29.08.2014 Views

Railway Reform: Toolkit for Improving Rail Sector Performance - ppiaf

Railway Reform: Toolkit for Improving Rail Sector Performance - ppiaf

Railway Reform: Toolkit for Improving Rail Sector Performance - ppiaf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong><strong>Rail</strong>way</strong> <strong>Re<strong>for</strong>m</strong>: <strong>Toolkit</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Improving</strong> <strong>Rail</strong> <strong>Sector</strong> Per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

Case Study: Australian <strong>Rail</strong> Track Corporation<br />

Since 2004, after taking over the NSW network, annual revenue has increased to<br />

around A$600 million, including access revenue of about A$380million and<br />

maintenance contract earnings of about A$180 million. During 2007-10, the cash<br />

surplus averaged over A$140 million, helped by the Hunter coal traffic.<br />

The investment picture is similar (Figure 3). Since 1998-99, ARTC has invested<br />

A$3.2 billion in its network. Government supplied about 80 percent, in roughly<br />

equal proportions of grants and equity. 138 The ARTC operations generated<br />

around A$600 million, thus covering ‘normal’ renewal investments reflected in<br />

depreciation charges during the period (around A$300 million) and generating<br />

about the same amount towards infrastructure upgrades, sufficient to address the<br />

backlog and the initial development of an advanced train control system.<br />

138 Grant funds have been taxable but also have earned interest be<strong>for</strong>e they were spent;<br />

these related revenues and costs have been treated as ‘grants’ <strong>for</strong> the purposes of this<br />

case study.<br />

The World Bank Page 314

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!