Evaluation of Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) in ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Evaluation of Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) in Europe – Final Report tween different interests, e.g. nature conservation, economic growth and social welfare, in a regional seas perspective. • ICZM element “Regional Policy” looks on the existing instruments and mechanisms that foster a joint collaboration on problems and concerns on a regional basis. Special attention is given on existing or planned common policies that hold the potential for orchestrated actions on the regional sea level. Table 18: Scope and Implementation of ICZM in the Mediterranean Sea ICZM Elements Croatia Cyprus France Greece Italy Malta Slovenia Spain Turkey Strategic approach Participation Holistic approach- /integration Governance Regional policy Level of Observance • Yes, fully Partly fulfilled Significant gaps Not fulfilled Insufficient information The ICZM element is fully covered and in place (or close to). Essential aspects of this ICZM element are covered and in place; Serious initiatives for implementation are taken or foreseen. Convincing activities are planned. Only some aspects of this ICZM element are in place or implementation is planned. The ICZM element is not or only marginally covered. Insufficient information available for assessment The scoring method is explained in chapter 3 of this Report. Strategic Approach A strategic national approach to ICZM is only recognizable for those countries that have been assessed as having a national ICZM strategy or an equivalent (Cyprus, France, Greece, Malta, Slovenia and Spain). In these cases long-term sustainability concerns were incorporated into the countries’ respective national strategies and broad measures to arrive at these designed. The Spanish and Maltese strategies mention the three dimensions of sustainability, i.e. ecological, economic and social. In Cyprus and Slovenia these concepts are brought in through Coastal Area Management Projects (CAMP). Long-term sustainability concerns incorporated in national reports/ strategies Participatory Methods An adequate participation or involvement of stakeholders appears to be an overriding problem for most of the Mediterranean countries. Noteworthy exceptions are Malta, Slovenia and Cyprus. In the latter 18 August 2006 166
Evaluation of Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) in Europe – Final Report two cases methods to support the participation of stakeholders were brought in through Coastal Area Management Projects (CAMP). The Spanish national ICZM strategy foresees an adequate involvement of stakeholders, however, its own elaboration was done without significant and sufficient stakeholder participation. In all other countries stakeholder participation is in its infancy or only practiced in few rather exceptional cases. Holistic and Integrative Approach Holistic ICZM approaches imbedded in wider country strategies integrating views and initiating efforts across sectors emerge for some countries only: Cyprus, Greece, Malta, Slovenia, Spain and to some extent Croatia. In some instances (e.g. Croatia and Malta) there has been a good opportunity to develop a holistic and integrative approach starting from spatial planning and management where “traditionally” a cross-sectoral approach had been in use. Governance and Management Structures Adequate governance and management structures are in all countries deficient. In most countries laws and regulations need to be “overhauled” systematically. In those few cases where a number of new laws and regulations with reference to coastal areas were recently promulgated (e.g. Slovenia) often there is a problem of lack of experience on how to implement them. In some instances (e.g. Greece, Cyprus and Malta) law enforcement is mentioned as a significant problem. Integration of different levels (national, regional, local) MEDITERRANEAN SEA total 10 16 6 Cyprus 2 4 France Spain Malta Croatia 2 4 4 1 2 1 1 1 2 Yes No Uncertain Greece Italy Slovenia 1 2 2 2 1 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Number of questionnaires Figure 23: Response to the ICZM Evaluation Questionnaire (Mediterranean Sea): Do you feel your country’s approach for coastal management in general sufficiently covers the following principles: Integration of different levels) Overlapping and/or unclear responsibilities, in the absence of clear obligation for policy-coordination between all concerned parties, makes effective management more difficult to achieve and efforts to integration and coordination are often left to the good will of involved agencies and stakeholders (e.g. Malta). Good examples of creating new coordinative mechanisms involving various stakeholders 18 August 2006 167
Page 1 and 2:
International Ocean Institute Evalu
Page 3 and 4:
Evaluation of Integrated Coastal Zo
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
# Evaluation of Integrated Coastal
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116: Evaluation of Integrated Coastal Zo
Page 165: Evaluation of Integrated Coastal Zo
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
Annex A: Final Overview of National
Page 259 and 260:
COUNTRY CYPRUS NATIONAL CONTACT Joh
Page 261 and 262:
COUNTRY FINLAND NATIONAL CONTACT Ti
Page 263 and 264:
COUNTRY GERMANY NATIONAL CONTACT St
Page 265 and 266:
COUNTRY IRELAND NATIONAL CONTACT Da
Page 267 and 268:
COUNTRY LATVIA NATIONAL CONTACT Dzi
Page 269 and 270:
COUNTRY MALTA NATIONAL CONTACT Mich
Page 271 and 272:
COUNTRY NATIONAL CONTACT AFFILIATIO
Page 273 and 274:
COUNTRY ROMANIA NATIONAL CONTACT Du
Page 275 and 276:
COUNTRY SPAIN NATIONAL CONTACT Carl
Page 277 and 278:
COUNTRY NATIONAL CONTACT AFFILIATIO
Page 279 and 280:
Page 281 and 282:
Analysis of National ICZM Strategie
Page 283 and 284:
3.1.2 Coverage of administrative le
Page 285 and 286:
4.1.2 Analysing the degree of using
Page 287 and 288:
ef principle 8: What kind of instru
Page 289 and 290:
• European Maritime Policy Papers
Page 291 and 292:
Page 293 and 294:
Question Block 1: Interview Co-ordi
Page 295 and 296:
2d) How are interests, roles and co
Page 297 and 298:
Question Block 3: Implementation of
Page 299 and 300:
Question Block 4: Summary 4a How is
Page 301 and 302:
Make your voice heard! You have bee
Page 303 and 304:
ICZM Evaluation --- Make Your Voice
Page 305 and 306:
Page 307 and 308:
Clark, J., (1998). Coastal Zone Pla
Page 309 and 310:
European Commission. (2000) Communi
Page 311 and 312:
Participation. Technical Report EUR
Page 313 and 314:
Pickaver, A. (2003): Integrated Coa
Page 315 and 316:
Country-Specific The country-case a
Page 317 and 318:
Belberov, Z., H. Nikolov and E. Tri
Page 319 and 320:
Cyprus: State of Play in Implementi
Page 321 and 322:
Suomen Raportointi EU:N Komissiolle
Page 323 and 324:
Ministère de l'Écologie et du Dé
Page 325 and 326:
Verkehr, Bau - und Wohnungswesen),
Page 327 and 328:
Cummins, V., C. O’Mahony and N. C
Page 329 and 330:
HELCOM recommendation 15/1, on Prot
Page 331 and 332:
Povilanskas, R., and Urbis, A. (200
Page 333 and 334:
Planning Authority, 2001. The North
Page 335 and 336:
Spatial Scale in Coastal Zone Manag
Page 337 and 338:
„Jak zaangażować społeczeństw
Page 339 and 340:
Romania National Reporting to EU IC
Page 341 and 342:
Lambrechts A., Tourism Development
Page 343 and 344:
Elburg-Velinova, v. D., Perez Valve
Page 345 and 346:
Larsson U., Hajdu S., Walve J. and
Page 347 and 348:
Stocktake and Supporting Documents
Page 349 and 350:
List of Individuals Consulted for I
Page 351 and 352:
Page 353 and 354:
Page 355 and 356:
Page 357 and 358:
List of Abbreviations and Acronyms
Page 359 and 360:
List of Abbreviations and Acronyms
show all

Evaluation of Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) in ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?