Pronomen Abundans and Pronomen Coniunctum. A ... - DWC

More documents

Recommendations

Info

82 PRONOMEN ABUNDANS AND PRONOMEN CONIUNCTUM déjà sûrement à l'usage qui a prévalu; nous en avons quelques précurseurs dans Ie grec classique". Thus Psichari gave a positive answer to the question we posed, but did this without giving any proof. It was Wackernagel who put this fact on record, saying 265: " • .. die Gleichartigkeit der relativen nov - Sätze des Neugriechischen mit biblischen Sätzen nach Art von olç èbóO'fJ aVToiç scheint mir nicht erwiesen". With the intuition proper to a great scholar he chose an example (Apoc. 7,2) which actually happens to be a Semitism 266. We shall, however, take good Greek examples like P. Oxy. I 117,12 ff. U cIJv bwaetç Toiç nal(j[olç aov tv U aVTWv 267 and see whether there is any correlation between examples like these and the Modern Greek idiom. 2. THE PRONOMEN ABUNDANS From the 4th century onward one finds less instances of the pronomen abundans. Almost all of them stem from hagiographic texts, i.e. from texts written for the lower classes. In literary texts it does not occur any longer: Paus. II 4,6 (II A .D .) may be considered as the last one. 2.1. Examples The following examples have been found 268: Paisios 84,21 1}v nç àv~(! ovóf-lan IIo(!cpV(!wç, ovne(! !;wv Ó f-la"áewç f-lá(!TVÇ elXev àyán'fJv f-leT' aVTov návv 269. Marc. Diac., Porphyr. 14,11-5 ... "ai (lAAOÇ vn'fJ(!h'fJç vewTe(!oç ovóf-lan B - tI '7 r- 1 "" 1 ~-~ , '1 a(!wxaç, OVTLVa EV(!eV f3' 0 f-la"a(!wç. " OVTa ev eaxaup "lVuuVep, "al Aa WV avvrJyayev, "ai àvaAwaaç noAAà . .. ToiiTov vytij èno{rwev. In this case the pronomen aburulans does not follow the relat. pronoun immediately, but later, in the third instance. It is something quite normal and also occurs in Ancient Greek 270. Sym. Styl. 30,24 "ai lbov 1}v na(!a"e{f-levov qJ(!Éa(! nA'fJa{ov TOV f-lOVaaT'fJ(!{ov, èv 0/ vbw(! ov" vnfj(!xev èv aVTep, nAfjOoç bi nvevf-láTwv à"aOáeTwv "aTep"et èv aVTep. Id. 48, 1 à(!XlATlaT~ç yÉyovev èv Tti Ev(!{q., TOvVOf-la 'AvT{oxoç, Ta bi na(!wvvf-lOV aVTov rovaTàç èAiyeTo, oç èAaArJO'fJ èv OAep Tep "óaf-lep T à ne (! i aVTOV. One gets the impression that the author changed his mind in making the subject of the clause not the man himself, but his deeds. Act. Xanth. 75,16 f. ... 'I'fJaov, ov ij OA.'i1plÇ TWV èv ~eVlTe{q. "lvei n(!àç evanAaxv{av, OV Ó "AaVOf-laç TWV èv alXf-laAwa{q. ènl yfjç ae èAOeiv èno{'fJaev •.., nO{'fJaov "al vVv lAeoç. 265 He did it in a review of Psichari's study in Theol. Lit. zeit. 8 (1909), pp. 227-8. 266 See I 2.4.5.6. 267 See I 2.2.3.5 and 2.3 .2.4. 288 Most of them by Linnér, p . 83 and Ljungvik, Stud., p. 28. 289 Linnér (p. 83) mentions another example: Act. Marinae 16.24 ... fjv yevvrr{}ûaav d.{}Vç :n:aeéc5wxev a V r iJ v elç dvareoqnJv. 270 See Kühner-Gerth II, pp. 432 f.
PRONOMEN ABUNDANS AND PRONOMEN CONJUNCTUM 83 The author must have written down this pers. pronoun, because he thought that it was not clear any longer that the relat. pronoun referred to J es us 271. The Chronicle of Malalas offers two examples, but both of them are quotations from the LXX : 147,11-2 M~ aè Wraiát"W Ó fJe6ç aov, èq/ cp 1te1WtfJwç el è1t' avnp, Uywv . .. (= Is. 37,10, Regn. IV 19,10). 156,15-7 OViWÇ Uyet ~vewç Ó fJeoç iep xetanp fWV Kvecp, ou eXeái'YJaa iijÇ i5eçtaç aViov iOV e1ta~ovaat ëft1teoafJev aViov ëfJv'YJ, ~ai laxvv f3aatUwv i5taeençw (= Is. 45,1). Act. Cart. 10,2 eli50v ávi5ea nvá, ou ëanÀf3ev {mèe iOV ifÀwv ~ ö'ljJtç aViov. Doctr. Jac. 68,5 li50v èyw e1táyw e1t' aViovç ~a~á, eç d)v ov i5vvf]aovTat eçeÀfJûv eç aViwv. Vit. Euthym. 87,22 ... iO aûtpoç iWV ft'YJie01tOÀtiWV. eç d)v nveç aViwv ov~ àvef3áÀoviO . .. 2.2. Semitism8 Are there any cases of Semitic influence among these examples? The two quotations in the Chronicle of Malalas may be so, of course: we have observed that the LXX teems with such cases 272. It is good to ask the same question with regard to the other instances. They all stem from hagiographic texts, which, partly at least, have been written by Jews. Another reason why these examples should be investigated on this point is that the writers of this kind of literature underwent astrong influence from the LXX and the NT. The following cases are, I believe, rather dubious. In the fust place Doctr. Jac. 68,5, and further Act. Cart. 10,2. Another case ab out which one may have one's doubts is Sym. Styl. 30,24, but in reading the context, one has to admit that the content of the relat. clause is emphasized so strongly that it seems better to consider it as nonessential. All the other examples may be considered as cases of relat. connection (Act. Xanth. 75,16 f. is a parenthesis). 271 Ljungvik (Stud., p. 28) mentions two more examples taken from this text: 75,31 f. '16011 Ta nÀoiov nEel ou )(aTfJEIp.ev lvf)á&, lv cp TcfHIP.p.év1) laûv1pVxfJ lv aVTl/J and 83,8 f. àvfJe Yele nç .. . nea xeóvwv nvwv . . . l)(1)eVTTE TOVTOV Ihóv, cp )(al nae{}évoç nç maTEvaaaa, 'Ij)(oÀovifu aVTl/J. The last case mayalso not be considered as a case of pronomen abundans : the relat. clause falls apart into two clauses, the relat. pronoun cp depending upon maTEvaaaa, aVTl/J upon 'Ij)(OÀ06f}EI. A similar case occurs in Mosch. 2976B: 'An1)À{}op.EV elç vQaalv, lv fJ yevóp.evol lifwaáp.E{}a aVTó{}1 p.Éyav )(aTà {}Eav p.ovaxóv. The relat. pronoun belongs here to yevÓP.EVOI, aVTó{}1 to l{}waáp.E{}a. 272 See I 2.4.4.2 and 2.4.4.4. Actually, the pronomen abundans in 147,11-2 may be a Semitism: the relat. clause appears to be essential. As in the other instance the relat. clause is nonessentiaI, it cannot be decided whether this is a case of Semitic infiuence or not.
Page 1 and 2:
VERHANDELINGEN DER KONINKLIJKE NEDE
Page 3 and 4:
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1. Definition
Page 5 and 6:
PRONOMEN ABUNDANS AND PRONOMEN CONI
Page 7:
PRONOMEN ABUNDANS AND PRONOMEN CONI
Page 10 and 11:
10 PRONOMEN ABUNDANS AND PRONOMEN O
Page 12 and 13:
12 PRONOMEN ABUNDANS AND PRONOMEN C
Page 14 and 15:
14 PRONOMEM ABUNDANS AND PRONOMEN C
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
22 PRONOMEN AlIUNDANS AND PRONOMEN
Page 24 and 25:
24 l'RONOMEN ABUNDANS AND PRONOMEN
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33: 32 PRONOMEN ABUNDANS AND PRONOMEN C
Page 52 and 53: 52 PRONOMEN ABUNDANS AND PRONOMEM C
Page 64 and 65: 64 PRONOMEN ABUNDANS AND PRONOMEN O
Page 80 and 81: PART III BYZANTINE PERIOD 1. INTROD
Page 92 and 93: 92 PRONOMEM ABUNDANS AND PRONOMEN C
Page 94 and 95: 94 PRONOMEN ABUNDANS AND PRONOMEM C
Page 98 and 99: 98 PRONOMEN ABUNDAN8 AND PRONOMEN C
Page 100 and 101: 100 PRONOMEN ABUNDANS AND PRONOMEN
Page 116 and 117: LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS A. TEXTS Achi
Page 120: 120 PRONOMEN ABUNDANS AND PRONOMEN
show all

Pronomen Abundans and Pronomen Coniunctum. A ... - DWC

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?