Evaluation of Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) in ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Evaluation of Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) in Europe – Final Report problems and concerns on a regional basis. Special attention is given on existing or planned common policies that hold the potential for orchestrated actions on the regional sea level. Table 10: Scope and Implementation of ICZM Elements in the North Sea ICZM Elements Belgium Denmark * Germany Netherlands UK Sweden Strategic Approach Participation Holistic Approach / Integration Governance Regional Policy Level of Observance • Yes, fully Partly fulfilled Significant gaps Not fulfilled Insufficient information The ICZM element is fully covered and in place (or close to). Essential aspects of this ICZM element are covered and in place; Serious initiatives for implementation are taken or foreseen. Convincing activities are planned. Only some aspects of this ICZM element are in place or implementation is planned. The ICZM element is not or only marginally covered. Insufficient information available for assessment The scoring method is explained in chapter 3 of this Report. * Scoring for Denmark extracted from auxiliary data sources Strategic approach A key challenge for the future will be achieving an integrated system that will function across the different jurisdictions that cover the coasts and estuaries of the North Sea region. In all of the countries, some degree of strategic approach in coastal planning exists. Sustainable development in recognition of the interplay of natural and socioeconomic processes features strong in most of the decisions/activities and approaches. In Germany, strategic key principles and mechanism, which shall be addressed in the future, revolve around good integration, good participation and communication, and knowledge transfer. These four mechanisms are quoted to hold the potential to solve most of the conflicting issues of space, water and labour. These shall be improved on national as well as on state and regional/local level. In the Netherlands, a strategic approach chosen for coastal flood protection is to give priority to sediment-based measures rather than artificial structures ‘soft wherever possible, hard only where necessary’. This supports ‘dynamic preservation’ by allowing natural processes to be Challenge of streamlining integrated systems that function across different jurisdictions Strategic approach for coastal flood protection in the Netherlands 18 August 2006 116
Evaluation of Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) in Europe – Final Report employed as best as possible under consideration of social, ecological and economic goals. In Denmark, according to the available auxiliary data, an assessment of the scope of existing management regulations pertaining to the coast was initiated and documented. The importance of careful planning and administration is recognised as well as the promotion of better common understanding between regional and local authorities. In the UK, the most prominent issue which has not yet been satisfactorily addressed in a strategic approach revolves around the promotion of long-term planning for ICZM. So far, most if not all ICZM initiatives have been short-term projects rather than being an integral part of an established decision-making and delivery process. Improvement is also intended to deliver a more holistic management on the ground and to enhance appreciation of coastal issues through a greater consultation with stakeholders at all levels. In Belgium there appears a resistance to identifying a strategy specifically under a label of ICZM but instead a preference to utilise existing strategic development mechanisms with a greater degree of integration of sectors and stakeholders coupled with a greater consultative process. Sweden is strongly focused on environment and to some extent social aspects, whereas economic aspects are not well covered and improvable. Sweden strongly focussed on environmental issues Participatory Methods In most countries bordering the North Sea, participation in the ICZM national strategy process was mentioned but not well-documented or elaborated in the respective reports. This information gap was covered by the auxiliary data and interviews. For instance, Germany has stimulated a wide public debate via several open conferences and workshops with selected groups, in which governmental, NGOs and private sector representatives were invited. A broad range of institutions, federal and State ministries, administration, research institutions and NGOs were represented. Furthermore, experts were invited to the conference to provide international input. All minutes of meetings of the various groups were displayed in the internet and the National Strategy was presented to the public in a conference held in April 2006. On the regional North Sea level, participation has surfaced prominently in the Wadden Sea Forum and the Euregio "The Wadden". This is also well reflected in the questionnaire results, in which Germany has gained mostly positive replies, compared to the UK or Belgium, where the replies have been more diverse. However, the general trend implies that most of the North Sea states have undertaken some efforts in stakeholder participation. 18 August 2006 117
Page 1 and 2:
International Ocean Institute Evalu
Page 3 and 4:
Evaluation of Integrated Coastal Zo
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66: Evaluation of Integrated Coastal Zo
Page 71 and 72: # Evaluation of Integrated Coastal
Page 115: Evaluation of Integrated Coastal Zo
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
Annex A: Final Overview of National
Page 259 and 260:
COUNTRY CYPRUS NATIONAL CONTACT Joh
Page 261 and 262:
COUNTRY FINLAND NATIONAL CONTACT Ti
Page 263 and 264:
COUNTRY GERMANY NATIONAL CONTACT St
Page 265 and 266:
COUNTRY IRELAND NATIONAL CONTACT Da
Page 267 and 268:
COUNTRY LATVIA NATIONAL CONTACT Dzi
Page 269 and 270:
COUNTRY MALTA NATIONAL CONTACT Mich
Page 271 and 272:
COUNTRY NATIONAL CONTACT AFFILIATIO
Page 273 and 274:
COUNTRY ROMANIA NATIONAL CONTACT Du
Page 275 and 276:
COUNTRY SPAIN NATIONAL CONTACT Carl
Page 277 and 278:
COUNTRY NATIONAL CONTACT AFFILIATIO
Page 279 and 280:
Page 281 and 282:
Analysis of National ICZM Strategie
Page 283 and 284:
3.1.2 Coverage of administrative le
Page 285 and 286:
4.1.2 Analysing the degree of using
Page 287 and 288:
ef principle 8: What kind of instru
Page 289 and 290:
• European Maritime Policy Papers
Page 291 and 292:
Page 293 and 294:
Question Block 1: Interview Co-ordi
Page 295 and 296:
2d) How are interests, roles and co
Page 297 and 298:
Question Block 3: Implementation of
Page 299 and 300:
Question Block 4: Summary 4a How is
Page 301 and 302:
Make your voice heard! You have bee
Page 303 and 304:
ICZM Evaluation --- Make Your Voice
Page 305 and 306:
Page 307 and 308:
Clark, J., (1998). Coastal Zone Pla
Page 309 and 310:
European Commission. (2000) Communi
Page 311 and 312:
Participation. Technical Report EUR
Page 313 and 314:
Pickaver, A. (2003): Integrated Coa
Page 315 and 316:
Country-Specific The country-case a
Page 317 and 318:
Belberov, Z., H. Nikolov and E. Tri
Page 319 and 320:
Cyprus: State of Play in Implementi
Page 321 and 322:
Suomen Raportointi EU:N Komissiolle
Page 323 and 324:
Ministère de l'Écologie et du Dé
Page 325 and 326:
Verkehr, Bau - und Wohnungswesen),
Page 327 and 328:
Cummins, V., C. O’Mahony and N. C
Page 329 and 330:
HELCOM recommendation 15/1, on Prot
Page 331 and 332:
Povilanskas, R., and Urbis, A. (200
Page 333 and 334:
Planning Authority, 2001. The North
Page 335 and 336:
Spatial Scale in Coastal Zone Manag
Page 337 and 338:
„Jak zaangażować społeczeństw
Page 339 and 340:
Romania National Reporting to EU IC
Page 341 and 342:
Lambrechts A., Tourism Development
Page 343 and 344:
Elburg-Velinova, v. D., Perez Valve
Page 345 and 346:
Larsson U., Hajdu S., Walve J. and
Page 347 and 348:
Stocktake and Supporting Documents
Page 349 and 350:
List of Individuals Consulted for I
Page 351 and 352:
Page 353 and 354:
Page 355 and 356:
Page 357 and 358:
List of Abbreviations and Acronyms
Page 359 and 360:
List of Abbreviations and Acronyms
show all

Evaluation of Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) in ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?