11.03.2014 Views

School of Engineering and Science - Jacobs University

School of Engineering and Science - Jacobs University

School of Engineering and Science - Jacobs University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The second blank contribution to ICPMS analyses is the method blank. The<br />

method blank is a solution that has been processed in exactly the same manner as a<br />

sample during the decomposition method, <strong>and</strong> represents the contamination added to<br />

a sample as a result <strong>of</strong> the decomposition method <strong>and</strong> subsequent dilution in acid.<br />

While significant amounts <strong>of</strong> concentrated acid are used in the decomposition<br />

methods, these acids (in combination with contamination from labware) contribute<br />

insignificant amounts <strong>of</strong> trace metals to rocks typically analyzed, even for trace<br />

metal-poor samples like iron-formations <strong>and</strong> dolomites (Fig. 4). Method blank values<br />

are determined for every ICPMS analysis to monitor possible contamination sources,<br />

but as a result <strong>of</strong> the above observations, ICPMS data are blank corrected by<br />

subtracting the acid blank intensities. Only in instances where method blank values<br />

are significantly higher than those observed in Fig. 4 are blank corrections performed<br />

using the method blank intensities. The reasoning for this approach is as follows;<br />

since the method blanks are typically below the IQLs determined from the acid<br />

blanks, the method blank is not quantifiable. Only when method blanks exceed the<br />

acid blank IQL are they used for the blank correction. It should be noted that with<br />

regard to the carbonate decomposition method, many refractory elements (e.g., Ti,<br />

Nb, Ta) are not suitable for quantification, as they are expected to be primarily hosted<br />

in silicate-bearing phases that are resistant to dissolution with nitric acid, <strong>and</strong> in<br />

particular the poor IQLs for Sc mean that it is generally not quantifiable in trace<br />

metal-poor samples regardless <strong>of</strong> the decomposition method used (Fig. 4).<br />

5. Analytical precision<br />

For the analyses conducted within the Geochemistry Lab at JUB, analytical<br />

precision may be defined in different ways. The highest degree <strong>of</strong> precision is<br />

expected when considering only the 60 mass scans performed during ICPMS analysis<br />

<strong>of</strong> a single sample solution. If this sample solution is periodically re-measured with<br />

time during an ICPMS run, i.e., by occasionally returning the autosampler probe to<br />

the vial containing the solution, then analytical precision would be expected to<br />

decrease. Further decreases in analytical precision should occur if one considers<br />

repeated analyses <strong>of</strong> the same sample solution on different days, or repeated acid<br />

decompositions <strong>of</strong> the same sample powder, with the decreasing precision reflecting<br />

16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!