11.03.2014 Views

School of Engineering and Science - Jacobs University

School of Engineering and Science - Jacobs University

School of Engineering and Science - Jacobs University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

0.90, corresponding to an anomalous increase in measured analyte intensities in the<br />

sample, to 1.10, indicating an anomalous decrease in measured analyte intensities.<br />

Experience has shown that analytical accuracy is <strong>of</strong>ten compromised when IS<br />

correction factors deviate from unity by more than ~15% (i.e., 1.15), <strong>and</strong> it<br />

may be necessary to re-analyze the samples using a different dilution factor to<br />

minimize matrix <strong>and</strong>/or drift effects.<br />

Following internal st<strong>and</strong>ard corrections, interference corrections for<br />

polyatomic species are applied to the sample data. These interference corrections are<br />

applied only to elements with atomic masses between 151 (Eu) <strong>and</strong> 183 (W). A<br />

detailed treatment <strong>of</strong> the determination <strong>and</strong> application <strong>of</strong> these interference<br />

corrections is beyond the scope <strong>of</strong> this discussion, <strong>and</strong> the reader is referred to Dulski<br />

(1994). The last correction applied to the sample data before calculating elemental<br />

concentrations involves subtracting the internal st<strong>and</strong>ard <strong>and</strong> interference corrected<br />

blank contribution, which would be due to the reagents used in preparing the samples,<br />

<strong>and</strong>/or from any laboratory procedures.<br />

4.5. Analytical blanks <strong>and</strong> quantification limits<br />

Two blank contributions may be defined for the described ICPMS methods.<br />

The first is the acid blank value, which is used for calculating the instrument<br />

detection <strong>and</strong> quantification limits (IDLs <strong>and</strong> IQLs). As all ICPMS solutions are<br />

analyzed in a 0.5 M acid matrix (either HCl or HNO 3 ), the acid blank is simply the<br />

purest 0.5 M acid solution that is capable <strong>of</strong> being produced within the JUB<br />

Geochemistry Lab. Analyses <strong>of</strong> the acid blank allows the calculation <strong>of</strong> IDLs <strong>and</strong><br />

IQLs for any given element, which represent the best achievable (ideal) ICPMS<br />

sensitivity using the available laboratory reagents. The IDL <strong>and</strong> IQL equal 3x <strong>and</strong> 10x<br />

the st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation <strong>of</strong> the acid blank, respectively (MacDougall <strong>and</strong> Crummett,<br />

1980), <strong>and</strong> are best characterized through long term, repeated analyses <strong>of</strong> the acid<br />

blank, as daily fluctuations in instrument sensitivity are common. It is important to<br />

note that IDLs <strong>and</strong> IQLs calculated from the acid blank are not equivalent to detection<br />

<strong>and</strong> quantification limits in a solid sample, that is, in a rock or a mineral. As all solid<br />

samples are highly diluted before ICPMS analyses, IDLs <strong>and</strong> IQLs determined for<br />

solid samples equal the acid blank multiplied by the appropriate dilution factor. Table<br />

2 lists long term average IQLs in solid samples for 0.5 M HCl <strong>and</strong> 0.5 M HNO 3 acid<br />

matrices.<br />

15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!