29.08.2014 Views

Railway Reform: Toolkit for Improving Rail Sector Performance - ppiaf

Railway Reform: Toolkit for Improving Rail Sector Performance - ppiaf

Railway Reform: Toolkit for Improving Rail Sector Performance - ppiaf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong><strong>Rail</strong>way</strong> <strong>Re<strong>for</strong>m</strong>: <strong>Toolkit</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Improving</strong> <strong>Rail</strong> <strong>Sector</strong> Per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

Case Study: Camrail<br />

tries, concessionaires are convenient government scapegoats when the public is<br />

unhappy with services.<br />

Second, as a result, freight traffic must earn enough to cover the full cost of infrastructure<br />

maintenance and renewal. Most functioning railways carry enough<br />

freight traffic to cover routine maintenance, but few have sufficient funds to pay<br />

<strong>for</strong> major periodic maintenance or upgrades. Infrastructure will thus steadily deteriorate<br />

unless external funds are found. Even <strong>for</strong> Cameroon’s relatively busy<br />

railway, traffic levels are too low <strong>for</strong> any operator, private or public, to generate<br />

surpluses sufficient to finance replacement infrastructure to a standard that<br />

would provide high-quality freight and passenger rail services.<br />

In addition, unlike investment in rolling stock, infrastructure investment is not<br />

portable and must be abandoned if the concession is terminated. This problem is<br />

common to many concessions and, much as governments may wish to think that<br />

infrastructure funding problems will disappear once a railway is privatized, this is<br />

only possible <strong>for</strong> railways with reasonably large traffic volumes and a concessionaire<br />

committed to the long-term.<br />

The 2008 amendment is a milestone in the development of African concessions.<br />

First, the Government established a specific program of passenger-related investment<br />

to replace the previous generalized commitment. Second, the original<br />

agreement required the concessionaire to fully cover infrastructure renewal, and<br />

the Government to provide only partial financing <strong>for</strong> initial rehabilitation<br />

(through IFI loans, which the concessionaire was responsible <strong>for</strong> repaying). This<br />

proved financially infeasible; the 2008 amendment transfers responsibility to the<br />

Government <strong>for</strong> infrastructure renewal and the concessionaire retains responsibility<br />

<strong>for</strong> maintenance. The concessionaire contributes renewal costs through fees<br />

based on concessionaire profitability. Similar arrangements will need to be established<br />

in most concessions that now require the concessionaire to be responsible<br />

<strong>for</strong> passenger services and infrastructure renewal to ensure a long-term future <strong>for</strong><br />

the rail system.<br />

The World Bank Page 336

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!