.<br />

A similar example, where the relat. clause is split into two parts, is<br />

CaU., Epigr. 42,3 in 2.2.3.2. In the example taken from Pausanias the<br />

position of m3Twv (in the second part) seems more natural 74 .<br />

2.2.3.5. Papyri<br />

P. Ryl. 154,13 (66 A.D.) 75 • •• aeovf!at ÉnTà f'Jf-ltO'v Tha(!TOV, div yslToveç<br />

T 0 V T W V VÓTOV nf!óuf!ov • H f!u>e"'el60v . . . x"'ijf!oç, fJof!f!ä . . . It is interesting<br />

to compare this sentence with one occuITing a few lines later: 16-7<br />

. .. yslTovsç 6è TOVTWV VÓTOV Baxxlovoç . . . x).ijf!oç, fJof!f!ä . . . In content<br />

<strong>and</strong> form the two look v~ry much alike. The only difference is that the<br />

fust is introduced by arelat. pronoun (foUowed by a pronomen abundans),<br />

whereas the second is connected with the preceding sentence by means<br />

of the connection 6è <strong>and</strong> the demonstr. pronoun TOVTWV.<br />

P. Oxy. I 95,16 (129 A.D.) ... 60v).'YJç ..., fjv lXTOU na(!el"''YJrpsv ...<br />

TavT'YJv TOtavT'YJv àvanóf!f!trpov .. . (see 2.2.1).<br />

P. Amh. II 77,25 ff. (139 A.D.) 76 .•• onsf! rpaVSf!Ov TOVTO lyévsTO Toiç ...<br />

È1I:tT'YJf!'YJTaiç ... (see 2.2.1).<br />

B.G.U. I 330 (153 A.D.) ... onsf! aUTO TOVTO vnonuvw (see 2.2.1).<br />

P. Oxy. I 117,12 ff. (II-III A.D.) lnsf-ltpa vf-leiv ... éáx'YJ Mo ..., È~<br />

div 6wO'stç Toiç natMotç O'ov lv È~ aVTWV.<br />

P. Bad. II 43,6 ff. (III A.D.) 77 lvsfJaMf-ls{}a elç TO n).oiov 'Uf!axoç TOV<br />

nOAtTtUOv TOV cplAov aov , önov lltEVeç È,,{}áóe ä,,' (= ällw 1) tv Tij ol,,{q.<br />

aVTOV, È"'alov fJá6ta TÉO'O'Sf!a. This time it is not arelat. pronoun, but a<br />

relat. adverb which is clarified.<br />

73 Oldfather changes 0 into b,' ö. Although he does deprive us of one of our<br />

examples, it must be admitted that the text as offered by him is more plausibIe.<br />

74 Cf. also Anth. Pal. VII 72 (see 2.2.3.2), which is similar to CaU., Epigr. 42,3,<br />

at least as far as the position of the pronomen abundans is concerned.<br />

75 HUDt-Edgar I 4. There is some chance that in this case (sentences like this<br />

of ten occur in contracts) the presence of the pronomen abundans is due to influences<br />

of the Coptic language. See note 413. For a treatment on these Coptisms see<br />

G. Mussies, Egyptianisms in a Late Ptolemaic Document, P. L. Bat. XVII (1968; =<br />

Antidoron Martino David), pp. 70 ff.<br />

76 See note 62.<br />

77 Quoted from Kapsomenakis, pp. 99- 100.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!