Evaluation of Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) in ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Evaluation of Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) in Europe – Final Report resolution mechanisms between competing stakeholders are improving. • Identification of priority coastal areas requiring immediate conservation and rehabilitation actions is being done in support of dedicated action-oriented projects. Reasons for Differences in the Progress to Introduce and Implement ICZM in Europe There are several important factors which individually, in conjunction or in conflict with each other either support or hamper progress of ICZM in Europe. The main success factors for progress in ICZM are: • Small size and high importance of coast in relation to total size of country • A proper allocation of competences, functions and tasks between central and lower state levels • Leadership or at least a dedicated caretaker role (“political will”) by the national level driving and/or coordinating ICZM • Connecting on-going administrative and governance changes within Member States with necessities of ICZM • Utilizing and strengthening existing territorial planning and management institutions (e.g. from spatial planning) for ICZM • National, regional and local levels working in connection with regional seas initiatives • ICZM projects, programmes and initiatives showing benefits to and increasing communication among stakeholders • Reliable funding for ICZM initiatives with a medium- to longterm time frame • Qualified personnel and management on all levels conversant with ICZM • Strong civil society organizations promoting environmental affairs. The main fail factors for progress in ICZM are: • Unclear distribution of functions between national and lower levels of government with national government not feeling “incharge” of ICZM • ICZM introduction coming at the wrong time (when the respective country is undergoing major reforms that organize the larger structure) • Countries (purportedly) claiming that ICZM is sufficiently being taken care of by spatial planning institutions 18 August 2006 18
Evaluation of Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) in Europe – Final Report • Insufficient time, unqualified manpower and insufficient funds provided to introduce the complex idea of ICZM through awareness, education and demonstration projects. Added-value of ICZM in the Context of Policies and Legislation (Chapter 5) The analysis of the added-value of ICZM vis á vis existing and evolving EU policies and legislation has shown that ICZM relates positively to many EU policies 6 and legal frameworks 7 : • ICZM is capable to help translate often very abstract policies to local and regional situations (e.g. Governance White Paper) • ICZM can help to harmonise short-term aims with long-term policy objectives. ICZM connects existing policies & regulations • ICZM can help to improve the coordination among policies, sectors and across scales. • ICZM promotes participatory methods, thus greatly improving transparency in decision-making and co-management of coastal areas. • A very important specific area of ICZM will be its intermediary function between the terrestrial/coastal management as stipulated in the Water Framework Directive and the planned Marine Strategy Directive as part of the Maritime Policy. ICZM connects land & water Recommendations (Chapter 6) A discussion is ongoing among many ICZM stakeholders in Europe, whether an “ICZM Directive” should be proposed. Even if there is a strong demand for a regulatory approach in some countries (and possibly this may have to be followed in the long-term), this evaluation concludes that the potentials of the current EU ICZM Recommendation are not yet fully exploited, and that an incentive-based approach will be more effective on the European level. Incentives instead of regulation It is clear however that the EU ICZM Recommendation has initiated a non-reversible process that can lead to an integrated coastal management in most of the Member States, provided that EU support will be continued, strengthened and focussed. Thus, for the success of a European-wide implementation of ICZM, the EU will play a central and important role, especially to provide guidance and standards in following the general goals of a sustainable development along the coast respecting a balance between ecological, economical and social interests. 6 The following policy frameworks were analysed: Lisbon Strategy; Governance White Paper; The EU Cohesion Policy; The Emerging Maritime Policy, Sustainable Development Strategy; The EU Sustainable Tourism Policy; European Spatial Development Perspective; Sixth EU Environmental Action Programme; Thematic Strategy on Urban Environment (TSUE). 7 The following legal frameworks were analysed: The Planned Marine Strategy Directive; The Water Framework Directive (WFD) and Directly Related Directives (Urban Waste Water Treatment, Nitrate Directive, Drinking Water Directive, Directive for Integrated Pollution and Prevention Control (IPPC); Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Directive; Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Directive; The Birds Directive; The Habitat Directive; Industrial Installations and the Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control Directive (IPPC), Global Monitoring for Environment and Security (GMES) and the Planned Directive for Spatial Information in the Community (INSPIRE). 18 August 2006 19
Page 1 and 2: International Ocean Institute Evalu
Page 3 and 4: Evaluation of Integrated Coastal Zo
Page 17: Evaluation of Integrated Coastal Zo
Page 69 and 70:
Evaluation of Integrated Coastal Zo
Page 71 and 72:
# Evaluation of Integrated Coastal
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
Annex A: Final Overview of National
Page 259 and 260:
COUNTRY CYPRUS NATIONAL CONTACT Joh
Page 261 and 262:
COUNTRY FINLAND NATIONAL CONTACT Ti
Page 263 and 264:
COUNTRY GERMANY NATIONAL CONTACT St
Page 265 and 266:
COUNTRY IRELAND NATIONAL CONTACT Da
Page 267 and 268:
COUNTRY LATVIA NATIONAL CONTACT Dzi
Page 269 and 270:
COUNTRY MALTA NATIONAL CONTACT Mich
Page 271 and 272:
COUNTRY NATIONAL CONTACT AFFILIATIO
Page 273 and 274:
COUNTRY ROMANIA NATIONAL CONTACT Du
Page 275 and 276:
COUNTRY SPAIN NATIONAL CONTACT Carl
Page 277 and 278:
COUNTRY NATIONAL CONTACT AFFILIATIO
Page 279 and 280:
Page 281 and 282:
Analysis of National ICZM Strategie
Page 283 and 284:
3.1.2 Coverage of administrative le
Page 285 and 286:
4.1.2 Analysing the degree of using
Page 287 and 288:
ef principle 8: What kind of instru
Page 289 and 290:
• European Maritime Policy Papers
Page 291 and 292:
Page 293 and 294:
Question Block 1: Interview Co-ordi
Page 295 and 296:
2d) How are interests, roles and co
Page 297 and 298:
Question Block 3: Implementation of
Page 299 and 300:
Question Block 4: Summary 4a How is
Page 301 and 302:
Make your voice heard! You have bee
Page 303 and 304:
ICZM Evaluation --- Make Your Voice
Page 305 and 306:
Page 307 and 308:
Clark, J., (1998). Coastal Zone Pla
Page 309 and 310:
European Commission. (2000) Communi
Page 311 and 312:
Participation. Technical Report EUR
Page 313 and 314:
Pickaver, A. (2003): Integrated Coa
Page 315 and 316:
Country-Specific The country-case a
Page 317 and 318:
Belberov, Z., H. Nikolov and E. Tri
Page 319 and 320:
Cyprus: State of Play in Implementi
Page 321 and 322:
Suomen Raportointi EU:N Komissiolle
Page 323 and 324:
Ministère de l'Écologie et du Dé
Page 325 and 326:
Verkehr, Bau - und Wohnungswesen),
Page 327 and 328:
Cummins, V., C. O’Mahony and N. C
Page 329 and 330:
HELCOM recommendation 15/1, on Prot
Page 331 and 332:
Povilanskas, R., and Urbis, A. (200
Page 333 and 334:
Planning Authority, 2001. The North
Page 335 and 336:
Spatial Scale in Coastal Zone Manag
Page 337 and 338:
„Jak zaangażować społeczeństw
Page 339 and 340:
Romania National Reporting to EU IC
Page 341 and 342:
Lambrechts A., Tourism Development
Page 343 and 344:
Elburg-Velinova, v. D., Perez Valve
Page 345 and 346:
Larsson U., Hajdu S., Walve J. and
Page 347 and 348:
Stocktake and Supporting Documents
Page 349 and 350:
List of Individuals Consulted for I
Page 351 and 352:
Page 353 and 354:
Page 355 and 356:
Page 357 and 358:
List of Abbreviations and Acronyms
Page 359 and 360:
List of Abbreviations and Acronyms
show all

Evaluation of Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) in ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?