11.03.2014 Views

School of Engineering and Science - Jacobs University

School of Engineering and Science - Jacobs University

School of Engineering and Science - Jacobs University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

7.5. Carbonate rocks<br />

A common type <strong>of</strong> rock analyzed at JUB are carbonates, which are chemical<br />

precipitates generally containing low trace metal contents, similar to cherts. Carbonate<br />

rocks are dominated by (Ca,Mg)CO 3 minerals, <strong>and</strong> Ca <strong>and</strong> Mg may exist in solid<br />

solution within the carbonate mineral structure. As a result, carbonate rock samples<br />

typically analyzed may range from limestones (CaCO 3 ), through dolomites<br />

((Ca,Mg)CO 3 ), to pure magnesites (MgCO 3 ). All <strong>of</strong> these carbonate rock types are<br />

effectively decomposed using the HNO 3 carbonate decomposition method, though, as<br />

noted previously, any accessory aluminosilicate minerals <strong>and</strong> refractory organic<br />

carbon are relatively unaffected by dissolution with HNO 3 .<br />

This section discusses the application <strong>of</strong> both decomposition methods (HF-<br />

HClO 4 <strong>and</strong> HNO 3 ) to carbonate rocks, <strong>and</strong> describes the applicability <strong>and</strong> accuracy <strong>of</strong><br />

these methods with respect to specific elements <strong>of</strong> interest. As the literature reference<br />

values are generally determined by analytical methods capable <strong>of</strong> thoroughly<br />

characterizing the whole-rock abundance <strong>of</strong> elements, the inability <strong>of</strong> the carbonate<br />

decomposition method to dissolve refractory silicate minerals results in ‘poor’<br />

analytical results for elements typically hosted within these minerals (e.g., Zr, Nb, Hf,<br />

Ta, Th, among others). It is therefore necessary to first examine data obtained using<br />

the HF-HClO 4 whole-rock decomposition method, as these data are most comparable<br />

to the average reference value calculated from literature sources.<br />

The most commonly utilized carbonate CRM is the dolomite JDo-1, issued by<br />

the Geological Survey <strong>of</strong> Japan (GSJ). The JDo-1 dolomite is 34.0% CaO <strong>and</strong> 18.5%<br />

MgO, with only trace amounts <strong>of</strong> Al, Mn, or Fe. Therefore, major element<br />

interferences would be expected from the high Ca <strong>and</strong> Mg contents, <strong>and</strong> should<br />

primarily affect determinations <strong>of</strong> Co, Ni, Zr, <strong>and</strong> Nb. Figure 19 presents comparisons<br />

between concentrations determined at JUB using the HF-HClO 4 decomposition<br />

method with the average reference values. Determinations <strong>of</strong> Co <strong>and</strong> Ni are not shown<br />

in Fig. 19, as the elements are severely compromised in HCl acid matrices by<br />

interferences generated from Mg <strong>and</strong> Ca (Table 4). The JUB measured Co <strong>of</strong> 1.46<br />

mg/kg is several times higher than the average reference value <strong>of</strong> 0.234 mg/kg, <strong>and</strong><br />

measured Ni is 11.1 mg/kg, also several times higher than the reference value <strong>of</strong> 2.9<br />

mg/kg.<br />

Of the remaining elements Ti, Sr, Y, the REE, <strong>and</strong> W show good agreement<br />

with the average reference values, <strong>and</strong> the reference values themselves are consistent<br />

44

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!