Evaluation of Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) in ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Evaluation of Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) in Europe – Final Report and regulations in ICZM for stakeholders in order to enable their participation in this new approach. Looking beyond the own domain, assessing interactions between sectoral policies and ensuring multiple compliances should become central elements in practice. At the same time, ICZM needs to become incorporated gradually into the full range of funding instruments affecting coastal development. It should represent a key reference and a common criterion for granting funds: Only projects ensuring compliance with its principles and approach should be supported. Here, the Commission and Member States can provide valuable support through clear guidelines and tools for implementation, based on results from monitoring and evaluation. An independent European body (ICZM Advisory Board) should substantiate the orientations provided by assessing policies and monitoring the implementation progress. The relevance and contribution of national ICZM approaches will however strongly depend on how the Commission itself will translate ICZM in its Marine Policy, the Marine Strategy and other relevant directives and policies. Funds to be conditioned by ICZM compliance Guidance required at EU and national levels This general strategy aims to ensure that understanding and acceptance of ICZM become more and more generalised in the pertinent fields, thus improving feasibility and effectiveness. Moreover, implementation is deemed to involve only marginal additional costs since it would largely draw on the same resources (human, budgets) currently available, focusing on the key deficits (knowledge, communication). Actions 5 Promote awareness, guidance, training and education 6.1 Complete the stocktake exercise in due time 6.2 Set up an ICZM advisory board at European level 6.3 Create ICZM stakeholder fora at national, Regional Seas and European levels 7 Perform a mainstreaming of European policies 8 Harmonise monitoring and evaluation frameworks 9.2 Evaluate ICZM project results and experiences 5 6.1 6.2 6.3 7 8 9.2 18 August 2006 226
Evaluation of Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) in Europe – Final Report Elaborate the strategic approach of ICZM - oriented at a balanced ecologic, social, economic and cultural development. Develop a common conceptual framework describing the geographical delimitations, development orientations, stakeholder responsibilities, and procedures to be followed, linking the EC recommendation and stakeholder routines in a practical way. 3 A key difficulty that ICZM has to deal with in practice consists in the lack of experiences regarding an integrated assessment of commonly separated sectoral policies and their impacts coalescing over the same spatial area – an area which in addition extends across various authority perimeters. The focus of stakeholders at present on environmental aspects can thus also be regarded a practical strategy of complexity reduction to ensure viability. However, the underlying deficits need to be addressed urgently if progress is to be made. Both, the methodological problem of cross-sector policy assessment, comparing impacts measured in entirely different units (e.g. job growth and biodiversity), and the enormous challenge of establishing new forms of cooperation and coordination between stakeholders have to be tackled systematically. To avoid a wasteful trial-and-error approach, but rather achieve a broad take-up of good practices, action is required at the European level. A two-way process needs to be organised, bringing together high-level strategic orientations and local administrative practices. On the one hand, the principles formulated in the EC Recommendation should become further specified to improve their immediate practical relevance (topdown). On the other hand, options for adequate implementation on the ground need to be detailed in the light of diverse local realities (bottom-up). The aim should be to develop and continuously improve a common conceptual framework together with the stakeholders – an “ICZM handbook” that should be updated regularly. Work on the strategic approach of future ICZM needs to focus on three key issues. First, the geographical coverage should become clearly oriented at ecological systems rather than administrative boundaries. It implies to establish guidelines for delimiting suitable areas, considering an extension of the Water Framework Directive approach beyond the one mile zone (managing the territory from a river basin drainage system perspective). The pertinence of national strategies as promoted by the EC Recommendation has to be checked in this light. Rationale Difficult adoption of ICZM process and methods Strategic orientation versus local practice Eco-system approach needed 18 August 2006 227
Page 1 and 2:
International Ocean Institute Evalu
Page 3 and 4:
Evaluation of Integrated Coastal Zo
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
# Evaluation of Integrated Coastal
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176: Evaluation of Integrated Coastal Zo
Page 225: Evaluation of Integrated Coastal Zo
Page 257 and 258: Annex A: Final Overview of National
Page 259 and 260: COUNTRY CYPRUS NATIONAL CONTACT Joh
Page 261 and 262: COUNTRY FINLAND NATIONAL CONTACT Ti
Page 263 and 264: COUNTRY GERMANY NATIONAL CONTACT St
Page 265 and 266: COUNTRY IRELAND NATIONAL CONTACT Da
Page 267 and 268: COUNTRY LATVIA NATIONAL CONTACT Dzi
Page 269 and 270: COUNTRY MALTA NATIONAL CONTACT Mich
Page 271 and 272: COUNTRY NATIONAL CONTACT AFFILIATIO
Page 273 and 274: COUNTRY ROMANIA NATIONAL CONTACT Du
Page 275 and 276: COUNTRY SPAIN NATIONAL CONTACT Carl
Page 277 and 278:
COUNTRY NATIONAL CONTACT AFFILIATIO
Page 279 and 280:
Page 281 and 282:
Analysis of National ICZM Strategie
Page 283 and 284:
3.1.2 Coverage of administrative le
Page 285 and 286:
4.1.2 Analysing the degree of using
Page 287 and 288:
ef principle 8: What kind of instru
Page 289 and 290:
• European Maritime Policy Papers
Page 291 and 292:
Page 293 and 294:
Question Block 1: Interview Co-ordi
Page 295 and 296:
2d) How are interests, roles and co
Page 297 and 298:
Question Block 3: Implementation of
Page 299 and 300:
Question Block 4: Summary 4a How is
Page 301 and 302:
Make your voice heard! You have bee
Page 303 and 304:
ICZM Evaluation --- Make Your Voice
Page 305 and 306:
Page 307 and 308:
Clark, J., (1998). Coastal Zone Pla
Page 309 and 310:
European Commission. (2000) Communi
Page 311 and 312:
Participation. Technical Report EUR
Page 313 and 314:
Pickaver, A. (2003): Integrated Coa
Page 315 and 316:
Country-Specific The country-case a
Page 317 and 318:
Belberov, Z., H. Nikolov and E. Tri
Page 319 and 320:
Cyprus: State of Play in Implementi
Page 321 and 322:
Suomen Raportointi EU:N Komissiolle
Page 323 and 324:
Ministère de l'Écologie et du Dé
Page 325 and 326:
Verkehr, Bau - und Wohnungswesen),
Page 327 and 328:
Cummins, V., C. O’Mahony and N. C
Page 329 and 330:
HELCOM recommendation 15/1, on Prot
Page 331 and 332:
Povilanskas, R., and Urbis, A. (200
Page 333 and 334:
Planning Authority, 2001. The North
Page 335 and 336:
Spatial Scale in Coastal Zone Manag
Page 337 and 338:
„Jak zaangażować społeczeństw
Page 339 and 340:
Romania National Reporting to EU IC
Page 341 and 342:
Lambrechts A., Tourism Development
Page 343 and 344:
Elburg-Velinova, v. D., Perez Valve
Page 345 and 346:
Larsson U., Hajdu S., Walve J. and
Page 347 and 348:
Stocktake and Supporting Documents
Page 349 and 350:
List of Individuals Consulted for I
Page 351 and 352:
Page 353 and 354:
Page 355 and 356:
Page 357 and 358:
List of Abbreviations and Acronyms
Page 359 and 360:
List of Abbreviations and Acronyms
show all

Evaluation of Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) in ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?