11.03.2014 Views

School of Engineering and Science - Jacobs University

School of Engineering and Science - Jacobs University

School of Engineering and Science - Jacobs University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1.50 FeR-4 (n=2)<br />

1.25<br />

JUB / reference average<br />

1.00<br />

0.75<br />

0.50<br />

0.25<br />

0.00<br />

Sc Ti Co Ni Rb Sr Y Zr Nb Mo Cs Ba La Ce Pr Nd Sm Eu Gd Tb Dy Ho Er Tm Yb Lu Hf Ta W Pb Th U<br />

Figure 13. Accuracy estimation for ICPMS analysis <strong>of</strong> iron-formation FeR-4, where n equals the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> separate HF-HClO 4 sample decompositions <strong>and</strong> ICPMS analyses in 0.5 M HCl. Grey bars<br />

represent variability in the calculated ratio that is due solely to uncertainty in the reference average.<br />

Vertical lines represent the variability in the calculated ratio due to the uncertainty <strong>of</strong> the JUB data, <strong>and</strong><br />

all data are presented in App. 1. Good agreement is observed for most elements, with exceptions being<br />

Sc, Ti, Co, Ni <strong>and</strong> U. Reference data for Nb, Mo, <strong>and</strong> Ta are not shown, <strong>and</strong> are available only from a<br />

single published study by Yu et al. (2001), who found highly variable results for these elements when<br />

comparing two different sample decomposition methods (HF-HClO 4 versus HF-H 2 SO 4 ). See text for<br />

details.<br />

Consequently, many trace metals have significantly lower concentrations in FeR-4<br />

(e.g., Sc, Zr, Nb, the REE, Hf, Th). The precision <strong>of</strong> the JUB data is poorly<br />

constrained by the limited number <strong>of</strong> analyses, though it seems comparable to, if not<br />

significantly better than, the variation observed in literature reference values. The<br />

relative accuracy <strong>of</strong> the FeR-4 data is presented in Figure 13, <strong>and</strong> is somewhat better<br />

than that observed for FeR-2, except for elements with the lowest <strong>and</strong> highest masses<br />

(Sc, Ti, Co, Ni, <strong>and</strong> U). Poor results for Sc are not unexpected as Sc literature values<br />

for FeR-4 range from 1.1-1.5 mg/kg, which is similar in magnitude to the IQL<br />

observed for Sc (~0.8 mg/kg, Table 2).<br />

However, Ti, Co, <strong>and</strong> Ni are all present in FeR-4 at concentrations well above<br />

their respective IQLs using the ICPMS methods described here (Fig. 4), so low<br />

signal-to-noise ratios are not expected to adversely affect determinations <strong>of</strong> these<br />

elements. For Co <strong>and</strong> Ni, the literature data are reported to only one significant digit<br />

<strong>and</strong> concentrations <strong>of</strong> these two elements are apparently low (2 <strong>and</strong> 8 mg/kg,<br />

35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!