Study of Small and Medium Enterprises in Azerbaijan - IFC
Study of Small and Medium Enterprises in Azerbaijan - IFC
Study of Small and Medium Enterprises in Azerbaijan - IFC
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Chart 5.9<br />
40%<br />
Average percentage<br />
<strong>of</strong> entrepreneurs<br />
30%<br />
<strong>and</strong> SME who<br />
resorted to<br />
un<strong>of</strong>ficial payments<br />
20%<br />
while obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
permits as a<br />
10%<br />
percentage <strong>of</strong> firms<br />
receiv<strong>in</strong>g permits 0%<br />
29%<br />
Individual entrepreneurs<br />
38%<br />
SMEs<br />
5.7 Recommendations<br />
5.7.1 Reduce permits number <strong>and</strong> coverage<br />
This can be implemented <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g way:<br />
As a first step, the government should undertake an <strong>in</strong>ventory <strong>of</strong> all permits currently<br />
issued <strong>in</strong> <strong>Azerbaijan</strong>. Next, an <strong>in</strong>ter-m<strong>in</strong>isterial work<strong>in</strong>g group (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g private sector<br />
representatives) should be set up to review the exist<strong>in</strong>g permits through the “guillot<strong>in</strong>e”<br />
approach or an alternative deregulation mechanism. The “guillot<strong>in</strong>e” approach can be<br />
used to reduce outdated <strong>and</strong> redundant permits with a s<strong>in</strong>gle piece <strong>of</strong> legislation <strong>and</strong><br />
under a limited time period (see Box 5.5). Chart 5.10 illustrates the steps to be taken<br />
with<strong>in</strong> the “guillot<strong>in</strong>e” approach as well as criteria for reduc<strong>in</strong>g permits:<br />
Chart 5.10 Guillot<strong>in</strong>e process map<br />
Process<br />
The Cab<strong>in</strong>et <strong>of</strong> M<strong>in</strong>isters requests all<br />
regulators to submit complete list <strong>of</strong> all<br />
permits they issue<br />
Interm<strong>in</strong>isterial work<strong>in</strong>g group, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />
private sector representatives, reviews<br />
lists provided<br />
The recommendations <strong>of</strong> the permits<br />
review become legally b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Sample review criteria<br />
§ § § § §§<br />
§<br />
§ § § §<br />
Output<br />
Initial list <strong>of</strong> all permits issued <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>Azerbaijan</strong><br />
Comprehensive review <strong>of</strong> permits<br />
on list aga<strong>in</strong>st objective criteria;<br />
correspond<strong>in</strong>g reduction <strong>of</strong><br />
permits not <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with criteria<br />
• Only permits on the list<br />
cont<strong>in</strong>ue to exist<br />
• Process repeated for all new<br />
permits<br />
1. Outdated;<br />
2. Contradict<strong>in</strong>g to general market conditions;<br />
3. Issued for revenue generation;<br />
4. Issued for non-hazardous bus<strong>in</strong>ess activity;<br />
5. Duplicate other adm<strong>in</strong>istrative procedures;<br />
6. Used as source <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation when the<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation can be received from third parties.<br />
Aze r b a i j a n Bu s i n e s s En a b l i n g En v i r o n m e n t Pr o j e c t 83