11.03.2014 Views

School of Engineering and Science - Jacobs University

School of Engineering and Science - Jacobs University

School of Engineering and Science - Jacobs University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Author's personal copy<br />

152 B.W. Alex<strong>and</strong>er et al. / Earth <strong>and</strong> Planetary <strong>Science</strong> Letters 283 (2009) 144–155<br />

REY that can have valence states other than +3. The oxic nature <strong>of</strong><br />

modern oceans allows Ce to be readily oxidized at particle surfaces to<br />

highly insoluble Ce(IV), preferentially removing Ce <strong>and</strong> producing the<br />

very negative Ce anomaly observed in modern seawater. The fact that<br />

negative Ce anomalies have not been observed in marine chemical<br />

sediments (IF or carbonates) older than ~2.3 Ga indicates relatively<br />

reducing oceans, <strong>and</strong> an atmosphere–hydrosphere redox state for the<br />

early Earth that was lower than today (cf. Holl<strong>and</strong>, 1984).<br />

Whereas Ce fractionation <strong>and</strong> removal occurs in the water column<br />

<strong>and</strong> at the sediment–water interface, Eu fractionation occurs during<br />

water–rock interaction at high temperatures via reduction <strong>of</strong> Eu 3+ to<br />

Eu 2+ . The alteration products <strong>of</strong> these water–rock reactions discriminate<br />

against the relatively large Eu 2+ ion <strong>and</strong> produce a subsequent<br />

enrichment <strong>of</strong> Eu in the fluid phase. This Eu enrichment is present<br />

only in fluids which have generally exceeded ~200 °C, <strong>and</strong> has been<br />

observed in numerous vent fluids from hydrothermal systems altering<br />

oceanic crust (e.g., Michard et al., 1983; Schmidt et al., 2007, <strong>and</strong><br />

references therein). The large positive Eu anomalies in Archean–<br />

Paleoproterozoic IFs <strong>and</strong> carbonates possessing seawater-like REY<br />

distributions are fully consistent with significant high-T hydrothermal<br />

fluid fluxes to Earth's early oceans. Unfortunately, Eu anomalies are<br />

not suitable for mass fraction calculations regarding the mixing <strong>of</strong><br />

high-T hydrothermal fluids <strong>and</strong> ambient seawater, <strong>and</strong> only reveal<br />

information concerning the temperature <strong>of</strong> the REY source (e.g., Bau<br />

<strong>and</strong> Möller, 1993; Alex<strong>and</strong>er et al., 2008).<br />

6.3. Nd isotope ratios in Archean seawater<br />

Generally, IFs older than 2.25 Ga that possess seawater-like REY<br />

patterns have Є Nd (t) between −5 <strong>and</strong> +5 (Fig. 7), with much <strong>of</strong> the<br />

data describing the ~2.5 Ga Hamersley IFs (Australia). The remaining<br />

data are primarily from South Africa, though Frei et al. (2007) have<br />

significantly exp<strong>and</strong>ed the Sm–Nd isotopic analyses <strong>of</strong> Archean IF<br />

from North America; unfortunately, possible ages for these IF are<br />

poorly constrained. Most Є Nd (t) values for IFs older than 2.25 Ga fall<br />

between −1.5 <strong>and</strong> +2.5, similar to that observed in the PGB samples.<br />

Data for IFs older than 3.0 Ga are dominated by studies <strong>of</strong> the<br />

relatively few samples from Isua discussed previously. Considering the<br />

wide range <strong>of</strong> Є Nd (t) values observed in the Isua IF <strong>and</strong> the few analyses<br />

for samples clearly possessing seawater-like REY distributions, we<br />

consider the IF-G Є Nd (3.8 Ga) value <strong>of</strong> approximately +2.5 as the best<br />

estimate for average ~3.8 Ga seawater, similar to the conclusions <strong>of</strong> Frei<br />

<strong>and</strong> Polat (2007). The Pietersburg data are similar to older IF, though<br />

tending to more CHUR-like values, <strong>and</strong> support the interpretation that<br />

Nd was significantly, if not dominantly, provided by ocean ridge<br />

hydrothermal systems possessing a combination <strong>of</strong> radiogenic Nd<br />

signatures <strong>and</strong> strong positive Eu anomalies. This trend seems consistent<br />

until ~2.6 Ga, when negative Є Nd (t) values <strong>and</strong> smaller Eu<br />

anomalies (Bau <strong>and</strong> Möller, 1993) become common in IFs, though in<br />

only a few instances do Archean–Paleoproterozoic IFs display Є Nd (t)<br />

lower than −1.5.<br />

Focusing on the period near 3.0 Ga, the Pietersburg IF Nd isotopic<br />

evolution (Fig. 8) is very similar to that observed for the 2.9 Ga<br />

Mozaan IFs from South Africa (Alex<strong>and</strong>er et al., 2008). The consistent<br />

Nd isotopic evolution observed in the two groups <strong>of</strong> IF is expected due<br />

to the similar Sm/Nd values observed in IFs with seawater-like REY<br />

distributions. The reasonable range <strong>of</strong> potential depositional ages for<br />

both the Pietersburg <strong>and</strong> the Mozaan IFs would be from ~2.84 to<br />

3.1 Ga, <strong>and</strong> within this time frame the Nd isotopic ratios remain<br />

distinctly different. As initial 143 Nd/ 144 Nd ratios in the Pietersburg IF<br />

are negatively correlated with increasing aluminosilicate content<br />

(Fig. 4), associated crustal rocks displayed Є Nd (2.95 Ga) <strong>of</strong> −0.5,<br />

whereas ambient seawater during deposition <strong>of</strong> these IFs displayed<br />

Є Nd (2.95 Ga) <strong>of</strong> approximately +1. This value is ~3–5 Є-units higher<br />

than seawater contemporaneous with deposition <strong>of</strong> the Mozaan<br />

samples IF (Alex<strong>and</strong>er et al., 2008). These different Є Nd (t) values<br />

indicated for seawater likely reflect different depositional environments,<br />

as the previously discussed trace element data suggests that<br />

the rocks associated with the Pietersburg IF were generated in an<br />

Fig. 7. Neodymium isotopic signatures in oxide <strong>and</strong> silicate facies IFs older than 2.4 Ga. World IFs generally possess Є Nd (t) between −5 <strong>and</strong> +5, though most <strong>of</strong> the data are more<br />

positive than −1.5. The dashed lines represent Є Nd (t) values predicted for simple Nd isotopic evolution in depleted mantle <strong>and</strong> continental crust with initial Є Nd (4.56 Ga)=0, <strong>and</strong><br />

possessing Є Nd (0) =+10 <strong>and</strong> −17, respectively. Also shown is the Nd evolution in a depleted mantle as modeled by Nägler <strong>and</strong> Kramers (1998). Data are screened to distinguish<br />

samples which display seawater-like REY patterns similar to those shown in Fig. 6, <strong>and</strong> are from Miller <strong>and</strong> O'Nions (1985), <strong>Jacobs</strong>en <strong>and</strong> Pimentel-Klose (1988a, 1988b), 12 samples<br />

considered pristine enough by Alibert <strong>and</strong> McCulloch (1993) for calculation <strong>of</strong> possible Archean seawater pH values, <strong>and</strong> Bau et al. (1997a). All IF samples <strong>of</strong> 3.7–3.8 Ga age are from<br />

Isua (Greenl<strong>and</strong>), with stratigraphic ages as reported in original datasets. All data have been calculated using a present day 143 Nd/ 144 Nd <strong>of</strong> 0.512638 in CHUR <strong>and</strong> normalized to<br />

146 Nd/ 144 Nd=0.7219. The majority <strong>of</strong> the data fall between −1.5 <strong>and</strong> +2.5, <strong>and</strong> the Є Nd (t) <strong>of</strong> Archean–Paleoproterozoic seawater as suggested by IFs was generally between +1 <strong>and</strong><br />

+2 until ~2.7 Ga. Only the 2.9 Ga Mozaan IFs possess distinctly different Є Nd (t) values, which are similar to igneous rocks (rhyolite, <strong>and</strong>esite, basalt, <strong>and</strong> gabbro) from the South<br />

Africa–Swazil<strong>and</strong> border area (Hegner et al., 1984, 1994).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!