29.08.2014 Views

Railway Reform: Toolkit for Improving Rail Sector Performance - ppiaf

Railway Reform: Toolkit for Improving Rail Sector Performance - ppiaf

Railway Reform: Toolkit for Improving Rail Sector Performance - ppiaf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong><strong>Rail</strong>way</strong> <strong>Re<strong>for</strong>m</strong>: <strong>Toolkit</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Improving</strong> <strong>Rail</strong> <strong>Sector</strong> Per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

7. Administering the <strong><strong>Rail</strong>way</strong>s<br />

7 Administering the <strong><strong>Rail</strong>way</strong>s<br />

7.1 Introduction<br />

In many countries, railway transport activities have been organized as part of the<br />

state administration. Public transport services <strong>for</strong> passengers and state-owned<br />

industries’ transport needs are politically sensitive. This led to establishing state<br />

railway departments and historically, many governments have been deeply involved<br />

in managing the daily activities of railway entities.<br />

Transport markets<br />

have changed dramatically.<br />

The relationship<br />

between the<br />

state and the railway<br />

must be adapted to reflect<br />

a new reality. The<br />

best way to do this is<br />

by allowing the railway<br />

to function as a<br />

commercial entity.<br />

However, in recent decades, transports markets have trans<strong>for</strong>med by road transport<br />

deregulation, urbanization, containerization, and the evolution of new global<br />

trading patterns. These have <strong>for</strong>ever changed rail transport entities’ role and<br />

competitive positions, there<strong>for</strong>e, the relationship between state and railway must<br />

be adapted to reflect this new reality. Today, allowing the railway to function as a<br />

commercial entity is best practice <strong>for</strong> organizing railway activities. As a result,<br />

state railway administrations are evolving into state-owned enterprises, into private<br />

enterprises operating under concession agreements, or as partial private/<br />

public corporations. This section analyzes options to segregate decision making<br />

and oversight duties between government and state-owned railway enterprises.<br />

State-owned railway per<strong>for</strong>mance depends on a complex web of agents and actors—company<br />

management, board of directors, various ownership entities, national<br />

government ministries and regulatory bodies, local government bodies,<br />

and shipper organizations, to name a few. Not surprisingly, accountability <strong>for</strong><br />

railway entities’ per<strong>for</strong>mance can be difficult to assign precisely, so developing a<br />

structure that will ensure efficient decisions and good corporate governance is<br />

challenging.<br />

7.2 New Relationships Between the State and <strong><strong>Rail</strong>way</strong>s<br />

7.2.1 Adapting to new market conditions<br />

New market conditions have created a strongly competitive transport environment<br />

that has downgraded railways’ importance. Since 1950, the efficiency of<br />

road and water transport has grown exponentially, mirrored by changes in ownership<br />

and financial structures. <strong><strong>Rail</strong>way</strong>s are now competing primarily with nimble<br />

private companies using trucks, ships, cars, buses, and aircraft— that can<br />

adapt more rapidly to market requirements. As economies develop, the structure<br />

of the economy often changes to require less transport. Over the last sixty years,<br />

governments have invested heavily to develop roads and highways, creating railways’<br />

strongest and most successful competitor. As in many developing countries<br />

road users do not pay or do not pay enough <strong>for</strong> using infrastructure, which puts<br />

railways in an even more difficult position. As a result, rail market share is declining,<br />

exerting downward pressure on volume and revenues.<br />

Tough competition and declining market share should trigger changes in railway<br />

administration and management—cutting costs, adapting services to customer<br />

shipping requirements, and improving service quality. But these responses have<br />

been rare because railways were managed as government departments, not busi-<br />

The World Bank Page 108

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!