23.06.2012 Views

Section One

Section One

Section One

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

132<br />

early support given to Brazil’s biofuels industry. In the current economic climate, this<br />

could potentially go two ways. It could mean that unemployment policy becomes<br />

increasingly linked to energy policy to generate jobs growth. Indeed, this has already<br />

been very visibly in the case of Germany, where domestic coal has been historically<br />

subsidised in order to protect jobs. However, there is the possibility that government<br />

support for such industries might be withdrawn.<br />

Given all these factors, alternative paths to the Reference Case are increasingly<br />

likely. The ATTP scenario therefore makes a number of assumptions to explore the possible<br />

impacts of feasible and realistic alternatives to these. Specifically, it is assumed that:<br />

• Efficiency improvements to internal combustion engines, accelerated shifts to<br />

hybrids, and in some parts of the world electric vehicles, a more rapid penetration<br />

of natural gas in the transportation sector, again in some parts of the world,<br />

and an accelerated move to regulate efficiencies in commercial vehicles, lead to<br />

an additional 0.5% p.a. improvement in the average oil use per vehicle;<br />

• Concerns over import dependency leads to more aggressive support for alternative<br />

fuels, in particular biofuels, CTLs, biomass-to-liquids (BTLs) and CNG;<br />

• Regulation of international marine bunkers leads to more efficient fuel use in<br />

this sector, also at an additional rate of 0.5% p.a. This will stem increasingly<br />

from stringent regulation, as well as alternative assumptions for how the international<br />

marine industry responds to higher oil prices than in the past, for<br />

example, through greater emphasis on ‘slow-steaming’; and<br />

• Increased efficiencies will lead to reduced costs of travel, and, therefore, the potential<br />

for some ‘rebound effect’ in the form of higher transportation activity.<br />

Table 4.1<br />

Oil demand in the ATTP scenario mb/d<br />

2015 2020 2025 2030 2035<br />

OECD 45.7 44.3 42.7 41.0 39.3<br />

Developing countries 41.3 46.1 50.2 53.9 57.6<br />

Transition economies 5.0 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5<br />

World 92.0 95.6 98.2 100.3 102.3<br />

Difference from Reference Case<br />

OECD –0.4 –0.9 –1.5 –2.1 –2.6<br />

Developing countries –0.4 –1.1 –2.0 –3.1 –4.3<br />

Transition economies –0.1 –0.2 –0.2 –0.3 –0.4<br />

World -0.9 –2.2 –3.8 –5.5 –7.3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!