29.08.2014 Views

Railway Reform: Toolkit for Improving Rail Sector Performance - ppiaf

Railway Reform: Toolkit for Improving Rail Sector Performance - ppiaf

Railway Reform: Toolkit for Improving Rail Sector Performance - ppiaf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong><strong>Rail</strong>way</strong> <strong>Re<strong>for</strong>m</strong>: <strong>Toolkit</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Improving</strong> <strong>Rail</strong> <strong>Sector</strong> Per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

Annex 4: Concession Contract Guide<br />

on the winning bid being countersigned by the Authority to make the Agreement.<br />

Regardless of the option selected, the bid bond should be extended to cover the<br />

achievement of Conditions Precedent to the Agreement becoming effective.<br />

As indicated, a per<strong>for</strong>mance bond that lasts the life of the Term is unlikely to be<br />

cost-effective. The considerable expense that the winning bidder has incurred to<br />

reach that stage creates an incentive to proceed. However, it may be prudent to<br />

have a per<strong>for</strong>mance bond—specified by either time period, or expenditure level.<br />

Shareholder investment, <strong>for</strong> example in New Upgrades, coupled with Funder<br />

loans puts real risk money at stake, some or all of the benefits of which will accrue<br />

to the Authority, although the benefit will be less if there is a full payout to<br />

the Funders regardless of the reason <strong>for</strong> termination. A considerable amount is at<br />

stake; thus, a per<strong>for</strong>mance bond provision should not only stipulate a financial<br />

institution with a high credit rating, specifying the credit agency and rating, but<br />

also allow the bond to be returned to the issuer at a point specified by either time<br />

period, or expenditure level.<br />

The interval just be<strong>for</strong>e the Term expires is the next period when the Authority is<br />

most exposed to risk. Usually, there will be a requirement that on expiration of<br />

the Term, assets should be of a standard commensurate with rail system operation<br />

(see Hand Back post). At a suitable point in time be<strong>for</strong>e expiration, concession<br />

assets should be inspected. To the extent work is required to reach that standard,<br />

the Concessionaire should lock up dividends and other payments in an escrow<br />

account sufficient to meet the requisite expenditure; or the Concessionaire<br />

should procure a bond issued (by an issuer of the same financial strength as <strong>for</strong><br />

the issue of the per<strong>for</strong>mance bond). The escrow account or the bond should exist<br />

until the requisite work is complete and the final inspection, which would ordinarily<br />

take place after Hand Back has been satisfactorily carried out.<br />

2.13 Obligations of the Concessionaire<br />

To the extent economically and commercially sustainable, Concessionaire rights<br />

and obligations pursuant to the Agreement should be at Concessionaire cost and<br />

risk, without recourse to Authority credit or guarantees. If the Authority intends<br />

financial support, whether actual or contingent, the basis should be specified in<br />

the Agreement.<br />

Unless the Agreement includes contrary provisions (<strong>for</strong> examples, see the concept<br />

contained in section 2.20 (Preservation of Concessioned Assets) it may be appropriate<br />

<strong>for</strong> the Concessionaire to have unrestricted authority to negotiate terms<br />

and conditions of all necessary contracts with all suppliers, commercial service<br />

providers, and users in respect of the concession and its obligations under the<br />

Agreement. If Authority financial support is involved, Concessionaire procurement<br />

rules and procedures and the extent of their application should be agreed in<br />

advance between the Authority and the Concessionaire.<br />

To the extent viable under the circumstances pertaining to the scheme, the Concessionaire<br />

should agree to raise the required finance to complete the New Upgrades<br />

in accordance with Agreement terms and conditions. If loans and credits<br />

are sought to be arranged based on Authority guarantees or backstopping such<br />

loans in favor of the Funders, then more of the scheme’s risks will fall on the<br />

The World Bank Page 258

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!