Evaluation of Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) in ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Evaluation of Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) in Europe – Final Report Table 14: Scope and Implementation of ICZM in the Atlantic ICZM Elements France Ireland Portugal Spain United Kingdom strategic approach participation holistic approach/integration governance regional policy Level of Observance • Yes, fully Partly fulfilled Significant gaps Not fulfilled Insufficient information The ICZM element is fully covered and in place (or close to). Essential aspects of this ICZM element are covered and in place; Serious initiatives for implementation are taken or foreseen. Convincing activities are planned. Only some aspects of this ICZM element are in place or implementation is planned. The ICZM element is not or only marginally covered. Insufficient information available for assessment The scoring method is explained in chapter 3 of this Report. Strategic Approach In all five countries there was a spatial planning in place that served as the basis for further development of coastal planning. While France is going to adapt its spatial planning towards an ICZM, Ireland has incorporated ICZM as strategic goals in its spatial planning already in place and valid until 2020. UK will incorporate ICZM to a large extent into the Marine Bill to be developed still and not foreseeable when this Marine Bill will come. The only countries from this regional sea that have used a strategic approach to formulate a new ICZM policy are Portugal and Spain, Portugal is still in the phase of preparation of a strategy and being behind Spain that is already going to implement first actions in 2006. On a the regional sea's level a strategic approach is limited to bilateral developments, where Spain plays a slightly advanced role. Participatory Methods The use of participatory methods in the development of the national strategy is low in general, and even less on the regional sea's level. In UK the new Marine Bill will be discussed widely and a participatory approach could be happening, in the other countries the national strategies have been developed in a traditional way, i.e. a centralistic top down process without consultation of all stakeholders. There are no organisational instruments among the different corporations, there is no participation through shared responsibilities and the different 18 August 2006 140
Evaluation of Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) in Europe – Final Report stakeholders are practically not participating in the planning and management process. In Ireland for example, existing project-level activities do seek to involve a wide range of stakeholders within the project area but the extent to which this will extend outside of project areas is uncertain. Many of these projects include a strong element of training, education and awareness. However, other aspects of participation are not present and the financial underpinning of ICZM would appear to be absent within Ireland as most projects are externally funded. In France, the identification of three levels of governorship to implement any future strategy identifying that actual management occurs at a local level coupled with devolution of planning to these local levels suggest that in future planning may have an increased bottom-up component. For Spain and Portugal, no attempts have been made yet to promote participation of all stakeholders. Holistic and Integrative Approach This is the only category where all five countries reached maximum scoring. All countries, whether developing a national strategy for ICZM or improving and developing their spatial planning instruments, strive for a holistic and integrative approach. Countries have realised the need to develop national, regional and local measures to integrate land and marine use and include the hinterland. Sustainable development is a central goal, where economic, ecological and social issues have to be taken into account. However it has to be mentioned that this development has to be up-graded to the regional sea's level. Holistic and integrative approach followed by all Atlantic countries Governance and Management Structures France' emphasis that implementation of management will be actioned and coordinated at the local level implies that there will be strong community involvement such that policy and legislation will address national to local interests. In Ireland it is reasonable to assume that in common with other countries in the EU, Ireland would seek to inculcate the principles of ICZM within existing policy and legislative frameworks rather than develop ICZM specific legislation. At some local levels, fora have been developed that have led to a good relationship between particular local authorities and the University sector. UK seems to have the most developed governance and management structure. To achieve integration between the different existing sector-based management bodies mechanisms to improve communication and co-ordination were installed that led to the establishment of several coastal groupings (commonly known as fora), at national, regional and local levels. These fora were established in England, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales. 18 August 2006 141
Page 1 and 2:
International Ocean Institute Evalu
Page 3 and 4:
Evaluation of Integrated Coastal Zo
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
# Evaluation of Integrated Coastal
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90: Evaluation of Integrated Coastal Zo
Page 139: Evaluation of Integrated Coastal Zo
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
Annex A: Final Overview of National
Page 259 and 260:
COUNTRY CYPRUS NATIONAL CONTACT Joh
Page 261 and 262:
COUNTRY FINLAND NATIONAL CONTACT Ti
Page 263 and 264:
COUNTRY GERMANY NATIONAL CONTACT St
Page 265 and 266:
COUNTRY IRELAND NATIONAL CONTACT Da
Page 267 and 268:
COUNTRY LATVIA NATIONAL CONTACT Dzi
Page 269 and 270:
COUNTRY MALTA NATIONAL CONTACT Mich
Page 271 and 272:
COUNTRY NATIONAL CONTACT AFFILIATIO
Page 273 and 274:
COUNTRY ROMANIA NATIONAL CONTACT Du
Page 275 and 276:
COUNTRY SPAIN NATIONAL CONTACT Carl
Page 277 and 278:
COUNTRY NATIONAL CONTACT AFFILIATIO
Page 279 and 280:
Page 281 and 282:
Analysis of National ICZM Strategie
Page 283 and 284:
3.1.2 Coverage of administrative le
Page 285 and 286:
4.1.2 Analysing the degree of using
Page 287 and 288:
ef principle 8: What kind of instru
Page 289 and 290:
• European Maritime Policy Papers
Page 291 and 292:
Page 293 and 294:
Question Block 1: Interview Co-ordi
Page 295 and 296:
2d) How are interests, roles and co
Page 297 and 298:
Question Block 3: Implementation of
Page 299 and 300:
Question Block 4: Summary 4a How is
Page 301 and 302:
Make your voice heard! You have bee
Page 303 and 304:
ICZM Evaluation --- Make Your Voice
Page 305 and 306:
Page 307 and 308:
Clark, J., (1998). Coastal Zone Pla
Page 309 and 310:
European Commission. (2000) Communi
Page 311 and 312:
Participation. Technical Report EUR
Page 313 and 314:
Pickaver, A. (2003): Integrated Coa
Page 315 and 316:
Country-Specific The country-case a
Page 317 and 318:
Belberov, Z., H. Nikolov and E. Tri
Page 319 and 320:
Cyprus: State of Play in Implementi
Page 321 and 322:
Suomen Raportointi EU:N Komissiolle
Page 323 and 324:
Ministère de l'Écologie et du Dé
Page 325 and 326:
Verkehr, Bau - und Wohnungswesen),
Page 327 and 328:
Cummins, V., C. O’Mahony and N. C
Page 329 and 330:
HELCOM recommendation 15/1, on Prot
Page 331 and 332:
Povilanskas, R., and Urbis, A. (200
Page 333 and 334:
Planning Authority, 2001. The North
Page 335 and 336:
Spatial Scale in Coastal Zone Manag
Page 337 and 338:
„Jak zaangażować społeczeństw
Page 339 and 340:
Romania National Reporting to EU IC
Page 341 and 342:
Lambrechts A., Tourism Development
Page 343 and 344:
Elburg-Velinova, v. D., Perez Valve
Page 345 and 346:
Larsson U., Hajdu S., Walve J. and
Page 347 and 348:
Stocktake and Supporting Documents
Page 349 and 350:
List of Individuals Consulted for I
Page 351 and 352:
Page 353 and 354:
Page 355 and 356:
Page 357 and 358:
List of Abbreviations and Acronyms
Page 359 and 360:
List of Abbreviations and Acronyms
show all

Evaluation of Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) in ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?