23.06.2012 Views

Section One

Section One

Section One

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

32<br />

non-energy commodity prices, especially cement and steel, which account on average<br />

for close to half of upstream costs; 6 the nature of the relationship between prices<br />

and costs, for example, higher prices encourage activity in higher cost areas, but this<br />

is not necessarily indicative of a change in cost structure; 7 and the rate and nature<br />

of technological progress.<br />

All this shows that marginal cost estimates might provide an imperfect signal for<br />

long-term price paths. This route nevertheless remains a key element in making sensible<br />

assumptions for sustainable long-term prices. There could be many plausible<br />

outcomes of the conflicting pressures between technology and depletion; however,<br />

the available evidence of both current cost structures and the ability of technology<br />

to bring costs down, especially for non-conventional resources, as well as to expand<br />

the resource base, continues to be a key driver in the assessment of Reference Case<br />

oil price assumptions.<br />

now have a far lower impact upon the global economy than in the past, given that<br />

today less oil is now used to generate each dollar of gross domestic product (GDP).<br />

For example, over the three decades between 1980 and 2010, OECD oil intensity fell<br />

by 49%, while in developing countries it fell by 30%. Research into the past impacts<br />

of oil prices on economic growth also suggests that monetary policy responses at the<br />

time of earlier price spikes were responsible for much of the growth slowdown. 8 Moreover,<br />

there is growing recognition that high oil prices have had little impact upon the<br />

economy and the recent recession.<br />

It has also become accepted that oil price movements have relatively low direct<br />

impacts – though not zero – upon oil demand: high tax levels; exhausted<br />

options for substitution away from oil; and, low price elasticities in the transportation<br />

sector are key factors in this regard. However, there is also the often neglected<br />

impact of large price changes upon demand. This driver can be described as the<br />

asymmetric price elasticity of oil demand, since price increases affect demand differently<br />

to price falls, but it is also the result of non-linear elasticity. Thus, this<br />

poses an additional technical limit to how high oil prices can be assumed to go in<br />

the Reference Case.<br />

Attention has also been paid to the impact of the dollar on prices. It is true that<br />

there has been a substantial weakening of the dollar in recent years. In January 2003,<br />

the €/$ rate averaged 0.94, but this had fallen to 0.68 by January 2008, a depreciation<br />

of close to one-third. This is one factor behind the gradual upward revision to<br />

oil prices that has been underway in recent years. Nevertheless, there is no reason to<br />

attribute the change in price behaviour since the release of the last WOO to changes

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!