29.08.2014 Views

Railway Reform: Toolkit for Improving Rail Sector Performance - ppiaf

Railway Reform: Toolkit for Improving Rail Sector Performance - ppiaf

Railway Reform: Toolkit for Improving Rail Sector Performance - ppiaf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong><strong>Rail</strong>way</strong> <strong>Re<strong>for</strong>m</strong>: <strong>Toolkit</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Improving</strong> <strong>Rail</strong> <strong>Sector</strong> Per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

Annex 4: Concession Contract Guide<br />

• Specify service levels to be delivered by the private sector and the flow of<br />

payments between the parties without extended negotiations; and<br />

• Establish a consistent approach and pricing among bidders during any competitive<br />

tendering procedure that follows the introduction of re<strong>for</strong>ms.<br />

1.2 Key Factors<br />

This Guide does not purport to set out draft clauses, instead it seeks to point out<br />

many of the issues that will need to be considered when developing concessiontype<br />

arrangements. As indicated in the Introduction, in Civil Law Jurisdiction,<br />

some of these issues may be addressed within the Civil Code and there<strong>for</strong>e would<br />

not need to be repeated in the Agreement, or where permitted, the Agreement<br />

may seek to deviate from the Civil Code and the wording should reflect that.<br />

There<strong>for</strong>e the Guide addresses not only general issues that may arise in relation<br />

to concessions but also factors and situations that are particular to railways, and<br />

their potential impact on a Concession Agreement. Although some of these factors<br />

and situations are neither mandatory nor essential, they illustrate issues that<br />

ought to be considered in concession-type arrangements.<br />

• Will the private sector party be a special-purpose vehicle? Initially, this might<br />

mean that the party uses its own contractors and their subcontractors to supply<br />

services on its behalf. Usually, a special-purpose vehicle is a company set<br />

up <strong>for</strong> a single purpose. After operations and maintenance costs are met,<br />

company revenues are used to pay off debt, pay interest on the debt, and pay<br />

a dividend on equity. The company may apply revenues towards increasing<br />

and/or improving assets used in connection with the concession, but would<br />

not be expected to acquire assets <strong>for</strong> any other purpose.<br />

• Does the public sector intend to create both a Concessionaire and the executed<br />

Concession Agreement, followed by a competition to divest the concession<br />

company to the private sector (namely with the benefit of the Concession<br />

Agreement)?<br />

• Will the public sector contracting party be a Ministry, a government agency,<br />

or a state-owned company, such as a railway holding company? If it is a Ministry,<br />

state guarantees will not be needed as they would be if the contracting<br />

party were a state-owned entity.<br />

• Will the assets to be used <strong>for</strong> the concession be transferred to the Concessionaire<br />

or will the transfer include only the rights to use the assets? As a<br />

corollary, where only the rights to use are transferred, will any new assets developed<br />

by the Concessionaire be transferred immediately to the Authority,<br />

with a continuing right <strong>for</strong> the Concessionaire to use them?<br />

• Will the concessioned railway assets be a subset of the host country’s railway<br />

system? Will the railway, subject of the Concession Agreement, be used primarily<br />

<strong>for</strong> freight, or must the Concessionaire allow infrastructure access to<br />

rail passenger traffic?<br />

The World Bank Page 240

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!